Background: An adequate health workforce is an essential building block of effective health systems. In South Africa, medical officers (MOs) are a key component of service delivery in district health services. The Stellenbosch University Family Physician Research Network in the Western Cape identified that retention of MOs was a key issue. The aim of this study was to explore the factors that influence the retention of MOs in public sector district health services in the Western Cape, South Africa.Methods: This is a descriptive exploratory qualitative study. Medical officers were purposefully selected in terms of districts, facility types, gender, seniority and perceived likelihood of leaving in the next four years. Semi-structured interviews were performed by family physicians, and the qualitative data were analysed using the framework method.Results: Fourteen MOs were interviewed, and four major themes were identified: career intentions; experience of clinical work; experience of the organisation; and personal, family and community issues. Key issues that influenced retention were: ensure that the foundational elements are in place (e.g. adequate salary and good infrastructure), nurture cohesive team dynamics and relationships, have a family physician, continue the shift towards more collaborative and appreciative management styles, create stronger career pathways and opportunities for professional development in the district health services, be open to flexible working hours and overtime, and ensure workload is manageable.Conclusion: A number of important factors influencing retention were identified. Leaders and managers of the healthcare services could intervene across these multiple factors to enhance the conditions needed to retain MOs.

Background: Coordinating care for patients is a key characteristic of effective primary care. Family physicians in the Western Cape formed a research network to enable them to perform practical research on key questions from clinical practice. The initial question selected by the network focused on evaluating the quality of referrals to and feedback from outpatient departments at referral hospitals to primary care providers in the Western Cape. Methods: A descriptive survey combined quantitative data collected from the medical records with quantitative and qualitative data collected from the patients by questionnaire. Family physicians collected data on consecutive patients who had attended outpatient appointments in the last three months. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: Seven family physicians submitted data on 141 patients (41% male, 59% female; 46% metropolitan, 54% rural). Referrals were to district (18%), regional (28%) and tertiary hospitals (51%). Referral letters were predominantly biomedical. Written feedback was available in 39% of patients. In 32% of patients, doctors spent time obtaining feedback; the patient was the main source of information in 53% of cases, although many patients did not know what the hospital doctor thought was wrong (36%). The quality of referrals differed significantly by district and type of practitioner, while feedback differed significantly by level of hospital. Conclusion: Primary care providers did not obtain reliable feedback on specialist consultations at referral hospital outpatients. Attention must be given to barriers to care as well as communication, coordination and relationships across the primarysecondary interface.

Background: Coordinating care for patients is a key characteristic of effective primary care. Family physicians in the Western Cape formed a research network to enable them to perform practical research on key questions from clinical practice. The initial question selected by the network focused on evaluating the quality of referrals to and feedback from outpatient departments at referral hospitals to primary care providers in the Western Cape.Methods: A descriptive survey combined quantitative data collected from the medical records with quantitative and qualitative data collected from the patients by questionnaire. Family physicians collected data on consecutive patients who had attended outpatient appointments in the last three months. Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.Results: Seven family physicians submitted data on 141 patients (41% male, 59% female; 46% metropolitan, 54% rural). Referrals were to district (18%), regional (28%) and tertiary hospitals (51%). Referral letters were predominantly biomedical. Written feedback was available in 39% of patients. In 32% of patients, doctors spent time obtaining feedback; the patient was the main source of information in 53% of cases, although many patients did not know what the hospital doctor thought was wrong (36%). The quality of referrals differed significantly by district and type of practitioner, while feedback differed significantly by level of hospital.Conclusion: Primary care providers did not obtain reliable feedback on specialist consultations at referral hospital outpatients. Attention must be given to barriers to care as well as communication, coordination and relationships across the primary–secondary interface.