No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: The critical role of cyclin-dependent kinases in cell division and gene transcription has made them targets for anti-cancer therapies. Positive transcription elongation factor b (PTEFb)/cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) plays a key role in transcription of short-lived anti-apoptotic survival proteins and oncogenes such as MYC and MCL-1. BAY 1251152 (BAY) is a potent and highly selective second generation PTEFb/CDK9 inhibitor. We report here the results of a phase I study to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), maximum tolerated dose and preliminary anti-tumor activity of BAY in patients with AML. Methods: Patients with confirmed AML who are refractory to or have exhausted all available therapies were eligible. A minimum of 3 and a maximum of 9 patients were to be enrolled per dose level in a sequential dose escalation design. BAY was administered intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly for 21-day cycles. PK was assessed at cycle-1, day 1/D8/D15. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) for hematologic events were defined as prolonged grade (G) 4 neutropenia and/or G3 thrombocytopenia and/or any G5 event. DLTs for non-hematological toxicity were any G3-G5 event not clearly resulting from underlying malignancy, among others. Responses were evaluated using Cheson (2003) criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using CTCAE v4.03. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled, 9 of whom failed screening. Twenty one patients received treatment with BAY in 4 dose cohorts: 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg. The median age was 66 (range 20-79), with 62% being male. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1 - 6). Four patients were treated per dose cohorts 1-3 without occurrence of DLTs. Nine patients were treated in cohort 4 (30 mg) and were evaluable for safety, with 7 evaluable for response. Nine patients (43%) discontinued treatment due to clinical progression, 19% due to withdrawal by subject, 19% due to lack of efficacy, 14% due to an AE associated with disease progression. A MTD was not defined. PK assessment indicated that the mean elimination half-life was 3-9 hours with no accumulation over multiple doses. The mean AUC of the 30 mg cohort was within the expected therapeutic exposure range based on preclinical studies. Interestingly, pharmacodynamic assessment of MYC, MCL-1 and PCNA mRNA in whole blood indicated that BAY treatment led to significant, but short-lived, reductions; highest degree of down-regulation was achieved 0.5-4 hours post-dose for MYC, 1-3 hours post-dose for MCL-1, and 1-4 hours post-dose for PCNA. However, no objective responses were observed, with only modest reductions in bone marrow blasts in some patients. In the 30 mg cohort, the longest treatment duration was 63 days. Single patients in each of cohorts 1-3 exceeded this duration but only minimally. Overall treatment-emergent G3/G4 AEs recorded in >10% of patients included anemia (G3 26.7%/G4 6.7%), lung infection (G3 23.3%), neutrophil count decreased (G4 20%), febrile neutropenia (G3 13.3%), and leukocytosis (G3 10%). Clinical laboratory assessments in cohort 4 indicated that 7 of 9 patients (78%) had G4 neutrophil count decreased and G3 anemia, and 5 of 9 (56%) had platelet count decreased. G5 events included 2 each for sepsis and cardiac arrest, and 1 patient with leukocytosis; none of the G5 events were considered related to the study treatment. Conclusions: Treatment of AML patients with BAY did not result in objective responses despite achieving drug levels in the expected therapeutic range and evidence of target engagement. Given the good tolerability and on-target activity, BAY 1251152 might be a good candidate for future combination therapies. Disclosures Ottmann: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Scholz:Bayer: Employment. Ince:Bayer: Employment. Valencia:Bayer: Employment. Souza:Bayer: Employment.

No abstract

Purpose Concomitant treatment with radium-223 and paclitaxel is a potential option for cancer patients with bone metastases; however, myelosuppression risk during coadministration is unknown. This phase Ib study in cancer patients with bone metastases evaluated the safety of radium-223 and paclitaxel. Methods Eligible patients had solid tumor malignancies with ≥2 bone metastases and were candidates for paclitaxel. Treatment included seven paclitaxel cycles (90 mg/m 2 per week intravenously per local standard of care; 3 weeks on/1 week off) plus six radium-223 cycles (55 kBq/kg intravenously; one injection every 4 weeks, starting at paclitaxel cycle 2). The primary end point was percentage of patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia during coadministration of radium-223 and paclitaxel (cycles 2, 3) versus paclitaxel alone (cycle 1). Results Of 22 enrolled patients, 15 were treated (safety population), with 7 completing all six radium-223 cycles. Treated patients had primary cancers of breast ( n = 7), prostate ( n = 4), bladder ( n = 1), non–small cell lung ( n = 1), myxofibrosarcoma ( n = 1), and neuroendocrine ( n = 1). No patients discontinued treatment from toxicity of the combination. In the 13 patients who completed cycle 3, the rates of grade 3 neutropenia in cycles 2 and 3 were 31% and 8%, respectively, versus 23% in cycle 1; there were no cases of grade 4 neutropenia or grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Breast cancer subgroup safety results were similar to the overall safety population. Conclusion Radium-223 was tolerated when combined with weekly paclitaxel, with no clinically relevant additive toxicities. This combination should be explored further in patients with bone metastases. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-018-4234-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.