These data indicate that the addition of GOS (5 g/L) to a follow-on formula positively influences the bifidobacteria flora and the stool consistency in infants during the supplementation period at weaning. No local or systemic side effects were recorded.

Background The treatment of celiac disease (CD) is a lifelong gluten-free diet (GFD). The current methods for monitoring GFD conformance, such as a dietary questionnaire or serology tests, may be inaccurate in detecting dietary transgressions, and duodenal biopsies are invasive, expensive, and not a routine monitoring technique. Objectives Our aim was to determine the clinical usefulness of urine gluten immunogenic peptides (GIP) as a biomarker monitoring GFD adherence in celiac patients and to evaluate the concordance of the results with the degree of mucosal damage. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving 22 de novo CD patients, 77 celiac patients consuming a GFD, and 13 nonceliac subjects. On 3 d of the week, urine samples were collected and the GIP concentrations were tested. Simultaneously, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, questionnaire results, clinical manifestations, and histological findings were analyzed. Results Approximately 24% (18 of 76) of the celiac patients consuming a GFD exhibited Marsh II–III mucosal damage. Among this population, 94% (17 of 18) had detectable urine GIP; however, between 60% and 80% were asymptomatic and exhibited negative serology and appropriate GFD adherence based on the questionnaire. In contrast, 97% (31 of 32) of the celiac patients without duodenal damage had no detectable GIP. These results demonstrated the high sensitivity (94%) and negative predictive value (97%) of GIP measurements in relation to duodenal biopsy findings. In the de novo CD-diagnosed cohort, 82% (18 of 22) of patients had measurable amounts of GIP in the urine. Conclusions Determining GIP concentrations in several urine samples may be an especially convenient approach to assess recent gluten exposure in celiac patients and appears to accurately predict the absence of histological lesions. The introduction of GIP testing as an assessment technique for GFD adherence may help in ascertaining dietary compliance and to target the most suitable intervention during follow-up.

Objective. To investigate the involvement of the CIAS1/PYPAF1/NALP3 gene in 7 unrelated Spanish families with recurrent autoinflammatory diseases characterized by early onset, recurrent fever, and a chronic urticarial rash, in whom a clinical diagnosis of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) is suspected.Methods. Clinical symptoms, results of laboratory analyses, and data on previous treatments in members of the 7 families were recorded on a questionnaire specific for hereditary autoinflammatory diseases. All coding regions and intronic flanking boundaries of the CIAS1/PYPAF1/NALP3 gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and sequenced.Results. Five different missense mutations, including 2 de novo and 1 previously unreported mutation (R488K), were identified in exon 3 of the CIAS1/ PYPAF1/NALP3 gene in 5 of the 7 affected families. Expanded genetic analysis among the healthy individuals identified incomplete penetrance in 2 families. No mutations were found in 2 of the 3 patients with chronic infantile neurologic, cutaneous, articular (CINCA) syndrome/neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID).Conclusion. The clinical data suggested a diagnosis of familial cold-induced autoinflammatory syndrome in 3 families, CINCA/NOMID syndrome in 3 others, and a possible Muckle-Wells syndrome, whereas mutational analysis showed different CIAS1/PYPAF1/NALP3 missense mutations in 5 families. These data are consistent with a common molecular basis of these diseases and highlights the phenotypic heterogeneity among CIAS1/ PYPAF1/NALP3 gene-associated syndromes. The previously unreported mutation and the incomplete penetrance found in 2 families expand the genetic basis underlying these autoinflammatory syndromes. These findings should alert clinicians to the possible genetic basis of these conditions, even in the absence of a family history, in their attempts to establish an accurate diagnosis and the optimal therapeutic approach.

Summary Background Thiopurines are the most widely used immunosuppressants in IBD although drug‐related adverse events (AE) occur in 20%‐30% of cases. Aim To evaluate the safety of thiopurines in elderly IBD patients Methods Cohort study including all adult patients in the ENEIDA registry who received thiopurines. Patients were grouped in terms of age at the beginning of thiopurine treatment, specifically in those who started thiopurines over 60 years or between 18 and 50 years of age. Thiopurine‐related AEs registered in the ENEIDA database were compared. Results Out of 48 752 patients, 1888 started thiopurines when over 60 years of age and 15 477 under 50 years of age. Median treatment duration was significantly shorter for those who started thiopurines >60 years (13 [IQR 2‐55] vs 32 [IQR 5‐82] months; P < .001). Patients starting >60 years had higher rates of all types of myelotoxicity, digestive intolerance and hepatotoxicity. Thiopurines were discontinued due to AEs (excluding malignancies and infections) in more patients starting >60 years (67.2% vs 63.1%; P < .001). Elderly age and female sex were independent risk factors for most AEs. Conclusion In elderly IBD patients, thiopurines are associated with an increased risk of non‐infectious, non‐neoplastic, AEs.

Background and Aims To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with IBD after switching from Remicade® to CT-P13 in comparison with patients who maintain Remicade®. Methods Patients under Remicade® who were in clinical remission with standard dosage at study entry were included. The ‘switch cohort’ [SC] comprised patients who made the switch from Remicade® to CT-P13, and the ‘non-switch’ cohort [NC] patients remained under Remicade®. Results A total of 476 patients were included: 199 [42%] in the SC and 277 [58%] in the NC. The median follow-up was 18 months in the SC and 23 months in the NC [p < 0.01]. Twenty-four out of 277 patients relapsed in the NC; the incidence of relapse was 5% per patient-year. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 2% at 6 months and 10% at 24 months in this group. Thirty-eight out of 199 patients relapsed in the SC; the incidence rate of relapse was 14% per patient-year. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 5% at 6 months and 28% at 24 months. In the multivariate analysis, the switch to CT-P13 was associated with a higher risk of relapse (HR = 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2–6). Thirteen percent of patients had adverse events in the NC, compared with 6% in the SC [p < 0.05]. Conclusions Switching from Remicade® to CT-P13 might be associated with a higher risk of clinical relapse, although this fact was not supported in our study by an increase in objective markers of inflammation. The nocebo effect might have influenced this result. Switching from Remicade® to CT-P13 was safe.