clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00445601.

Purpose In this multicenter study, we evaluated the cumulative burden of morbidity (CBM) among > 1,200 testicular cancer survivors and applied factor analysis to determine the co-occurrence of adverse health outcomes (AHOs). Patients and Methods Participants were ≤ 55 years of age at diagnosis, finished first-line chemotherapy ≥ 1 year previously, completed a comprehensive questionnaire, and underwent physical examination. Treatment data were abstracted from medical records. A CBM score encompassed the number and severity of AHOs, with ordinal logistic regression used to assess associations with exposures. Nonlinear factor analysis and the nonparametric dimensionality evaluation to enumerate contributing traits procedure determined which AHOs co-occurred. Results Among 1,214 participants, approximately 20% had a high (15%) or very high/severe (4.1%) CBM score, whereas approximately 80% scored medium (30%) or low/very low (47%). Increased risks of higher scores were associated with four cycles of either ifosfamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (odds ratio [OR], 1.96; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.71) or bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.98), older attained age (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.26), current disability leave (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.57 to 7.95), less than a college education (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.87), and current or former smoking (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.63). CBM score did not differ after either chemotherapy regimen ( P = .36). Asian race (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.72) and vigorous exercise (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89) were protective. Variable clustering analyses identified six significant AHO clusters (χ P < .001): hearing loss/damage, tinnitus (OR, 16.3); hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes (OR, 9.8); neuropathy, pain, Raynaud phenomenon (OR, 5.5); cardiovascular and related conditions (OR, 5.0); thyroid disease, erectile dysfunction (OR, 4.2); and depression/anxiety, hypogonadism (OR, 2.8). Conclusion Factors associated with higher CBM may identify testicular cancer survivors in need of closer monitoring. If confirmed, identified AHO clusters could guide the development of survivorship care strategies.

Purpose Increased risks of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with testicular cancer (TC) given chemotherapy in European studies were largely restricted to long-term survivors and included patients from the 1960s. Few population-based investigations have quantified CVD mortality during, shortly after, and for two decades after TC diagnosis in the era of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for CVD and absolute excess risks (AERs; number of excess deaths per 10,000 person-years) were calculated for 15,006 patients with testicular nonseminoma reported to the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1980 to 2010) who initially received chemotherapy (n = 6,909) or surgery (n = 8,097) without radiotherapy and accrued 60,065 and 81,227 person-years of follow-up, respectively. Multivariable modeling evaluated effects of age, treatment, extent of disease, and other factors on CVD mortality. Results Significantly increased CVD mortality occurred after chemotherapy (SMR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.78; n = 54) but not surgery (SMR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.07; n = 50). Significant excess deaths after chemotherapy were restricted to the first year after TC diagnosis (SMR, 5.31; AER, 13.90; n = 11) and included cerebrovascular disease (SMR, 21.72; AER, 7.43; n = 5) and heart disease (SMR, 3.45; AER, 6.64; n = 6). In multivariable analyses, increased CVD mortality after chemotherapy was confined to the first year after TC diagnosis (hazard ratio, 4.86; 95% CI, 1.25 to 32.08); distant disease (P < .05) and older age at diagnosis (P < .01) were independent risk factors. Conclusion This is the first population-based study, to our knowledge, to quantify short- and long-term CVD mortality after TC diagnosis. The increased short-term risk of CVD deaths should be further explored in analytic studies that enumerate incident events and can serve to develop comprehensive evidence-based approaches for risk stratification and application of preventive and interventional efforts.

BACKGROUNDThe elucidation of new therapeutic targets of prognostic significance in colon carcinoma is necessary to improve outcomes. In the current study, the authors examined the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in primary colon carcinoma cases and VEGF in tumor‐associated macrophages (TAM)/stroma, and their correlation with survival.METHODSThe authors identified 131 consecutive American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage II and Stage III colon carcinoma patients seen at the University of Rochester between 1990–1995. Expression of VEGF, EGFR, and CD68 were examined by immunohistochemistry in paraffin‐embedded primary colon tumors and graded as the percentage of cells stained. Data were analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.RESULTSVEGF expression in tumor was not found to be significantly associated with survival. However, 42% of the patients expressed VEGF in TAM/stroma. The median survival in this group was 9.7 years versus 4.3 years in the VEGF‐negative (TAM/stroma) group (hazards ratio of 0.57, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.34–0.95; P = 0.03). Although TAM infiltration alone was not found to be significant in multivariate analysis, the presence of both CD68 and VEGF (TAM/stroma) was predictive of improved survival (hazards ratio of 0.48, 95% CI, 0.28–0.83; P = 0.006). High grades of EGFR expression (≥ Grade 2) were found to be associated with a trend toward worsened survival.CONCLUSIONSThe greater than twofold increase in median survival associated with VEGF‐expressing TAM suggests a hitherto unknown role for this subset of cells in the host response to colon carcinoma and requires further investigation. Overexpression of EGFR may be associated with worsened survival, providing a rationale for trials of anti‐EGFR agents as adjuvant therapy. Cancer 2003;97:960–8. © 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11152