Allografts of the forearm are still uncommon in the field of composite tissue allograft transplantation. In November 2007, a right-hand allograft and a left-hand/full-length forearm allograft were transplanted in a 30-year-old man who lost both hands and the vision in his left eye due to an explosion. The patient underwent alemtuzumab and steroid induction therapy. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and low doses of steroids were given to prevent rejection. The allografts were rejected 3 times, but these episodes were controlled successfully. The immunosuppressive regimen was switched from tacrolimus to sirolimus because of increased serum creatinine. The left allograft showed a flexion contracture due to muscle fibrosis that was conjectured to be associated with a perioperative ischemic injury and permitted only a Moberg-type key pinch. In contrast, an excellent grade of function was observed in the right allograft. The Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand score improved from 70.83 to 36.6 and intrinsic musculature returned to both allografts. The patient was able to work 2 years after transplantation. This is the first report of an ischemic injury related to the successful allotransplantation of a composite tissue.

These findings suggest that alemtuzumab may not prevent cell-mediated rejection of a hand allograft transplant. Furthermore, C4d deposition warrants attention in clinical composite tissue allotransplants.

No abstract

The frequency and prognostic significance of the histologic type in early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) is not as well established as in advanced stages. In addition, histologic typing based only on morphologic features may be difficult, especially in high-grade tumors. In this study, we have analyzed a prospective cohort of 502 early-stage OCs to investigate their frequency, immunohistochemical characteristics, and survival of the 5 main histologic types. Histotype was assigned according to not only the morphologic features but also according to the expression pattern of WT1, p53, Napsin A, and progesterone receptors. In addition, an extended panel including p16, β-catenin, HER2, Arid1A, HINF1B, CK7, CDX2, and CK20 was used to refine the diagnosis in difficult cases. In this series, the frequency of the 5 major histologic types was as follows: endometrioid carcinoma, 32.7%; clear cell carcinoma, 25.1%; high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), 24.7%; mucinous carcinoma, 10.2%; low-grade serous carcinoma, 4.6%; and others, 2.8%. The combination of morphology and immunohistochemistry allowed the reclassification of 23% of OCs. The lowest concordance was found between samples initially diagnosed as endometrioid, but finally classified as high-grade serous tumors (22% error rate). Endometrioid carcinoma was the most favorable histologic type, whereas HGSC and low-grade serous carcinoma had the worst prognosis. Clear cell carcinoma with abnormal p53 immunostaining pattern also had poor prognosis. Although histologic grade was not a prognostic factor among early-stage endometrioid OCs, distinction between grade 3 endometrioid OC and HGSC is recommended, taking into account differences in prognosis and molecular alterations that can guide different treatments.