ACE DD genotype may be considered a risk factor for the development of common carotid intima-media thickening in our study population.

BackgroundThe independent prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) and prediabetes mellitus (pre‐DM) on survival outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure has been investigated in observational registries and randomized, clinical trials, but the results have been often inconclusive or conflicting. We examined the independent prognostic impact of DM and pre‐DM on survival outcomes in the GISSI‐HF (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nella Insufficienza Cardiaca‐Heart Failure) trial.Methods and ResultsWe assessed the risk of all‐cause death and the composite of all‐cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization over a median follow‐up period of 3.9 years among the 6935 chronic heart failure participants of the GISSI‐HF trial, who were stratified by presence of DM (n=2852), pre‐DM (n=2013), and non‐DM (n=2070) at baseline. Compared with non‐DM patients, those with DM had remarkably higher incidence rates of all‐cause death (34.5% versus 24.6%) and the composite end point (63.6% versus 54.7%). Conversely, both event rates were similar between non‐DM patients and those with pre‐DM. Cox regression analysis showed that DM, but not pre‐DM, was associated with an increased risk of all‐cause death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.28–1.60) and of the composite end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.13–1.32), independently of established risk factors. In the DM subgroup, higher hemoglobin A1c was also independently associated with increased risk of both study outcomes (all‐cause death: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02–1.43; and composite end point: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01–1.29, respectively).ConclusionsPresence of DM was independently associated with poor long‐term survival outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure.Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00336336.

In a general population of unselected middle-aged subjects, the presence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy was associated with an increase in intima-media thickness and with the presence of plaque in the carotid arteries, possibly contributing to the worse prognosis observed in this group of patients.

The angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor has a key role in mediating the vasoconstrictor and growth-promoting effects of angiotensin II. It has been reported that a polymorphism of the AT1 receptor gene (an A/C transversion at position 1166) may be associated with cardiovascular phenotypes, such as arterial blood pressure and aortic stiffness, that underlie a condition of increased cardiovascular risk. We examined a sample of 212 subjects randomly selected from a general population in northern Italy to investigate the role of AT1 receptor gene polymorphism, in the regulation of blood pressure and cardiovascular growth. We measured blood pressure (both clinic and 24-hour ambulatory recording), left ventricular mass (echocardiography), and carotid artery wall thickness (B-mode ultrasound); we assessed the AT1 receptor genotype by polymerase chain reaction and allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization. Blood pressure values were lower in CC homozygotes than in heterozygotes and AA homozygotes; the difference was statistically significant for clinic measurements (mean difference for mean blood pressure, -6.6 mm Hg, P = .01; 95% confidence interval, -1.6 to -11.7 mm Hg) but not for ambulatory blood pressure measurements. CC homozygotes also presented a lower incidence of a positive family history of hypertension (P = .027). No statistically significant differences among AT1 receptor A/C1166 genotypes were observed for left ventricular mass or carotid artery wall thickness. We conclude that the present study does not support a major role of the AT1 receptor gene A/C1166 polymorphism as a marker of conditions associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

Background: To evaluate if the positive effects recorded on glycaemic control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) were maintained on the long-term compared with multiple daily injection (MDI). The secondary objective was to evaluate if there is a reduction of type and number of cardiovascular events (CV).Methods: This retrospective, observational study evaluated glycaemic control and the number of CV in 104 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes previously treated with MDI and initiating CSII therapy with tubed insulin pumps compared with 109 patients previously treated with MDI continuing MDI.Results: After 8 years, the glycaemic control including glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and prandial plasma glucose (PPG) improved with both CSII and MDI compared with baseline; however, HbA 1c , FPG, and PPG recorded with CSII were lower than data recorded with MDI. During the 8 years, there were fewer CV events with CSII, compared with MDI, and in particular, there were fewer cases of atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular contractions, acute coronary infarction, angina pectoris, heart failure, and peripheral vascular ischemia. We did not record any reduction of ischemic stroke events. Conclusion:Our preliminary data suggest that CSII treatment seems to reduce the rates of CV compared with MDI therapy. Moreover, CSII also improved glycaemic control, without increasing the number of hypoglycaemia. However, given the observational design of this trial, our data should be validated in a randomized clinical trial; if they will be confirmed, CSII could be chosen for fully informed and motivated patients at higher risk of developing CV.