Background The purpose of this study was to test whether cryotherapy is superior to a sham procedure for reducing symptoms of chronic rhinitis. Methods This study was a prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized, sham‐controlled, patient‐blinded trial. The predetermined sample size was 61 participants per arm. Adults with moderate/severe symptoms of chronic rhinitis who were candidates for cryotherapy under local anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were required to have minimum reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSSs) of 4 for total, 2 for rhinorrhea, and 1 for nasal congestion. Follow‐up visits occurred at 30 and 90 days postprocedure. Patient‐reported outcome measures included the rTNSS, standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [RQLQ(S)], and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires. Adverse events were also recorded. The primary endpoint was the comparison between the treatment and sham arms for the percentage of responders at 90 days. Responders were defined as participants with a 30% or greater reduction in rTNSS relative to baseline. Results Twelve US investigational centers enrolled 133 participants. The primary endpoint analysis included 127 participants (64 active, 63 sham) with 90‐day results. The treatment arm was superior at the 90‐day follow‐up with 73.4% (47 of 64) responders compared with 36.5% (23 of 63) in the sham arm (p < 0.001). There were greater improvements in the rTNSS, RQLQ(S), and NOSE scores for the active arm over the sham arm at the 90‐day follow‐up (p < 0.001). One serious procedure‐related adverse event of anxiety/panic attack was reported. Conclusion Cryotherapy is superior to a sham procedure for improving chronic rhinitis symptoms and patient quality of life.

The symptomatic and endoscopic improvements observed confirm the efficacy of the steroid-eluting implant for in-office treatment of CRSwNP after ESS. These longer-term 6-month study results demonstrate that the steroid-eluting implant represents a durable, safe, and effective treatment strategy for this patient population.

BackgroundTopical intranasal corticosteroid sprays (INCSs) are standard treatment for nasal polyps (NPs), but their efficacy is reduced by poor patient compliance and impaired access of drug to the sinus mucosa. A corticosteroid‐eluting sinus implant was designed to address these limitations in patients with recurrent polyposis after sinus surgery by delivering 1350 μg of mometasone furoate (MF) directly to the ethmoid sinus mucosa over approximately 90 days.MethodsA randomized, sham‐controlled, double‐blind trial was undertaken in 300 adults with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with NPs (CRSwNP), who were candidates for repeat surgery. Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) and underwent in‐office bilateral placement of 2 implants or a sham procedure. All patients used the MF INCS 200 μg once daily. Co‐primary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline in nasal obstruction/congestion score and bilateral polyp grade, as determined by an independent panel based on centralized, blinded videoendoscopy review.ResultsPatients treated with implants experienced significant reductions in both nasal obstruction/congestion score (p = 0.0074) and bilateral polyp grade (p = 0.0073) compared to controls. At day 90, implants were also associated with significant reductions in 4 of 5 prespecified secondary endpoints compared to control: proportion of patients still indicated for repeat sinus surgery (p = 0.0004), percent ethmoid sinus obstruction (p = 0.0007), nasal obstruction/congestion (p = 0.0248), and decreased sense of smell (p = 0.0470), but not facial pain/pressure (p = 0.9130). One patient experienced an implant‐related serious adverse event (epistaxis).ConclusionSignificant improvements over a range of subjective and objective endpoints, including a reduction in the need for sinus surgery by 61%, suggest that MF sinus implants may play an important role in management of recurrent NP.

Objectives/Hypothesis To assess the long‐term (12–24 months) safety and effectiveness of cryoablation of the posterior nasal nerve as treatment for chronic rhinitis. Study Design A multicenter, prospective, single‐arm clinical study. Methods The study was conducted from February 2017 to April 2020. Study endpoints included change from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), physician assessment of improvement using the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI–I), and the incidence of treatment‐related adverse events. Results Ninety‐one participants completed the study through the initial 12‐month study period. Sixty‐two participants consented to the long‐term follow‐up with 57 completing the 24‐month follow‐up. Significant improvements in the total rTNSS were reflected in a median change from baseline of −3.0 or −4.0 at all timepoints (P < .001). Greater than 80.0% of participants achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of improvement by ≥1 point on the rTNSS at all follow‐ups. Total RQLQ scores indicated significant improvement (P < .0001) in quality of life. Over 77% of participants achieved the MCID (≥0.5 points) for the total RQLQ score. According to the CGI–I, ≥83.0% experienced improvement at all but the 12‐month visit (61.9%). One participant experienced two treatment‐related serious adverse events (epistaxis and retained pledget). A total of 29 nonserious treatment‐related AEs were reported in 23 participants; most events were transient and resolved with little to no intervention. Conclusions Cryotherapy significantly and clinically improves rhinitis symptoms and quality of life with outcomes that are durable through 24 months after treatment. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1952–1957, 2021

No abstract