Rochet, M-J., Prigent, M., Bertrand, J. A., Carpentier, A., Coppin, F., Delpech, J-P., Fontenelle, G., Foucher, E., Mahé, K., Rostiaux, E., and Trenkel, V. M. 2008. Ecosystem trends: evidence for agreement between fishers' perceptions and scientific information. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 1057–1068. The results of a survey on fishers' perceptions of recent changes in the eastern English Channel ecosystem carried out in 2006 were compared with fishery and bottom-trawl survey data. A hypothesis-testing framework was used, testing the null hypothesis that fishers' statements were true, which permitted evaluation of both agreement and disagreement. Overall good agreement between fishers' statements and scientific data was found, and both sources suggested that the fish community in the Channel is undergoing large changes, among which are decreases in some commercially important species; in addition, a number of human pressures impact the ecosystem. Fishers had an accurate perception of changes and their time-frames, but not necessarily of their causes. They had a greater power than survey data to detect recent changes, showing that fishers' perceptions have great potential as early warning signals.

We present a method for combining individual indicator results into a comprehensive diagnostic of fishing impacts on fish populations and communities. A conceptual framework for interpreting combined trends in a set of simple indicators is proposed, relying beforehand on qualitative expectations anchored in ecological theory. The initial state of the community is first assessed using published information. Which combinations of trends are acceptable or undesirable is decided, depending on the initial status. The indicators are then calculated from a time-series and their time trends are estimated as the slopes of linear models. Finally, the test results are combined within the predefined framework, providing a diagnostic on the dynamics of fishing impacts on populations and communities. The method is demonstrated for nine coastal and shelf-sea fish communities monitored by French surveys. Most communities were persistently or increasingly impacted by fishing. In addition, climate change seems to have contributed to changes in East Atlantic communities. Cet article propose une méthode utilisant des indicateurs pour élaborer un diagnostic sur les effets de la pêche sur les populations et les peuplements de poissons. Un cadre conceptuel permet d'interpréter les tendances conjointes d'indicateurs à partir de la théorie écologique. L'état initial du peuplement est d'abord évalué sur la base d'informations publiées. En fonction de l'état initial et des objectifs de gestion, les combinaisons des tendances sont qualifiées d'indésirables ou satisfaisantes. Les indicateurs sont ensuite estimés à partir de données de campagnes de pêches scientifiques: abondance et longueur moyenne d'une sélection de populations, nombre, biomasse totale, poids moyen et longueur moyenne dans le peuplement, et la pente du spectre de taille multispécifique. Les tendances temporelles de ces indicateurs sont testées au moyen d'un modèle linéaire, et les résultats des tests sont combinés en un diagnostic final. La méthode est mise en œuvre pour neuf peuplements de poissons côtiers et du plateau continental, suivis par des campagnes françaises. Il en résulte que la plupart de ces peuplements sont affectés par la pêche de manière stationnaire ou croissante. Par ailleurs, les changements climatiques dans l'Atlantique Nord-Est contribuent aussi à des modifications dans les peuplements de poissons de cette région.

Generalised Linear Models, combined with a Geographic Information System, were used to map the habitats of ten demersal elasmobranch taxa (five skates, four sharks and a stingray) in the eastern English Channel, based on an annual fishery-independent bottom trawl survey conducted each October, and covering 21 years. Habitat models showing mean density levels were developed for the most frequently occurring species, whilst binomial occurrence habitat models were built for less frequent species. The main predictors of elasmobranch habitats in the eastern English Channel were depth, bed shear stress and salinity, followed by seabed sediment type and temperature. Habitat maps highlighted contrasting habitat utilisation across species. Raja clavata, and to a lesser extent Scyliorhinus canicula, showed ontogenetic differences in habitat utilisation, with early life history stages found in shallow coastal waters, sheltered from strong tidal currents and typically with softer sediments. Spatial segregation by sex was also evident for S. canicula, with females found at higher densities on some harder grounds in the study area. An improved knowledge of habitat utilisation by elasmobranchs (particularly for important life history stages and all seasons) is required if spatial management is to be considered for these species. Highlights ► GLMs and GIS were used to map the habitats of five skates, four sharks and a stingray. ► Predictors used included depth, sediment type, bed stress, temperature and salinity. ► Habitat maps highlighted contrasting habitat utilisation across elasmobranch species. ► Two species showed ontogenetic differences in habitat utilisation. ► Spatial segregation by sex was found for one species.

Delavenne, J., Metcalfe, K., Smith, R. J., Vaz, S., Martin, C. S., Dupuis, L., Coppin, F., and Carpentier, A. 2012. Systematic conservation planning in the eastern English Channel: comparing the Marxan and Zonation decision-support tools. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69: 75–83. The systematic conservation approach is now commonly used for the design of efficient marine protected area (MPA) networks, and identifying these priority areas often involves using specific conservation-planning software. Several such software programmes have been developed in recent years, each differing in the underlying algorithms used. Here, an investigation is made into whether the choice of software influences the location of priority areas by comparing outputs from Marxan and Zonation, two widely used conservation-planning, decision-support tools. Using biological and socio-economic data from the eastern English Channel, outputs are compared and it is shown that the two software packages identified similar sets of priority areas, although the relatively wide distribution of habitat types and species considered offered much flexibility. Moreover, the similarity increased with increasing spatial constraint, especially when using real-world cost data, suggesting that the choice of cost metric has a greater influence on conservation-planning analyses than the choice of software. However, Marxan generally produced more efficient results and Zonation produced results with greater connectivity, so the most appropriate software package will depend on the overall goals of the MPA planning process.

Summary 1. The development of ecosystem approaches to environmental management implies the need to account for multiple pressures on ecosystems. Trends in multiple metrics that respond differently to changes in major environmental pressures need to be combined to evaluate the impacts of fishing and environmental changes on fish communities. 2. An exploited fish community is viewed as a three‐level food chain in which the two upper levels, or functional groups, are targeted by fishing fleets, while the lowest level is subject to environmental variation. Qualitative modelling is used to predict changes at the two upper levels, that is, top‐down vs. bottom‐up perturbations. Abundance and length metrics are calculated from survey data for 14 Mediterranean and East‐Atlantic groundfish shelf communities at both population and functional group levels. The joint likelihood of time trends in metrics is used to evaluate the evidence for different causes of changes. 3. A wide diversity of impacts is found to have equal evidence at the population level within each community. Consistency between the impacts identified and changes in pressures known from independent information is found at the functional group and community level. The results suggest that there is some compensation between species within functional groups. 4. Synthesis and applications. The method can be used to conduct an integrated assessment of community dynamics subject to multiple pressures. Joint trends in metrics provide evidence of which known pressures are having an impact on the community, and thus, which management actions should be taken to mitigate these changes.