Treatments for myeloma have expanded in the last decade, but it is not clear if the introduction of novel therapies and the increased use of high-dose therapy have translated into better outcome for patients with myeloma. We examined the outcome of 2 groups of patients seen at a single institution, one from time of diagnosis and the other from the time of relapse, to examine the survival trends over time. Among 387 patients relapsing after stemcell transplantation, a clear improvement in overall survival from the time of relapse was seen, with those relapsing after 2000 having a median overall survival of 23.9 versus 11.8 months (P < .001) for those who relapsed prior to this date. This improvement was independent of other prognostic factors. Patients treated with one or more of the newer drugs (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib) had longer survival from relapse (30.9 vs 14.8 months; P < .001). In a larger group of 2981 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, those diagnosed in the last decade had a 50% improvement in overall survival (44.8 vs 29.9 months; P < .001). In this study, we demonstrate improved outcome of patients with myeloma in recent years, both in the relapsed setting as well as at diagnosis. IntroductionMultiple myeloma (MM), a neoplasm of plasma cells, affects 1 to 5 per 100 000 individuals each year worldwide with a higher incidence in the West. 1 It is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the United States, and it is estimated that there will be 19 900 new diagnoses and 10 790 deaths due to myeloma in 2007. 2 The median survival of patients with MM was less than a year before introduction of alkylating agents, and the introduction of melphalan in the 1960s resulted in improved survival. 3,4 A timeline of major therapeutic advances in multiple myeloma is outlined in Table 1. In the 1980s, introduction of high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue (ASCT) was introduced, and randomized trials since have demonstrated a survival advantage for this modality compared with conventional chemotherapy (CCT). [5][6][7] The introduction of thalidomide represented a major milestone in the treatment of myeloma, and the subsequent availability of its analog lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium for myeloma. [8][9][10][11][12] Incorporation of these novel agents has resulted in a paradigm shift in the treatment of myeloma, with their use earlier in the disease course. 13 While the new drugs have allowed successful salvage of relapsed disease, it is not clear if the survival of patients has improved during the last few years. We examined patients seen at our institution over a 36-year period to determine whether there has been an improvement in survival of myeloma patients seen during this time period. MethodsWe examined 2 cohorts of patients seen at Mayo Clinic with a diagnosis of MM. The first cohort consisted of 387 patients who were examined for potential improvement in survival following first relapse after ASCT. These patients we...

Therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has dramatically changed in the past decade with introduction of new drugs, but it is not clear if the improvements have been sustained. We studied 1038 patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2010, grouping patients into two five-year periods by diagnosis, 2001–2005 and 2006–2010. The median estimated follow up for the cohort was 5.9 years with 47% alive at last follow up. The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 5.2 years; 4.6 years for patients in the 2001–2005 group compared with 6.1 years for the 2006–2010 cohort (P=0.002). The improvement was primarily seen among patients over 65 years; the 6-year OS improving from 31% to 56%; P<0.001. Only 10% of patients died during the first year in the latter group, compared with 17% in the earlier cohort (P<0.01), suggesting improvement in early mortality. The improved outcomes were linked closely to use of one or more new agents in initial therapy. The current results confirm continued survival improvement in MM and highlight the impact of initial therapy with novel agents. Most importantly, we demonstrate that the improved survival is benefitting older patients and that early mortality in this disease has reduced considerably.

A B S T R A C T PurposeCardiac involvement predicts poor prognosis in light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and the current prognostic classification is based on cardiac biomarkers troponin-T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP). However, long-term outcome is dependent on the underlying plasma cell clone, and incorporation of clonal characteristics may allow for better risk stratification. Patients and MethodsWe developed a prognostic model based on 810 patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis, which was further examined in two other datasets: 303 patients undergoing stem-cell transplantation, and 103 patients enrolled onto different clinical trials. ResultsWe examined the prognostic value of plasma cell-related characteristics (ie, difference between involved and uninvolved light chain [FLC-diff], marrow plasma cell percentage, circulating plasma cells, plasma cell labeling index, and ␤ 2 microglobulin). In a multivariate model that included these characteristics as well as cTnT and NT-ProBNP, only FLC-diff, cTnT, and NT-ProBNP were independently prognostic for overall survival (OS). Patients were assigned a score of 1 for each of FLC-diff Ն 18 mg/dL, cTnT Ն 0.025 ng/mL, and NT-ProBNP Ն 1,800 pg/mL, creating stages I to IV with scores of 0 to 3 points, respectively. The proportions of patients with stages I, II, III and IV disease were 189 (25%), 206 (27%), 186 (25%) and 177 (23%), and their median OS from diagnosis was 94.1, 40.3, 14, and 5.8 months, respectively (P Ͻ .001). This classification system was validated in the other datasets. ConclusionIncorporation of serum FLC-diff into the current staging system improves risk stratification for patients with AL amyloidosis and will help develop risk-adapted therapies for AL amyloidosis. J Clin