BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system disease associated with irreversible progression of disability, which imposes a substantial socioeconomic onus. The objective of this study was to determine the economic impact of multiple sclerosis from the Brazilian household and healthcare system perspectives. Secondary objectives were to assess the impact of fatigue on daily living and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of MS patients.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study in which Brazilian eligible patients attending eight major MS specialized sites answered an interview capturing data on demographics, disease characteristics and severity, comorbidities, resource utilization, fatigue, utilities and health-related quality of life from November/2011 to May/2012 . Costs were assessed considering a prevalence-based approach within 1 year of resource consumption and were estimated by multiplying the amount used by the corresponding unit cost. Patients were classified as having mild, moderate or severe disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).ResultsIn total, 210 patients who met eligibility criteria were included, 40 % had mild, 43 % moderate and 16 % severe disability; disability level was missing for 1 %. The average total direct cost per year was USD 19,012.32 (SD = 10,465.96), and no statistically significant differences were not observed according to MS disability level (p = 0.398). The use of disease modifying therapies (DMTs) corresponded to the majority of direct expenditures, especially among those patients with lower levels of disability, representing around 90 % of total costs for mild and moderate MS patients. It was also observed that expenses with medical (except DMTs) and non-medical resources are higher among patients with more severe disease. Worsening disability also had an important influence on health-related quality of life and self-perceived impact of fatigue on daily living.ConclusionOur data demonstrates the significant economic impact of MS on both Brazilian household and health system, in terms of DMTs and other disease management costs. When patients move upwards on the disease severity scale, costs with health resources other than drugs are significantly increased.

Purpose Type 2 diabetes–related polyneuropathy (DPN) is associated with increased vascular events and mortality, but determinants and outcomes of pain in DPN are poorly understood. We sought to examine the effect of neuropathic pain on vascular events and mortality in patients without DPN, DPN with pain (DPN + P), and DPN without pain (DPN-P). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted within a large health system of adult patients with type 2 diabetes from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2016. Using an electronic algorithm, patients were classified as no DPN, DPN + P, or DPN-P. Primary outcomes included number of vascular events and time to mortality. Independent associations with DPN + P were evaluated using multivariable negative binomial and Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic characteristics, and comorbidities. Results Of 43 945 patients with type 2 diabetes (age 64.6 ± 14.0 years; 52.1% female), 13 910 (31.7%) had DPN: 9104 DPN + P (65.4%) vs 4806 DPN-P (34.6%). Vascular events occurred in 4538 (15.1%) of no DPN patients, 2401 (26.4%) DPN + P, and 1006 (20.9%) DPN-P. After adjustment, DPN + P remained a significant predictor of number of vascular events (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.55, 95% CI, 1.29-1.85), whereas no DPN was protective (IRR = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.60-0.82), as compared to DPN-P. Compared to DPN-P, DPN + P was also a significant predictor of mortality (hazard ratio = 1.42, 95% CI, 1.25-1.61). Conclusions Our study found a significant association between pain in DPN and an increased risk of vascular events and mortality. This observation warrants longitudinal study of the risk factors and natural history of pain in DPN.

Pediatric multiple sclerosis is associated with challenges in prompt diagnosis and uncertainty regarding optimal treatment. This review aimed to identify treatment guidelines or consensus statements for pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved treatment options for pediatric multiple sclerosis, and any randomized controlled trials and observational studies examining available pharmacologic treatments in the pediatric multiple sclerosis population. Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE (1946-2016), EMBASE (1974-2016), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify treatment guidelines or consensus statements, pediatric multiple sclerosis treatment approvals, and randomized controlled trials and observation studies that examine the safety and effectiveness of available disease-modifying therapies. Only 3 consensus statements provided recommendations for pharmacologic treatments for children, all 3 published before the most recent revisions of the pediatric multiple sclerosis diagnostic guidelines. Despite the changes to the clinical landscape of pediatric multiple sclerosis with the introduction of diagnostic guidelines, fingolimod is the only FDA-approved treatment for pediatric multiple sclerosis in the United States. The effectiveness and safety of other disease-modifying therapies suggested by consensus statements have been reported in relatively small prospective and retrospective observational studies. Clinical evidence from a recently completed randomized controlled trial and future global registries can inform treatment decisions for the pediatric multiple sclerosis population.