Over 30% of ERα breast cancer patients develop relapses and progress to metastatic disease despite treatment with endocrine therapies. The pioneer factor PBX1 translates epigenetic cues and mediates estrogen induced ERα binding. Here we demonstrate that PBX1 plays a central role in regulating the ERα transcriptional response to epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling. PBX1 regulates a subset of EGF-ERα genes highly expressed in aggressive breast tumours. Retrospective stratification of luminal patients using PBX1 protein levels in primary cancer further demonstrates that elevated PBX1 protein levels correlate with earlier metastatic progression. In agreement, PBX1 protein levels are significantly upregulated during metastatic progression in ERα-positive breast cancer patients. Finally we reveal that PBX1 upregulation in aggressive tumours is partly mediated by genomic amplification of the PBX1 locus. Correspondingly, ERα-positive breast cancer patients carrying PBX1 amplification are characterized by poor survival. Notably, we demonstrate that PBX1 amplification can be identified in tumor derived-circulating free DNA of ERα-positive metastatic patients. Metastatic patients with PBX1 amplification are also characterized by shorter relapse-free survival. Our data identifies PBX1 amplification as a functional hallmark of aggressive ERα-positive breast cancers. Mechanistically, PBX1 amplification impinges on several critical pathways associated with aggressive ERα-positive breast cancer.

Summary The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most widely used score for non‐Hodgkin lymphoma but lacks the ability to identify a high‐risk population in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Low absolute lymphocyte count and high monocytes have proved to be unfavourable factors. Red‐cell distribution width (RDW) has been associated with inflammation and beta‐2 microglobulin (B2M) with tumour load. The retrospective study included 992 patients with DLBCL treated with R‐CHOP. In the multivariate analysis, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG‐PS), stage, bulky mass, B2M, RDW, and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) were independently related to progression‐free survival (PFS). A new prognosis score was generated with these variables including age categorized into three groups (0, 1, 2 points); ECOG ≥ 3–4 with two; stage III/IV, bulky mass, high B2M, LMR < 2·25 and RDW > 0·96 with one each; for a maximum of 9. This score could improve the discrimination of a very high‐risk subgroup with five‐year PFS and overall survival (OS) of 19% and 24% versus 45% and 59% of R (revised)‐IPI respectively. This score also showed greater predictive ability than IPI. A new score is presented including complete blood cell count variables and B2M, which are readily available in real‐life practice without additional tests. Compared to R‐IPI, it shows a more precise high‐risk assessment and risk discrimination for both PFS and OS.

BACKGROUND: The use of rituximab together with intensive chemotherapy in Burkitt's lymphoma or leukemia (BL) has been scarcely explored. This study prospectively evaluated and compared the outcome and toxicity of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐positive and HIV‐negative patients with BL who were treated in an intensive immunochemotherapy‐based and age‐adapted trial. METHODS: A total of 118 adult patients (80 HIV‐negative and 38 HIV‐positive) aged 15 to 83 years were treated with 4 (nonbulky stages I‐II) or 6 (stages II bulky, III‐IV) cycles of intensive chemotherapy combined with rituximab. Reduction in chemotherapy doses and modification of the cycle schedules was performed in patients older than 55 years. RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of HIV‐positive patients were comparable with those who were HIV‐negative. Complete remission rates were 82% and 87%, respectively, and 9 patients died in induction, 9 died in remission, and 7 relapsed. After a median follow‐up of 2.5 years, nonsignificant differences were observed in the 4‐year disease‐free survival and overall survival (OS) probabilities (77% and 63% for HIV‐positive and 80% and 78% for HIV‐negative patients, respectively). Young HIV‐infected patients presented higher incidences of grade 3 or 4 mucositis and severe infectious episodes. Poor general status and bone marrow involvement, but not advanced age, were associated with a shorter OS, allowing the definition of 3 prognostic groups, with the OS ranging from 50% to 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Age‐adapted intensive immunochemotherapy is highly effective in both HIV‐negative and HIV‐positive patients, with a higher toxicity in the latter group. Poor general status and bone marrow involvement had a negative impact on survival. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) comprises a heterogeneous group of patients, and is associated with poor overall survival (OS). We analyze the characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of sAML adult patients of the Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología (PETHEMA) registry. Overall, 6211 (72.9%) were de novo and 2310 (27.1%) sAML, divided into myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS-AML, 44%), MDS/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN-AML, 10%), MPN-AML (11%), therapy-related (t-AML, 25%), and antecedent neoplasia without prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy (neo-AML, 9%). Compared to de novo, sAML were older (median age 69 years old), had more ECOG ≥2 (35%) or high-risk cytogenetics (40%), less FLT3-ITD (11%) and NPM1 mutations (21%), and received less intensive chemotherapy regimens (38%) (all P&lt;0.001). Median OS was higher in de novo than in sAML (10.9 vs 5.6 months, P&lt;0.001); and shorter in sAML after hematologic disorder (MDS, MDS/MPN or MPN) as compared to t-AML and neo-AML (5.3 vs 6.1 vs 5.7 months, respectively, P=0.04). After intensive chemotherapy, median OS was better among de novo and neo-AML patients (17.2 and 14.6 months). No OS differences were observed after hypomethylating agents according to type of AML. sAML was as an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS. We confirm high prevalence and adverse features of sAML and we establish its independent adverse prognostic value. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02607059.

No abstract