During organogenesis, immunosurveillance, and inflammation, chemokines selectively recruit leukocytes by activating seventransmembrane-spanning receptors. It has been suggested that an important component of this process is the formation of a haptotactic gradient by immobilization of chemokines on cell surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). However, this hypothesis has not been experimentally demonstrated in vivo. In the present study we investigated the effect of mutations in the GAG binding sites of three chemokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1͞CC chemokine ligand (CCL)2, macrophage-inflammatory protein-1␤͞ CCL4, and RANTES͞CCL5, on their ability to recruit cells in vivo. These mutant chemokines retain chemotactic activity in vitro, but they are unable to recruit cells when administered intraperitoneally. Additionally, monomeric variants, although fully active in vitro, are devoid of activity in vivo. These data demonstrate that both GAG binding and the ability to form higher-order oligomers are essential for the activity of particular chemokines in vivo, although they are not required for receptor activation in vitro. Thus, quaternary structure of chemokines and their interaction with GAGs may significantly contribute to the localization of leukocytes beyond migration patterns defined by chemokine receptor interactions.

Chemokines are 8-10 kDa proteins involved in the control of leukocyte trafficking and activation. In free solution, chemokines are monomers at physiologic concentrations, although many multimerize at higher concentrations. Cell surface heparan sulfate may sequester chemokines, increasing their local concentrations and facilitating their binding to receptors expressed on leukocytes. In competitive binding assays using immobilized heparin, a 2-3-fold increase in the bound radiolabeled chemokine was seen with increasing concentrations of unlabeled chemokine in the nanomolar range. Unlabeled chemokine concentrations between 0.25 and 50 microM were needed to compete the bound radioactivity. This biphasic competition curve was not seen for N-methyl-L25 IL-8, a variant of IL-8 which is unable to dimerize. In addition, complexes of chemokine and heparin eluted from gel filtration columns with apparent molecular masses of 33-60 kDa, suggesting that chemokine multimerization had occurred. The physiological relevance of this multimerization process was seen from studies using human endothelial cells. The endothelial cell binding sites for IL-8, RANTES, and MCP-1 were deduced to be glycosaminoglycans since competition assays showed the biphasic curves and micromolar IC50 values seen in studies with immobilized heparin, and mRNA for known chemokine receptors was not detected. Furthermore, digestion of endothelial cell monolayers with glycosaminidases decreased chemokine binding by up to 80%. Glycosaminoglycans can act as modulators of the ligand binding affinity of chemokine receptor-bearing cells. Removal of glycosaminoglycans from CHO cells expressing chemokine receptors CXCR1, CCR1, or CCR2 resulted in 40-70% decreases in the binding of RANTES, MCP-1, IL-8, and MIP-1alpha. Our data show that cell surface glycosaminoglycans induce polymerization of chemokines, increasing their local concentration and therefore enhancing their effects on high-affinity receptors within the local microenvironment.

CCR5, a chemokine receptor expressed on T cells and macrophages, is the principal coreceptor for M-tropic HIV-1 strains. Recently, we described an NH2-terminal modification of the CCR5 ligand regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), aminooxypentane-RANTES (AOP-RANTES), that showed potent inhibition of macrophage infection by HIV-1 under conditions where RANTES was barely effective. To investigate the mechanism of AOP-RANTES inhibition of HIV infectivity we examined the surface expression of CCR5 using a monoclonal anti-CCR5 antibody, MC-1. We demonstrate that AOP-RANTES rapidly caused >90% decrease in cell surface expression of CCR5 on lymphocytes, monocytes/ macrophages, and CCR5 transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. RANTES also caused a loss of cell surface CCR5, although its effect was less than with AOP-RANTES. Significantly, AOP-RANTES inhibited recycling of internalized CCR5 to the cell surface, whereas RANTES did not. When peripheral blood mononuclear cells are cultured for prolonged periods of time in the presence of RANTES, CCR5 expression is comparable to that seen on cells treated with control medium, whereas there is no CCR5 surface expression on cells cultured in the presence of AOP-RANTES. Immunofluorescence indicated that both AOP-RANTES and RANTES induced downmodulation of cell surface CCR5, and that the receptor was redistributed into endocytic organelles containing the transferrin receptor. When RANTES was removed, the internalized receptor was recycled to the cell surface; however, the receptor internalized in the presence of AOP-RANTES was retained in endosomes. Using human osteosarcoma (GHOST) 34/CCR5 cells, the potency of AOP-RANTES and RANTES to inhibit infection by the M-tropic HIV-1 strain, SF 162, correlated with the degree of downregulation of CCR5 induced by the two chemokines. These differences between AOP-RANTES and RANTES in their effect on receptor downregulation and recycling suggest a mechanism for the potent inhibition of HIV infection by AOP-RANTES. Moreover, these results support the notion that receptor internalization and inhibition of receptor recycling present new targets for therapeutic agents to prevent HIV infection.