The lightning flashes used in this work were mapped using data from the LO-FAR (LOw Frequency ARray) radio telescope. Due to its effective lightning protection system, LOFAR is able to continue to operate during thunderstorm activity[1]. The Dutch LOFAR stations consist of 38 (24 core + 14 remote) stations spread over 3200 km 2 in the northern Netherlands. The largest baseline between core stations is about 3 km, the largest baseline between remote stations is about 100 km. From each station we use 6 dual-polarized low band dipole antennas (LBA), sampled at 200 MHz, to observe the 30-80 MHz band. The raw time series data were saved to the transient buffer boards, which continuously buffer the last 5 s of data from a maximum of 48 dual-polarized antennas per station. The resulting relative timing accuracy is better than 1 ns. See [2] for more details on LOFAR. When a lightning flash occurs within the area enclosed by the Dutch LOFAR stations, as observed by www.lightningmaps.org, the transient buffer boards are stopped and the data is read to disk. The method we used to map each lightning flash has three major steps. In the first step we fitted plane-waves to the time of pulses received by individual LOFAR stations. Note that the LOFAR stations are less than 100 m in diameter and the lighting is many kilometers from the closest LOFAR station, so that a plane-wave approximation is very good for individual LOFAR stations. These plane-waves were used to identify non-functional antennas, and the intersection of their arrival directions gave a rough first estimate of the flash location, accurate to a few kilometers. Since each station has its own clock and cable delays, in the second step we found the clock offsets between the different LOFAR stations by simultaneously fitting the locations of multiple events and station clock offsets to the measured times of radio pulses, with a Levenberg-Marquardt minimizer. In order to achieve the highest precision, we chose to fit locations of 5 events that created pulses that were strong but not saturating, had a simple structure, and did not change shape significantly across different stations. After fitting, the root-mean-square difference between the modeled and measured arrival times of the radio pulses was around 1 ns. The resulting station clock offsets are consistent with LOFAR station clock calibrations, which are known

The physical processes affecting the dynamics of the Earth's particle radiation environment are reviewed along with scientific and engineering models developed for its description. The emphasis is on models that are either operational engineering models or R. Vainio ( ) R. Vainio et al. models presently under development for this purpose. Three components of the radiation environment, i.e., galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), solar energetic particles (SEPs) and trapped radiation, are considered separately. In the case of SEP models, we make a distinction between statistical flux/fluence models and those aimed at forecasting events. Models of the effects of particle radiation on the atmosphere are also reviewed. Further, we summarize the main features of the models and discuss the main outstanding issues concerning the models and their possible use in operational space weather forecasting. We emphasize the need for continuing the development of physics-based models of the Earth's particle radiation environment, and their validation with observational data, until the models are ready to be used for nowcasting and/or forecasting the dynamics of the environment.

We evaluate the exposure during nadir observations with JEM-EUSO, the Extreme Universe Space Obser-\ud vatory, on-board the Japanese Experiment Module of the International Space Station. Designed as a mis-\ud sion to explore the extreme energy Universe from space, JEM-EUSO will monitor the Earth’s nighttime\ud atmosphere to record the ultraviolet light from tracks generated by extensive air showers initiated by\ud ultra-high energy cosmic rays. In the present work, we discuss the particularities of space-based obser-\ud vation and we compute the annual exposure in nadir observation. The results are based on studies of the\ud expected trigger aperture and observational duty cycle, as well as, on the investigations of the effects of\ud clouds and different types of background light. We show that the annual exposure is about one order of\ud magnitude higher than those of the presently operating ground-based observatories

The Universe is permeated by hot, turbulent, magnetized plasmas. Turbulent plasma is a major constituent of active galactic nuclei, supernova remnants, the intergalactic and interstellar medium, the solar corona, the solar wind and the Earth’s magnetosphere, just to mention a few examples. Energy dissipation of turbulent fluctuations plays a key role in plasma heating and energization, yet we still do not understand the underlying physical mechanisms involved. THOR is a mission designed to answer the questions of how turbulent plasma is heated and particles accelerated, how the dissipated energy is partitioned and how dissipation operates in different regimes of turbulence. THOR is a single-spacecraft mission with an orbit tuned to maximize data return from regions in near-Earth space – magnetosheath, shock, foreshock and pristine solar wind – featuring different kinds of turbulence. Here we summarize the THOR proposal submitted on 15 January 2015 to the ‘Call for a Medium-size mission opportunity in ESAs Science Programme for a launch in 2025 (M4)’. THOR has been selected by European Space Agency (ESA) for the study phase.