Linezolid is used to treat patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drugresistant (XDR)-tuberculosis (TB) cases, although clinical data on its safety, tolerability and efficacy are lacking.We performed a retrospective, nonrandomised, unblinded observational study evaluating the safety and tolerability of linezolid at 600 mg q.d. or b.i.d. in MDR/XDR-TB treatment in four European countries. Efficacy evaluation compared end-points of 45 linezolid-treated against 110 linezolid-nontreated cases.Out of 195 MDR/XDR-TB patients, 85 were treated with linezolid for a mean of 221 days. Of these, 35 (41.2%) out of 85 experienced major side-effects attributed to linezolid (anaemia, thrombocytopenia and/or polyneuropathy), requiring discontinuation in 27 (77%) cases. Most side-effects occurred after 60 days of treatment. Twice-daily administration produced more major side-effects than once-daily dosing (p50.0004), with no difference in efficacy found. Outcomes were similar in patients treated with/without linezolid (p50.8), although linezolid-treated cases had more first-line (p50.002) and second-line (p50.02) drug resistance and a higher number of previous treatment regimens (4.5 versus 2.3; p50.07).Linezolid 600 mg q.d. added to an individualised multidrug regimen may improve the chance of bacteriological conversion, providing a better chance of treatment success in only the most complicated MDR/XDR-TB cases. Its safety profile does not warrant use in cases for which there are other, safer, alternatives.

Smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis can be diagnosed rapidly by identification of MTB-specific cells in the BAL fluid.

Rationale: The rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) is difficult when acid fast bacilli (AFB) cannot be detected in sputum smears. Objectives: Following a proof of principle study, we examined in routine clinical practice whether individuals with sputum AFB smearnegative TB can be discriminated from those with latent TB infection by local immunodiagnosis with a Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay. Methods: Subjects suspected of having active TB who were unable to produce sputum or with AFB-negative sputum smears were prospectively enrolled at Tuberculosis Network European Trialsgroup centers in Europe. ELISpot with early-secretory-antigenic-target-6 and culture-filtrate-protein-10 peptides was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and bronchoalveolar lavage mononuclear cells (BALMCs). M. tuberculosis-specific nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) was performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Measurements and Main Results: Seventy-one of 347 (20.4%) patients had active TB. Out of 276 patients who had an alternative diagnosis, 127 (46.0%) were considered to be latently infected with M. tuberculosis by a positive PBMC ELISpot result. The sensitivity and specificity of BALMC ELISpot for the diagnosis of active pulmonary TB were 91 and 80%, respectively. The BALMC ELISpot (diagnostic odds ratio [OR], 40.4) was superior to PBMC ELISpot (OR, 10.0), tuberculin skin test (OR, 7.8), and M. tuberculosis specific NAAT (OR, 12.4) to diagnose sputum AFB smear-negative TB. In contrast to PBMC ELISpot and tuberculin skin test, the BALMC ELISpot was not influenced by previous history of TB. Conclusions: Bronchoalveolar lavage ELISpot is an important advancement to rapidly distinguish sputum AFB smear-negative TB from latent TB infection in routine clinical practice.Tuberculosis (TB) is among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide (1). Pulmonary TB is the major manifestation of the disease (2). Despite constant diagnostic improvements, the rapid diagnosis of pulmonary TB is still difficult in a substantial proportion of cases (3). Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by culture is the diagnostic gold standard for active TB, but culture growth of M. tuberculosis may take 2 or more weeks on average (4), and its sensitivity is only approximately 80% (5).Microscopy for the identification of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) is rapid and inexpensive (6), but AFB are undetectable from the sputum smear in 85 to 90% of children (7) and in approximately 50% of adults (8) with active pulmonary TB. In these cases, the decision to initiate anti-TB treatment can be difficult, especially because sensitivity estimates for the nucleic acid amplification technique (NAAT) to detect nucleic acids of M. tuberculosis from respiratory specimen are too variable and too low to be used to exclude the diagnosis of TB (9).If combined test results are negative, immunodiagnosis by peripheral blood IFN-g release assays (IGRAs) and tuberculin skin testing (TST) may be used as rule...

No abstract

We evaluated risk factors and treatment outcomes associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) in Germany in [2004][2005][2006]. In 177 (4%) of 4,557 culture-positive TB cases, Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were identifi ed as MDR TB; an additional 7 (0.15%) met criteria for XDR TB. Of these 184 patients, 148 (80%) were born in countries of the former Soviet Union. In patients with XDR TB, hospitalization was longer (mean ± SD 202 ± 130 vs. 123 ± 81 days; p = 0.015) and resistance to all fi rst-line drugs was more frequent (36% vs. 86%; p = 0.013) than in patients with MDR TB. Seventyfour (40%) of these 184 patients received treatment with linezolid. Treatment success rates ranged from 59% for the entire cohort (59% for MDR TB and 57% for XDR TB) to 87% for those with a defi nitive outcome (n = 125; 89% for MDR TB and 80% for XDR TB). Extensive drug susceptibility testing and availability of second-and third-line drugs under inpatient management conditions permit relatively high treatment success rates in MDR and XDR TB.