Von Willebrand factor (VWF) activates in response to shear flow to initiate hemostasis, while aberrant activation could lead to thrombosis. Above a critical shear force, the A1 domain of VWF becomes activated and captures platelets via the GPIb-IX complex. Here we show that the shear-responsive element controlling VWF activation resides in the discontinuous autoinhibitory module (AIM) flanking A1. Application of tensile force in a single-molecule setting induces cooperative unfolding of the AIM to expose A1. The AIM-unfolding force is lowered by truncating either N- or C-terminal AIM region, type 2B VWD mutations, or binding of a ristocetin-mimicking monoclonal antibody, all of which could activate A1. Furthermore, the AIM is mechanically stabilized by the nanobody that comprises caplacizumab, the only FDA-approved anti-thrombotic drug to-date that targets VWF. Thus, the AIM is a mechano-regulator of VWF activity. Its conformational dynamics may define the extent of VWF autoinhibition and subsequent activation under force.

Background The hierarchical hemostasis response involves a self-inhibitory feature of von Willebrand factor (VWF) that has not been fully characterized. The residues flanking the A1 domain of VWF are important in this self-inhibition by forming an autoinhibitory module (AIM) that masks the A1 domain. Objectives To delimit the AIM sequence and to evaluate the cooperative interplay between the discontinuous AIM regions. Methods ELISA, flow cytometry, a thermal stability assay and hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) mass spectrometry were used to characterize recombinant VWF A1 fragments varying in length. Results The longest A1 fragment (rVWF ) showed higher inactivity in binding the platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP) Ibα and greater thermostability than its shorter counterparts. The HDX results showed that most of the N-terminal residues and residues 1459-1478 at the C-terminus of rVWF have slower deuterium uptake than the residues in its denatured counterpart, implying that these residues may interact with the A1 domain. In contrast, residues 1479-1493 showed less difference from the denatured form, indicating that these residues are unlikely to be involved in binding the A1 domain. The A1 fragment that lacks either the entire C-terminal flanking region of the AIM (C-AIM), i.e. rVWF , or the entire N-terminal flanking region of the AIM (N-AIM), i.e. rVWF , showed high GPIbα-binding affinity and low thermostability, suggesting that removal of either N-terminal or C-terminal residues resulted in loss of AIM inhibition of the A1 domain. Conclusion The AIM is probably composed of residues 1238-1271 (N-AIM) and 1459-1478 (C-AIM). Neither the N-AIM nor the C-AIM alone could fully inhibit binding of the A1 domain to GPIbα.

Background: The binding of the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP)Ibα defines the VWF activity in hemostasis. Recent studies suggest that sequences flanking A1 form cooperatively an autoinhibitory module (AIM) that reduces the accessibility of the GPIbα binding site on A1. Application of a tensile force induces unfolding of the AIM. Desialylation induces spontaneous binding of plasma VWF to platelets. Most O-glycans in VWF are located around the A1 domain. Removing certain O-glycans in the flanking sequences by site-directed mutagenesis enhances A1 binding to GPIbα and produces an effect similar to type 2B von Willebrand disease in animals. Objectives: To understand if and how desialylation of O-glycans in the flanking sequences increases A1 activity. Methods: A recombinant AIM-A1 fragment encompassing VWF residues 1238-1493 and only O-glycans was treated with neuraminidase to produce desialylated protein. The glycan structure, dynamics, stability, and function of the desialylated protein was characterized by biochemical and biophysical methods and compared to the sialylated fragment.Results: Asialo-AIM-A1 exhibited increased binding activity and induced more apparent platelet aggregation than its sialylated counterpart. It exhibited a lower melting temperature, and increased hydrogen-deuterium exchange rates at residues near the secondary GPIbα binding site and the N-terminal flanking sequence. Asialo-AIM-A1 is less mechanically stable than sialo-AIM-A1, with its unstressed unfolding rate approximately 3-fold greater than the latter.Conclusions: Desialylation of O-glycans around A1 increases its activity by destabilizing the AIM.