American Thoracic Society, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Respiratory Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America.

W e read with great interest the mathematical model presented by Fofana et al. (1) on the role of pyrazinamide (PZA) in the emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB), particularly as the results of their model mirror our concerns regarding the amplification of PZA resistance during inappropriate first-line therapy and the dramatic negative consequences that this can have on the subsequent response to second-line therapy. Indeed recent data from Belarus suggest that approximately 50% of PZA resistance is acquired de novo (2). Fofana et al. (1) propose that this problem, a result of using the same important agent in first-and second-line therapy, might be circumvented by using an as-yet-unidentified new agent with characteristics similar to those of PZA in a new second-line regimen. Although considerable effort is being applied to the development of new targets for such agents (3), it is far from certain when or even if these miraculous drugs will be available for routine use. Consequently, PZA is currently a uniquely valuable agent, which we speculate will be very difficult to replace (4, 5). We therefore suggest that in settings where the a priori risk of MDR TB due to transmission is above a certain level, such as in Belarus, prescribing PZA to new patients before they have been screened for rifampin and isoniazid resistance is likely counterproductive. Screening for PZA resistance is still complicated and not in reach for many laboratories. Of course, in an ideal world, a full drug susceptibility test (DST) profile would be available for all patients before TB therapy is prescribed. Unfortunately, in reality, this is seldom the case; at best, there is a considerable delay before DST results are communicated to the physician, and at worst, DST is not performed at all until there is evidence of treatment failure, which may be between 2 and 6 months after starting the patient on first-line agents. As this scenario appears to account for 50% of the PZA resistance seen in MDR-TB cases in many settings (5), action is required now to prevent transmissible PZA-resistant mutants from becoming widely established (6, 7). Thus, we propose that, in settings with a high proportion of MDR-TB patients, PZA be withheld until there is evidence of susceptibility to other first-line agents, because of either a clinical response (acid-fast bacillus [AFB] smear conversion) or a solid laboratory diagnosis. Modeling the exact proportion of primary MDR-TB patients in whom PZA resistance was prevented, a population benefitting from this change, and discussion of the ethics of this approach would be highly informative. Delaying action Citation Anthony RM, Cynamon M, Hoffner S, Werngren J, den Hertog AL, van Soolingen D. 2017. Protecting pyrazinamide, a priority for improving outcomes in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00258-17. https://doi.

Tuberculosis patients may harbor both drug-susceptible and -resistant bacteria, i.e., heteroresistance. We used mixtures of rifampin-resistant and -susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains to simulate heteroresistance in patient samples. Molecular tests can be used for earlier discovery of multidrug resistance (MDR), but the sensitivity to detect heteroresistance is unknown. Conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing was the most sensitive, whereas two line probe assays and sequencing were unable to detect the clinically important 1% resistant bacteria. Patients with tuberculosis (TB) that harbor drug-susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains may also have a small proportion of drug-resistant bacteria that develops spontaneously during replication, normally at a rate of 10 Ϫ8 to 10 Ϫ9 mutations/ cell division (1). For rifampin (Rif) resistance, mutations are almost exclusively found in a single gene, rpoB (2). Conventional drug susceptibility testing (DST) aims to determine if 1% or more of the bacterial population in clinical specimens is drug resistant (3, 4). In this study, cultures that contain both susceptible and at least 1% resistant bacteria are defined as heteroresistant. Heteroresistance is thought to be an early stage in the development of drug-resistant TB in a patient. In such cases, failing to detect resistance may lead to insufficient treatment and treatment failure. As a consequence, spread of resistant bacteria may occur in the future (5). The prevalence of heteroresistance is unknown and is presumably dependent on the local resistance epidemiology. Findings of heteroresistance are accidental, and simple methods for the detection are needed (6).In recent years, a number of genotypic methods have become available for rapid detection of mutations that may confer resistance. Molecular tests have been recommended for use worldwide, with the objective of earlier discovery of multidrug resistance (MDR) (http://www.who.int/tb/features_archive/policy _statement.pdf). These assays are important for the global scaling up of detection of MDR-TB. However, little is known of the sensitivity of these methods to detect resistance in heteroresistant specimens. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ability of different DST methods to detect Rif resistance when heteroresistance is present.Two freeze-dried strains each of the spoligo families Haarlem and Beijing were obtained from the WHO Tropical Disease Research (TDR) TB Strain Bank. The Haarlem strain TB-TDR-063 was susceptible, and TB-TDR-165 was Rif resistant with the rpoB H526Y mutation. The Beijing strain TB-TDR-077 was susceptible, and TB-TDR-068 was Rif resistant with the rpoB S531L mutation. The susceptible strains from both families had wild-type (WT) DNA in rpoB. The strains were subcultured in Dubos with 0.045% Tween 80 (SSI Diagnostika, Hilleroed, Denmark) with 1 mg/ml Rif (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) diluted in water for the resistant strains. After 2 weeks of incubation at 37°C, the bacterial concentrations in liquid medi...

