Differences in bone mineral density (BMD) patterns have been recently reported between multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT/MEN1) and sporadic primary HPT. However, studies on the early and later outcomes of bone/renal complications in HPT/MEN1 are lacking. In this cross-sectional study, performed in a tertiary academic hospital, 36 patients cases with uncontrolled HPT from 8 unrelated MEN1 families underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning of the proximal one-third of the distal radius (1/3DR), femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine (LS). The mean age of the patients was 38.9 AE 14.5 years. Parathyroid hormone (PTH)/calcium values were mildly elevated despite an overall high percentage of bone demineralization (77.8%). In the younger group (<50 years of age), demineralization in the 1/3DR was more frequent, more severe, and occurred earlier (40%; Z-score À1.81 AE 0.26). The older group (>50 years of age) had a higher frequency of bone demineralization at all sites ( p < .005) and a larger number of affected bone sites ( p < .0001), and BMD was more severely compromised in the 1/3DR ( p ¼ .007) and LS ( p ¼ .002). BMD values were lower in symptomatic (88.9%) than in asymptomatic HPT patients ( p < .006). Patients with long-standing HPT (>10 years) and gastrinoma/HPT presented significantly lower 1/3DR BMD values. Urolithiasis occurred earlier (<30 years) and more frequently (75%) and was associated with related renal comorbidities (50%) and renal insufficiency in the older group (33%). Bone mineral-and urolithiasis-related renal complications in HPT/MEN1 are early-onset, frequent, extensive, severe, and progressive. These data should be considered in the individualized clinical/surgical management of patients with MEN1-associated HPT. ß

Objective: Only few large families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) have been documented. Here, we aimed to investigate the clinical features of a seven-generation Brazilian pedigree, which included 715 at-risk family members. Design: Genealogical and geographic analysis was used to identify the MEN1 pedigree. Clinical and genetic approach was applied to characterize the phenotypic and genotypic features of the family members. Results: Our genetic data indicated that a founding mutation in the MEN1 gene has occurred in this extended Brazilian family. Fifty family members were diagnosed with MEN1. Very high frequencies of functioning and non-functioning MEN1-related tumors were documented and the prevalence of prolactinoma (29.6%) was similar to that previously described in prolactinoma-variant Burin (32%). In addition, bone mineral density analysis revealed severe osteoporosis (T, K2.87G0.32) of compact bone (distal radius) in hyperparathyroidism (HPT)/MEN1 patients, while marked bone mineral loss in the lumbar spine (T, K1.95G0.39), with most cancellous bone, and femoral neck (mixed composition; T, K1.48G0.27) were also present. Conclusions: In this study, we described clinically and genetically the fifth largest MEN1 family in the literature. Our data confirm previous findings suggesting that prevalence of MEN1-related tumors in large families may differ from reports combining cumulative data of small families. Furthermore, we were able to evaluate the bone status in HPT/MEN1 cases, a subject that has been incompletely approached in the literature. We discussed the bone loss pattern found in our MEN1 patients comparing with that of patients with sporadic primary HPT.European Journal of Endocrinology 159 259-274

METHODS:The clinical diagnosis of MEN1 was made in accordance with the Consensus on multiple endocrine neoplasias. Mutation analysis of the entire MEN1 tumor suppressor gene and genetic screening of at-risk family members were performed by direct sequencing. To analyze the implementation of genetic diagnosis, the studied patients were separated into 3 groups: MEN1 index cases (group I), clinically diagnosed MEN1 cases (group II), and genetically diagnosed MEN1 cases (group III). RESULTS: In total, 154 individuals were clinically and genetically studied. We identified 12 different MEN1 mutations. Fifty-two MEN1 cases were identified: 13 in group I, 28 in group II, and 11 in group III. The mean age in group III (27.0 years) was significantly lower than in groups I (39.5 years) and II (42.4 years; P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). Patients in groups I and II mostly presented 2 or 3 MEN1-related tumors, while 81.8% of those in group III presented 1 or no MEN1-related tumor. Additionally, in group III, 45.4% of cases were asymptomatic, and no metastasis or death was verified. Surveillance for MEN1 mutations allowed the exclusion of 102 noncarriers, including a case of MEN1 phenocopy. CONCLUSION: Our data supports the benefits of clinical and genetic screening for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in the management of this syndrome.

Objective Limited data have been reported on the effect of parathyroidectomy (PTx) on bone mineral density (BMD) in the setting of patients with hyperparathyroidism (HPT) associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). This study investigates the impact of total PTx on BMD in patients with HPT/ MEN1. Design and patients A case series study was performed in a tertiary academic hospital. A total of 16 HPT/MEN1 patients from six families harbouring MEN1 germline mutations were subjected to total PTx followed by parathyroid auto-implant in the forearm. Measurements Bone mineral density values were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results Before PTx, reduced BMD (Z-score <)2AE0) was highly prevalent in the proximal one-third of the distal radius (1/3 DR) (50%), lumbar spine (LS) (43AE7%), ultradistal radius (UDR) (43AE7%), femoral neck (FN) (25%) and total femur (TF) (18AE7%) in the patients. Fifteen months after PTx, we observed a BMD improvement in the LS (from 0AE843 to 0AE909 g/cm 2 ; +8AE4%, P = 0AE001), FN (from 0AE745 to 0AE798 g/cm 2 ; +7AE7%, P = 0AE0001) and TF (from 0AE818 to 0AE874 g/cm 2 ; +6AE9%, P < 0AE0001). No significant change was noticed in the 1/3 DR and UDR after PTx. Conclusions This data confirmed BMD recovery in the LS and FN after PTx in HPT/MEN1 patients. We also documented a significant BMD increase in the TF and no change in both the 1/3 DR and UDR BMD after PTx. Our data suggest that LS and proximal femur are the most informative sites to evaluate the short-term BMD outcome after PTx in HPT/MEN1 subjects.

High frequencies of MEN1 gene mutations were detected in Brazilian families with MEN1, including seven new genetic mutations that are predicted to cause inactivation of the MEN1 tumour suppressor gene. Our data underscore the need to implement a systematic MEN1 screening programme in Brazil.