Recent reports investigating the value of basal inhibin B determination as a predictor of ovarian reserve and assisted reproduction treatment have led to discordant results. This study was undertaken to further assess the relative power of day 3 inhibin B and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (defined before treatment) and the woman's age both as single and combined predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme. A total of 120 women undergoing their first cycle of IVF or ICSI was included. Forty consecutive cycles cancelled because of poor follicular response were initially selected. As a control group, the nearest completed IVF/ICSI cycles before and after each cancelled cycle (i.e. the closest cycles in temporal relationship to the index cycle) were used. Mean age and basal FSH concentrations were significantly higher in the cancelled than in the control group (P: < 0.01 and P: < 0.001 respectively), whereas basal inhibin B was significantly higher in the latter (P: < 0.05). The association of basal FSH (with an accuracy or predictive value of ovarian response of 79%) with cancellation rate was significant, independent of, and stronger than the effects of age and inhibin B (P: < 0.05). Any two or all three of these variables studied did not improve the predictive value of FSH alone. Woman's age was the only variable independently associated with pregnancy rate. It is concluded that the stronger predictors of success in patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment cycle are age and basal FSH rather than inhibin B. Basal FSH concentration was a better predictor of cancellation rate than age, but age was a stronger predictor of pregnancy rate.
NC-IVF is a feasible and "patient-friendly" option to be offered to young patients, independent of their ovarian reserve status.
Purpose : To investigate the relative power of HCG, estradiol, and progesterone determinations in the prediction of pregnancy outcome after IVF. These prognostic hormonal factors were studied as single and combined predictors. Methods : Serum concentrations of β-HCG, progesterone, and estradiol were measured 12-13 days after embryo transfer (study point 1) and 7 days later (study point 2) in a series of 20 consecutive infertile patients having a first-trimester spontaneous clinical abortion after an IVF-embryo transfer cycle. As a control group (n = 60), the next three IVF-embryo transfer cycles resulting in an ongoing pregnancy after each miscarried IVF cycle in our assisted reproduction program was used. The discrimination attained between the two study groups (ongoing pregnancies and miscarriages) was evaluated by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results : Mean hormone concentrations at study points 1 and 2 were higher in the ongoing pregnancy than in the abortion group. Regarding pregnancy outcome the percentage increment of HCG serum levels (≥1321%), with an accuracy (predictive value of pregnancy outcome) of 81.2% (sensitivity 98%, specificity 50%), had the best prognostic reliability but no significant differences were found when this parameter was compared with the predictive value of HCG concentration (≥72 IU/l) at study point 1 (diagnostic accuracy 80.5%; sensitivity 70%; specificity 80%). When ROC analysis was used, the best predictor of ongoing pregnancy according to the AUC ROC was HCG concentration at study point 2 but again no significant differences were found when this parameter was compared with the predictive value of HCG serum levels at study point 1. A multiple marker strategy did not help distinguish viable from nonviable pregnancies. Conclusion : A single, early (days 12-13 after embryo transfer) HCG quantitative serum measurement in IVF cycles not only is diagnostic but also has good predictive value for pregnancy outcome.
At present, there is considerable debate about the utility of supplemental LH in assisted reproduction treatment. In order to explore this, the present authors used a depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) protocol combined with recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The response to either rhFSH (75 IU FSH/ampoule; group rhFSH, 25 patients) or HMG (75 IU FSH and 75 IU LH/ampoule; group HMG, 25 patients) was compared in normo-ovulatory women suppressed with a depot triptorelin injection and candidates for ICSI. A fixed regimen of 150 IU rhFSH or HMG was administered in the first 14 days of treatment. Treatment was monitored with transvaginal pelvic ultrasonographic scans and serum measurement of FSH, LH, oestradiol, androstenedione, testosterone, progesterone, inhibin A, inhibin B and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at 2-day intervals. Although oestradiol serum concentrations on the day of HCG injection were similar, both the duration of treatment and the per cycle gonadotrophin dose were lower in group HMG. In the initial 16 days of gonadotrophin treatment, the area under the curve (AUC) of LH, oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin B were higher in group HMG; no differences were seen for the remaining hormones measured, including the inhibin B:inhibin A ratio. The dynamics of ovarian follicle development during gonadotrophin treatment were similar in both study groups, but there were more leading follicles (>17 mm in diameter) on the day of HCG injection in the rhFSH group. The number of oocytes, mature oocytes and good quality zygotes and embryos obtained were significantly increased in the rhFSH group. It is concluded that in IVF patients undergoing pituitary desensitization with a depot agonist preparation, supplemental LH may be required in terms of treatment duration and gonadotrophin consumption. However, both oocyte, embryo yield and quality were significantly higher with the use of rhFSH.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.