* Authors on the Steering Committee contributed equally to the oversight of the study, including study design and maintaining the quality of study conduct. CONTRIBUTORS Owen O'Connor, Barbara Pro, Tim Illidge and Lorenz Trumper formed the ECHELON-2 steering committee and contributed equally to the oversight of the study, including study design and maintaining the quality of study conduct.

A B S T R A C T PurposeAlthough rituximab (R) is commonly used for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) requiring treatment, the optimal associated chemotherapy regimen has yet to be clarified. Patients and MethodsWe conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial among adult patients with previously untreated stages II to IV FL to compare efficacy of eight doses of R associated with eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) or six cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or six cycles of fludarabine and mitoxantrone (FM). The principal end point of the study was time to treatment failure (TTF). ResultsThere were 534 patients enrolled onto the study. Overall response rates were 88%, 93%, and 91% for R-CVP, R-CHOP, and R-FM, respectively (P ϭ .247). After a median follow-up of 34 months, 3-year TTFs were 46%, 62%, and 59% for the respective treatment groups (R-CHOP v R-CVP, P ϭ .003; R-FM v R-CVP, P ϭ .006; R-FM v R-CHOP, P ϭ .763). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 52%, 68%, and 63% (overall P ϭ .011), respectively, and 3-year overall survival was 95% for the whole series. R-FM resulted in higher rates of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (64%) compared with R-CVP (28%) and R-CHOP (50%; P Ͻ .001). Overall, 23 second malignancies were registered during follow-up: four in R-CVP, five in R-CHOP, and 14 in R-FM. ConclusionIn this study, R-CHOP and R-FM were superior to R-CVP in terms of 3-year TTF and PFS. In addition, R-CHOP had a better risk-benefit ratio compared with R-FM. Oncol 31:1506Oncol 31: -1513 J Clin

In this randomized multicenter study of 136 patients, 6 courses of CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) followed by rituximab (CHOP-R) were compared with rituximabsupplemented high-dose sequential chemotherapy with autografting (R-HDS) to assess the value of intensified chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for highrisk follicular lymphoma (FL) after the introduction of monoclonal antibodies. The analysis was intention to treat with event-free survival (EFS) as the primary endpoint. Complete remission (CR) was 62% with CHOP-R and 85% with R-HDS (P < .001). At a median follow-up (MFU) of 51 months, the 4-year EFS was 28% and 61%, respectively (P < .001), with no difference in overall survival (OS). Molecular remission (MR) was achieved in 44% of CHOP-R and 80% of R-HDS patients (P < .001), and was the strongest independent outcome predictor. Patients relapsing after CHOP-R underwent salvage R-HDS in 71% of cases. Salvage R-HDS had an 85% CR rate and a 68% 3-year EFS (MFU, 30 months). We conclude that (1) achieving MR is critical for effective disease control, regardless of which treatment is used; IntroductionIn the last 15 years, our approach to treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) has evolved considerably, chiefly due to 3 major achievements. First, new agents, particularly rituximab, have improved overall outcome in patients with FL. 1,2 Second, a subset of patients with a rapid and progressive course has been recognized. [3][4][5] The International Prognostic Index (IPI), the age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI), and more recent FL-specific scores such as the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi (IIL) score and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) now allow simple and effective identification of these high-risk patients, whose management is currently far from satisfactory. 4,5 Finally, many phase 2 studies have demonstrated that the achievement of molecular remission (MR) as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is associated with a better outcome in the context of a wide array of different treatments. [6][7][8][9][10][11] In this rapidly evolving field, the place for intensified regimens with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is poorly defined. Most data arise from pre-rituximab studies. [12][13][14][15][16] ASCT improves overall survival (OS) in relapsed patients, 7,12 while data at diagnosis are less clear. The 3 phase 3 studies published so far The online version of this article contains a data supplement.The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked ''advertisement'' in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. For personal use only. on May 7, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From have been based on total body irradiation (TBI)-containing regimens, did not select patients according to validated prognostic scores, and did not include molecular analysis. [13][14][15] Two of these trials showed that intensive therapy ensures better progression-free survi...

APL patients receiving all-trans retinoic acid in addition to chemotherapy have no increased risk of developing EMD at relapse as compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone.