EPEATED INVASIVE PROCEdures occur routinely in neonates who require intensive care, causing pain at a time when it is developmentally unexpected. 1 Neonates are more sensitive to pain than older infants, children, and adults, 2 and this hypersensitivity is exacerbated in preterm neonates. 3 Multiple lines of evidence suggest that repeated and prolonged pain exposure alters their subsequent pain processing, long-term development, and behavior. 4,5 It is essential, therefore, to prevent or treat pain in neonates. Numerous pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments can alleviate procedural pain in neonates. 6 As a consequence, national 7 and international 6 evidence-based guidelines have been issued for preventing or treating neonatal pain and its adverse consequences. The burden of procedural pain in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has been reported in previous singlecenter studies 8-11 and a multicenter study. 12 The latter study was based on chart review and was not directly observational. Effective strategies to improve pain management in neonates require a better understanding of the epidemiology and management of procedural pain. We report epidemiological data on neonatal pain collected Context Effective strategies to improve pain management in neonates require a clear understanding of the epidemiology and management of procedural pain. Objective To report epidemiological data on neonatal pain collected from a geographically defined region, based on direct bedside observation of neonates.

Study objective: To analyse the relation between preterm birth and working conditions in Europe using common measures of exposure and to test whether employment related risks varied by country of residence. Design: A case-control study in which cases included all consecutive singleton preterm births and controls included one of every ten singleton term births in each participating maternity unit. Data about working conditions were obtained by interview from women after delivery. Setting: Sixteen European countries. Participants: The analysis included 5145 preterm and 7911 term births of which 2369 preterm and 4098 term births were to women employed during pregnancy. Analyses of working conditions were carried out for women working through at least the third month of pregnancy. Main results: Employed women did not have an excess risk of preterm birth. Among working women, a moderate excess risk was observed for women working more than 42 hours a week (OR = 1.33, CI = 1.1 to 1.6), standing more than six hours a day (OR = 1.26, CI = 1.1 to 1.5), and for women with low job satisfaction (OR = 1.27, CI = 1.1 to 1.5). There were stronger links in countries with a lower overall level of perinatal health and a common practice of long prenatal leaves. Conclusion: These findings show that specific working conditions affect the risk of preterm birth. They also suggest employment related risks could be mediated by the social and legislative context. S tudies on the relation between employment and preterm delivery have yielded contradictory results.1 The decision to work during pregnancy reflects a large variety of factors such as education, social support, and health status that are independently linked to the risks of preterm birth. [2][3][4] In many studies, women who are employed have a lower risk of preterm birth than women who are not employed.

No abstract

After completion of this educational activity, the participant should be better able to assess symptoms of dengue fever and locations where dengue fever occurs, describe possible perinatal complications of maternal dengue fever, and identify the limitations of available literature describing dengue fever in pregnancy.

Prolonged sedation and/or analgesia is not associated with a poor 5-year neurological outcome after adjustment for the propensity score.