ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic value of implementing a stepwise genetic testing strategy (SGTS) in genetically unsolved cases with dystrophinopathies.MethodsAfter routine genetic testing in 872 male patients with highly suspected dystrophinopathies, we identified 715 patients with a pathogenic DMD variant. Of the 157 patients who had no pathogenic DMD variants and underwent a muscle biopsy, 142 patients were confirmed to have other myopathies, and 15 suspected dystrophinopathies remained genetically undiagnosed. These 15 patients underwent a more comprehensive evaluation as part of the SGTS pipeline, which included the stepwise analysis of dystrophin mRNA, short-read whole-gene DMD sequencing, long-read whole-gene DMD sequencing and in silico bioinformatic analyses.ResultsSGTS successfully yielded a molecular diagnosis of dystrophinopathy in 11 of the 15 genetically unsolved cases. We identified 8 intronic and 2 complex structural variants (SVs) leading to aberrant splicing in 10 of 11 patients, of which 9 variants were novel. In one case, a molecular defect was detected on mRNA and protein level only. Aberrant splicing mechanisms included 6 pseudoexon inclusions and 4 alterations of splice sites and splicing regulatory elements. We showed for the first time the exonisation of a MER48 element as a novel pathogenic mechanism in dystrophinopathies.ConclusionOur study highlights the high diagnostic utility of implementing a SGTS pipeline in dystrophinopathies with intronic variants and complex SVs.

No abstract

The genetics of autosomal recessive intellectual disability (ARID) has mainly been studied in consanguineous families, however, founder populations may also be of interest to study intellectual disability (ID) and the contribution of ARID. Here, we used a genotype-driven approach to study the genetic landscape of ID in the founder population of Finland. A total of 39 families with syndromic and non-syndromic ID were analyzed using exome sequencing, which revealed a variant in a known ID gene in 27 families. Notably, 75% of these variants in known ID genes were de novo or suspected de novo (64% autosomal dominant; 11% X-linked) and 25% were inherited (14% autosomal recessive; 7% X-linked; and 4% autosomal dominant). A dual molecular diagnosis was suggested in two families (5%). Via additional analysis and molecular testing, we identified three cases with an abnormal molecular karyotype, including chr21q22.12q22.2 uniparental disomy with a mosaic interstitial 2.7 Mb deletion covering DYRK1A and KCNJ6. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was identified in 64% (25/39) of the families. Last, we report an alternate inheritance model for 3 known ID genes (UBA7, DDX47, DHX58) and discuss potential candidate genes for ID, including SYPL1 and ERGIC3 with homozygous founder variants and de novo variants in POLR2F and DNAH3. In summary, similar to other European populations, de novo variants were the most common variants underlying ID in the studied Finnish population, with limited contribution of ARID to ID etiology, though mainly driven by founder and potential founder variation in the latter case.