Since the late 1980s several studies have described the increased incidence and severity of invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) infections. However, most studies on GAS pathogenesis have focused on information obtained during outbreaks. We analyzed isolate distribution and host susceptibility as part of a nationwide prospective surveillance study performed between January 2001 and August 2002. GAS isolates collected from 201 patients with invasive infections, 335 patients with noninvasive infections, and 17 asymptomatic carriers were characterized with respect to their emm types and superantigen genotypes. The superantigen-neutralizing capacity and levels of antibodies against streptolysin O and DNAse B were determined for isolates from the sera from 36 invasive cases and 91 noninvasive cases. emm type 1 (emm-1) isolates were significantly more common among invasive cases, whereas emm-4, emm-6, and emm-12 dominated among the noninvasive cases. The distributions of the phage-associated superantigen genes (speA, speC, speH, speI, ssa) differed among invasive and noninvasive isolates, mainly due to their linkage to certain emm types. No significant differences in serum superantigen-neutralizing capacities were observed. The levels of anti-streptolysin O and anti-DNAse B antibodies were highest in the sera from invasive cases. Our study emphasizes the importance of obtaining data during years with stable incidences, which will enable evaluation of future outbreak data.

Study question Does maternal infection with SARS-CoV-2 in first trimester pregnancy have an impact on the fetal development as measured by nuchal translucency thickness and pregnancy loss? Summary answer Nuchal translucency thickness at the first trimester scan was not significantly different in pregnant women with versus without SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy and there was no significant increased risk of pregnancy loss in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester. What is known already Pregnant women are more vulnerable to viral infections. Previous coronavirus epidemics have been associated with increased maternal morbidity, mortality and adverse obstetric outcomes. Currently, no evidence exists regarding possible effects of SARS-CoV-2 in first trimester pregnancies. Study design, size, duration Cohort study of 1,019 women with a double test taken between Feb. 17 and Apr. 23, 2020, as a part of the combined first trimester risk assessment, and 36 women with a first trimester pregnancy loss between Apr. 14 and May 21, 2020, prior to the double test. The study period was during the first SARS-CoV-2 epidemic wave in Denmark. Participants/materials, setting, methods Cohort 1 included pregnant women with a double test taken within the study period. The excess serum from each double test was analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Results were correlated to the nuchal translucency thickness and the number of pregnancy losses before or at the time of the first trimester scan. Cohort 2 included women with a pregnancy loss before the gestational age for double test sample. Serum from a blood test taken the day the pregnancy loss was identified was analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The study was conducted at a public university hospital serving approximately 12% of pregnant women and births in Denmark. All participants in the study provided written informed consent. Main results and the role of chance Eighteen (1.8%) women had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the serum from the double test suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy. There was no significant difference in nuchal translucency thickness for women testing positive for previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 18) versus negative (n = 994) (p = 0.62). There was no significant increased risk of pregnancy loss for women with positive antibodies (n = 1) (OR 3.4, 0.08-24.3 95% CI, p = 0.27). None of the women had been hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. None of the women with pregnancy loss prior to the double test (Cohort 2) had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Limitations, reasons for caution These results may only apply to similar populations and to patients who do not require hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. A limitation of the study is that only 1.8% of the study population had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies suggestive of previous infection. Wider implication of the findings Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection had no effect on the nuchal translucency thickness and there was no significant increased risk of pregnancy loss for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in first trimester pregnancy. Evidence concerning Covid-19 in pregnancy is still limited. These data indicate that infection with SARS-CoV-2 in not hospitalized women does not pose a significant threat in first trimester pregnancies. Follow up studies are needed to establish any risk to a fetus exposed to maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Study funding/competing interest(s) Prof. Henriette Svarre Nielsen (HSN) and colleagues received a grant from the Danish Government for research of Covid-19 among pregnant women. The Danish government was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report or decision to submit the paper for publication. AI, JOL, JBR, DMS, JEF, and ERH received funding from a Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF) Young Investigator Grant (NNF15OC0016662) and a Danish National Science Foundation Center Grant (6110-00344B). AI received a Novo Scholarship. JOL is funded by an NNF Pregraduate Fellowship (NNF19OC0058982). DW is funded by the NNF (NNF18SA0034956, NNF14CC0001, NNF17OC0027594). AMK is funded by a grant from the Rigshospitalet’s research fund. Henriette Svarre Nielsen has received speakeŕs fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck Denmark A/S and Ibsa Nordic (outside the submitted work). Nina la Cour Freiesleben has received a grant from Gedeon Richter (outside the submitted work). Astrid Marie Kolte has received speakeŕs from Merck (outside the submitted work). The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.