SUMMARY Binding of the HIV envelope to the chemokine coreceptors triggers membrane fusion and signal transduction. The fusion process has been well characterized, yet the role of coreceptor signaling remains elusive. Here we describe a critical function of the chemokine coreceptor signaling in facilitating HIV infection of resting CD4 T cells. We find that static cortical actin in resting T cells represents a restriction, and HIV utilizes the Gαi-dependent signaling from the chemokine coreceptor CXCR4 to activate a cellular actin depolymerizing factor, cofilin, to overcome this restriction. HIV envelope-mediated cofilin activation and actin dynamics are important for a post entry process that leads to viral nuclear localization. Inhibition of HIV-mediated actin rearrangement markedly diminishes viral latent infection of resting T cells. Conversely, induction of active cofilin greatly facilitates it. These findings shed new light on viral exploitation of cellular machinery in resting T cells, where chemokine receptor signaling becomes obligatory.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) RNA replication occurred in seven of nine primate cell cultures transfected with in vitro transcripts of an infectious cDNA clone. Cell-to-cell spread did not occur in cell cultures, but rhesus monkeys inoculated with lysates of HEV-transfected PLC/PRF/5 and Huh-7 cells became infected with HEV. A replicon with the ORF2 and ORF3 genes deleted and replaced with the green fluorescent protein gene also replicated in the same primate cells that supported the replication of the full-length genome. Fluorescenceactivated cell sorter analysis confirmed that the 7mG cap structure was critical for efficient infectivity, although replication could be initiated at a very low level in its absence. HEV virions were also able to infect a limited number of cells of certain lines.Hepatitis E virus (HEV), the prototype Hepevirus, and hepatitis A virus (HAV) together are the major etiological agents of enterically transmitted hepatitis (4,8,23). HEV has a higher mortality rate, especially in pregnant women, but the reason for this is unknown. Otherwise, the disease caused by the one virus is clinically indistinguishable from that caused by the other, and neither progresses to chronicity. Both viruses have nonenveloped capsids, and both contain a single stranded RNA genome of the positive sense which serves as an mRNA to initiate infection.In spite of the similarities, HEV and HAV have very different epidemiologies. HAV age-related seroprevalence patterns are those expected for a virus that is transmitted by the fecaloral route, whereas those of HEV are not, even though fecal contamination is the major source of transmission. In countries in which the virus is endemic, anti-HAV antibodies are generally acquired before the age of 5 years, whereas the major rise in anti-HEV seroprevalence occurs later, in young adults (3). HAV has been found only in humans and in some nonhuman primates. HEV, on the other hand, has been isolated from humans and swine (7,9,20): additionally, antibodies reactive with capsid protein from human strains of HEV have been found in many animals, including nonhuman primates (2) and multiple species of rodents including rats (6, 11). A genotype 3 strain of HEV naturally infecting swine has been passed experimentally to monkeys, and a genotype 3 strain infecting humans has been passed to swine (18). However, attempts to transmit other human strains to swine have failed (19). The question of whether HEV is a zoonosis is still open (17), but a recent cluster of hepatitis E cases in Japan was traced to ingestion of raw deer meat, suggesting that this may be the case (26).The molecular biology of HEV replication is not well un- Much of the scant knowledge concerning HEV at the molecular level has been obtained through the overexpression of recombinant proteins in vitro. In addition to identification of an active viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, (1), such studies have led to the demonstration of guanylyltransferase and methyltransferase activities (15), two enzymatic activities required to ...

Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV), human metapneumovirus (HMPV), and human parainfluenza virus type 3 (HPIV3) are common, important respiratory pathogens, but HRSV has a substantially greater impact with regard to acute disease, long-term effects on airway function, and frequency of re-infection. It has been reported to strongly interfere with the functioning of dendritic cells (DCs). We compared HRSV to HMPV and HPIV3 with regard to their effects on human monocyte-derived immature DCs (IDC). Side-by-side analysis distinguished between common effects versus those specific to individual viruses. The use of GFP-expressing viruses yielded clear identification of robustly infected cells and provided the means to distinguish between direct effects of robust viral gene expression versus bystander effects. All three viruses infected inefficiently based on GFP expression, with considerable donor-to donor-variability. The GFP-negative cells exhibited low, abortive levels of viral RNA synthesis. The three viruses induced low-to-moderate levels of DC maturation and cytokine/chemokine responses, increasing slightly in the order HRSV, HMPV, and HPIV3. Infection at the individual cell level was relatively benign, such that in general GFP-positive cells were neither more nor less able to mature compared to GFP-negative bystanders, and cells were responsive to a secondary treatment with lipopolysaccharide, indicating that the ability to mature was not impaired. However, there was a single exception, namely that HPIV3 down-regulated CD38 expression at the RNA level. Maturation by these viruses was anti-apoptotic. Inefficient infection of IDC and sub-optimal maturation might result in reduced immune responses, but these effects would be common to all three viruses rather than specific to HRSV.