SummaryPathogen reduction (PR) of platelet products increases costs and available clinical studies are equivocal with respect to clinical and haemostatic effectiveness. We conducted a multicentre, open‐label, randomized, non‐inferiority trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of buffy‐coat derived leucoreduced platelet concentrates (PC) stored for up to 7 d in plasma with platelets stored in platelet additive solution III (PASIII) without and with treatment with amotosalen‐HCl/ultraviolet‐A (UVA) photochemical pathogen reduction (PR‐PASIII). Primary endpoint of the study was 1‐h corrected count increment (CCI). Secondary endpoints were 24‐h CCI, bleeding, transfusion requirement of red cells and PC, platelet transfusion interval and adverse transfusion reactions. Compared to plasma‐PC, in the intention to treat analysis of 278 evaluable patients the mean difference for the 1‐h CCI of PR‐PASIII‐PC and PASIII‐PC was −31% (P < 0·0001) and −9% (P = n.s.), respectively. Twenty‐seven patients (32%) had bleeding events in the PR‐PASIII arm, as compared to 19 (19%) in the plasma arm and 14 (15%) in the PASIII arm (P = 0·034). Despite the potential advantages of pathogen (and leucocyte) inactivation of amotosalen‐HCl/UVA‐treated platelet products, their clinical efficacy is inferior to platelets stored in plasma, warranting a critical reappraisal of employing this technique for clinical use.
Randomized studies testing the clinical efficacy of platelet additive solutions (PASs) for storage of platelets are scarce and often biased by patient selection. We conducted a multicenter, randomized study to investigate clinical efficacy of platelets stored in PAS II versus plasma, also including patients with clinical complications associated with increased platelet consumption. A total of 168 evaluable patients received pooled buffy coatderived platelet concentrates (PCs) suspended in either plasma (n ؍ 354) or PAS II (n ؍ 411) stored up to 5 days. Both univariate as well as multivariate analysis showed a significant effect of used storage medium in regard to 1-and 24-hour count increments and corrected count increments, in favor of plasma PCs. However, there were no significant differences between the groups regarding bleeding complications and transfusion interval. Adverse transfusion reactions occurred significantly less after transfusions with PAS II PCs (P ؍ .04). Multivariate analysis showed no significant effect of the used storage medium on the incidence of 1-and 24-hour transfusion failure. We showed safety and efficacy of PAS II PCs in intensively treated patients; however, plasma PCs show superior increments. (Blood. 2006;108:3210-3215)
The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal disorders characterized by dysplasia in at least two myeloid cell lines. Fatigue is one of the most significant symptoms. MDS patients are treated with blood transfusions to improve their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A cross-sectional pilot study was performed for psychometric evaluation of three internationally established HRQoL measures in MDS patients, and for investigation of the association between the severity of chronic anaemia and HRQoL. Fifty consecutive MDS patients completed the Short Form 36, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory and the EuroQoL-5D Visual Analogue Scale. Hb level was measured during the same visit. Psychometric analysis focused on feasibility, construct validity and reliability. The questionnaires showed a high feasibility, reliability and validity. MDS patients had worse HRQoL scores than the age- and sex-matched general population. We found a positive correlation between haemoglobin (Hb) level and HRQoL. This study provides insights into the suitability of established HRQoL measures for the evaluation of interventions in MDS patients. Hb value and HRQoL are complementary variables for evaluation of the severity of chronic anaemia in patients with MDS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.