Early increase of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) serum levels is indicative of increased risk of progression of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to respiratory failure. The SAVE-MORE double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of anakinra, an IL-1α/β inhibitor, in 594 patients with COVID-19 at risk of progressing to respiratory failure as identified by plasma suPAR ≥6 ng ml−1, 85.9% (n = 510) of whom were receiving dexamethasone. At day 28, the adjusted proportional odds of having a worse clinical status (assessed by the 11-point World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHO-CPS)) with anakinra, as compared to placebo, was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.26–0.50). The median WHO-CPS decrease on day 28 from baseline in the placebo and anakinra groups was 3 and 4 points, respectively (odds ratio (OR) = 0.40, P < 0.0001); the respective median decrease of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score on day 7 from baseline was 0 and 1 points (OR = 0.63, P = 0.004). Twenty-eight-day mortality decreased (hazard ratio = 0.45, P = 0.045), and hospital stay was shorter.

In this large, prospective, multinational cohort, more than one half of all cases of non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis were associated with health care contact. Non-HACEK gram-negative bacillus endocarditis is not primarily a disease of injection drug users.

This is the largest series to our knowledge of streptococcal PJI managed by DAIR, showing a worse prognosis than previously reported. The beneficial effects of exchanging the removable components and of β-lactams are confirmed and maybe also a potential benefit from adding rifampin.

We appreciate the thoughtful comments of Drs Almonedro-Delia, Galvez-Acebal, and Rodriguez-Bano regarding our recent publication, "Association Between Surgical Indications, Operative Risk, and Clinical Outcome in Infective Endocarditis: a Prospective Study From the International Collaboration on Endocarditis." 1 These authors raise important issues for evaluating the impact of surgery on patient outcomes, particularly survival. We strongly agree that treatment selection bias and survivor bias are major issues when evaluating the impact of surgery on mortality and that the use of appropriate statistical methodologies is necessary to quantify an unbiased and causal association of the effect of surgical treatment on outcome. In our previous studies on the impact of surgery on mortality, we have used such methods, including propensity scores, 2 to account for selection bias and Cox proportional hazards models with surgery entered as a time-dependent covariate 3,4 for survivor bias adjustment. However, the objective of the current study was to evaluate the differences in clinical characteristics comparing patients treated with and without cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis, and to evaluate the relationship between surgical indications, operative risk (by using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons operative risk score), and outcome. Our results emphasize the relevance of specific surgical indications in treatment decisions in infective endocarditis, and the relationship between the Society of Thoracic Surgeons operative risk score and outcome, as well. The purpose of our study was not to determine the prognostic influence of surgery in comparison with medical therapy alone in infective endocarditis.

IntroductionAlthough major changes of the immune system have been described in sepsis, it has never been studied whether these may differ in relation to the type of underlying infection or not. This was studied for the first time.MethodsThe statuses of the innate and adaptive immune systems were prospectively compared in 505 patients. Whole blood was sampled within less than 24 hours of advent of sepsis; white blood cells were stained with monoclonal antibodies and analyzed though a flow cytometer.ResultsExpression of HLA-DR was significantly decreased among patients with severe sepsis/shock due to acute pyelonephritis and intraabdominal infections compared with sepsis. The rate of apoptosis of natural killer (NK) cells differed significantly among patients with severe sepsis/shock due to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) compared with sepsis. The rate of apoptosis of NKT cells differed significantly among patients with severe sepsis/shock due to acute pyelonephritis, primary bacteremia and VAP/HAP compared with sepsis. Regarding adaptive immunity, absolute counts of CD4-lymphocytes were significantly decreased among patients with severe sepsis/shock due to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and intraabdominal infections compared with sepsis. Absolute counts of B-lymphocytes were significantly decreased among patients with severe sepsis/shock due to CAP compared with sepsis.ConclusionsMajor differences of the early statuses of the innate and adaptive immune systems exist between sepsis and severe sepsis/shock in relation to the underlying type of infection. These results may have a major impact on therapeutics.