BackgroundDiabetic foot ulceration is receiving more attention because of its high amputation and mortality rate. It is essential to establish the frequency of amputations in people with diabetes after any change to the management of diabetic foot care. The present study aim to compare the frequency of lower-extremity amputations in patients with diabetes foot ulcer over a ten-year period.MethodsSix hundred forty eight patients with diabetes foot ulcer were retrospectively studied from 2004 to 2013. The clinical features, laboratory results and the lower-extremity amputations were recorded. Major amputation was defined as amputations above the ankle while minor amputation was amputations below the ankle in the present study.ResultsPatients with diabetic foot ulcer were old (age 66.96 ± 11.96 years), with a long duration of diabetes (10.30 ± 6.94 years), high HbA1c (9.19 ± 2.62 %), SBP (144.05 ± 24.18 mmHg), DBP (79.53 ± 11.88 mmHg), LDL-C (2.71 ± 0.93 mmol/L) and had great frequency of neuropathy (62.7 %), retinopathy (45.0 %), nephropathy (39.5 %) and PAD (33.2 %). From 2004 to 2013, the frequency of all lower-extremity amputations is 12.0 % (5.2 % major amputation, 6.8 % minor amputation). The frequency of major amputations decreased from 9.5 % in 2004 and 14.5 % in 2005 to less than 5.0 % after 2006. In particular, there was a significant decline in major amputations of diabetic foot patient with Wagner 3 to 4 wounds. The frequency rate of major amputations in diabetic foot patient with Wagner 3 to 4 wounds fell from 35.7 % in 2004 to 4.4 % after 2007. The change in frequency of minor amputations was fluctuation.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the introduction of a multidisciplinary team, coordinated by an endocrinologist and a podiatrist, for managing diabetic foot disease is associated with a reduction in the frequency of major amputations in patients with diabetes.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components may link to pancreatic cancer risk; however, current epidemiological evidence is limited, and the potential mechanisms underlying the associations remain unclear. To investigate this, we carried out this prospective cohort study of 474 929 participants without a diagnosis of cancer based on UK Biobank dataset. MetS was defined according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria and pancreatic cancer was identified through linkage to UK cancer registries (median follow-up time: 6.6 years). We evaluated hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) with Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for demography and lifestyle factors. Restricted cubic spline was performed for each MetS component to investigate their possible nonlinear associations with risk of pancreatic cancer. During 3 112 566 person-years of follow-up, 565 cases of pancreatic cancer were identified. Individuals with MetS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI, 1.09-1.56), central obesity (HR = 1.24, 95% CI, 1.02-1.50) and hyperglycemia (HR = 1.60, 95% CI, 1.31-1.97) had increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Higher waist circumference (WC) and blood glucose were independently associated with pancreatic cancer, with no evidence against nonlinearity. Although elevated CRP (≥1.00 mg/dL) showed a positive association with the risk for pancreatic cancer, the effect was substantially increased only in participants with MetS and CRP ≥1.00 mg/dL. Our study demonstrated a positive association between MetS and increased risk of pancreatic cancer, with two of the MetS components, WC and blood glucose, showing independent associations in linear manner. Our study also suggested a potential joint effect of MetS and CRP in pancreas tumorigenesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.