NK cells are a major component of the antitumor immune response and are involved in controlling tumor progression and metastases in animal models. Here, we show that dysfunction of these cells accompanies human breast tumor progression. We characterized human peripheral blood NK (p-NK) cells and malignant mammary tumor-infiltrating NK (Ti-NK) cells from patients with noninvasive and invasive breast cancers. NK cells isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy donors and normal breast tissue were used as controls. With disease progression, we found that expression of activating NK cell receptors (such as NKp30, NKG2D, DNAM-1, and CD16) decreased while expression of inhibitory receptors (such as NKG2A) increased and that this correlated with decreased NK cell function, most notably cytotoxicity. Importantly, Ti-NK cells had more pronounced impairment of their cytotoxic potential than p-NK cells. We also identified several stroma-derived factors, including TGF-β1, involved in tumor-induced reduction of normal NK cell function. Our data therefore show that breast tumor progression involves NK cell dysfunction and that breast tumors model their environment to evade NK cell antitumor immunity. This highlights the importance of developing future therapies able to restore NK cell cytotoxicity to limit/prevent tumor escape from antitumor immunity. IntroductionBreast cancer (BC) is the primary cause of cancer deaths in women. The main cause of this mortality is the metastatic spread to other organs (1). Metastasis occurs when tumor cells acquire invasive features (2) and the ability to escape from antitumor immunity (3, 4). Defects in antitumor immunity may also facilitate BC occurrence. Indeed, mice deficient in IFN-γ production spontaneously develop mammary tumors (5). Breast tumor cells transplanted into NOD/SCID mice (which lack adaptive immunity) form noninvasive tumors, whereas the same cells transplanted into NOD/SCID/γ-c null mice (no adaptive immunity and no NK cells) form invasive tumors that metastasize rapidly (6). This effect is strictly dependent on NK cells (7). Similarly, in a highly metastatic model, BC metastasized to the lung only after elimination of NK cells by Tregs (8).Advanced BC patients show defects in antitumor immunity, such as alterations of DC maturation (9) and an increase in Treg infiltrates (10). Major impairment of peripheral blood NK cell maturation and cytotoxic functions has also been reported in metastatic BC (11). Several gene expression profiling studies have shown that a better outcome is associated with a strong cytotoxic infiltrate containing NK cells (12)(13)(14)(15). These data suggest that BC progression is linked to antitumor immunity efficiency and particularly to NK cells. However, the precise relationships between NK cells and BC progression in humans have not been studied so far.

Purpose: To examine the role of cancer stem cells (CSC) in mediating metastasis in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and the association of these cells with patient outcome in this aggressive type of breast cancer.Experimental Design: CSCs were isolated from SUM149 and MARY-X, an IBC cell line and primary xenograft, by virtue of increased aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity as assessed by the ALDEFLUOR assay. Invasion and metastasis of CSC populations were assessed by in vitro and mouse xenograft assays. Expression of ALDH1 was determined on a retrospective series of 109 IBC patients and this was correlated with histoclinical data. All statistical tests were two sided. Log-rank tests using Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to determine the correlation of ALDH1 expression with development of metastasis and patient outcome.Results: Both in vitro and xenograft assays showed that invasion and metastasis in IBC are mediated by a cellular component that displays ALDH activity. Furthermore, expression of ALDH1 in IBC was an independent predictive factor for early metastasis and decreased survival in this patient population.Conclusions: These results suggest that the metastatic, aggressive behavior of IBC may be mediated by a CSC component that displays ALDH enzymatic activity. ALDH1 expression represents the first independent prognostic marker to predict metastasis and poor patient outcome in IBC. The results illustrate how stem cell research can translate into clinical practice in the IBC field. Clin Cancer Res; 16(1); 45-55. ©2010 AACR.Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an angioinvasive form of breast cancer associated with a high incidence of early nodal and systemic metastasis. In contrast to the recent decrease in breast cancer incidence in the United States, the annual incidence of IBC continues to increase (1, 2) with an attendant increase in mortality (3). Despite advances in the use of systemic chemotherapy, the prognosis of IBC remains considerably worse than that of other locally advanced breast cancers (1).Several molecular changes have been described in IBC including RHOC overexpression, hypomethylation of caveolin-1 or caveolin-2 promoters, and deletion of the tumor suppressor WISP3 (4-8). In addition, IBCs have been reported to overexpress E-cadherin/α, β-catenin, and angiogenic factors (4,7,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Although each of these genetic changes may contribute to the metastatic nature of IBC, no markers have been described that can predict the development of systemic metastasis or survival in IBC patients. Although ERBB2 expression is associated with aggressive behavior in most breast cancers, this is not the case in IBC (15).There is increasing evidence that human breast cancers are driven by a tumor-initiating "cancer stem cell" (CSC) component that may contribute to tumor metastasis and therapeutic resistance (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Breast CSCs were initially characterized as CD44 + /CD24 − /lin − cells that were capable of serial transplantation in nonobese/severe combined immunodefic...

Medullary breast cancer (MBC) is a rare but enigmatic pathologic type of breast cancer. Despite features of aggressiveness, MBC is associated with a favorable prognosis. Morphologic diagnosis remains difficult in many cases. Very little is known about the molecular alterations involved in MBC. Notably, it is not clear whether MBC and ductal breast cancer (DBC) represent molecularly distinct entities and what genes/proteins might account for their differences. Using whole-genome oligonucleotide microarrays, we compared gene expression profiles of 22 MBCs and 44 grade III DBCs. We show that MBCs are less heterogeneous than DBCs. Whereas different molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, basal, ERBB2-overexpressing, and normal-like) exist in DBCs, 95% MBCs display a basal profile, similar to that of basal DBCs. Supervised analysis identified gene expression signatures that discriminated MBCs from DBCs. Discriminator genes are associated with various cellular processes related to MBC features, in particular immune reaction and apoptosis. As compared with MBCs, basal DBCs overexpress genes involved in smooth muscle cell differentiation, suggesting that MBCs are a distinct subgroup of basal breast cancer with limited myoepithelial differentiation. Finally, MBCs overexpress a series of genes located on the 12p13 and 6p21 chromosomal regions known to contain pluripotency genes. Our results contribute to a better understanding of MBC and of mammary oncogenesis in general.