No abstract

Background Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common postoperative complication worldwide. WHO guidelines to prevent SSI recommend alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation and fascial closure using triclosan-coated sutures, but called for assessment of both interventions in low-resource settings. This study aimed to test both interventions in low-income and middle-income countries.Methods FALCON was a 2 × 2 factorial, randomised controlled trial stratified by whether surgery was cleancontaminated, or contaminated or dirty, including patients undergoing abdominal surgery with a skin incision of 5 cm or greater. This trial was undertaken in 54 hospitals in seven countries (

Background Abdominal cocoon (AC) or sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis is an uncommon cause of intestinal obstruction. Surgical intervention is warranted in patients with persistent pain or intestinal obstruction. Methodology A retrospective analysis of patients operated for AC was performed. Clinical presentation, radiological data, postoperative outcomes (Ryles tube (RT) removal, duration of hospital stay, enterocutaneous fistula, requirement for re-exploration and mortality) were retrieved and analyzed. Results Fifteen patients of abdominal cocoon required surgical intervention for various indications. The mean age was 34.46 years (13-60), and 11 (73.3%) were males. Intermittent abdominal pain was present in 14 (93.3%) followed by recurrent subacute intestinal obstruction (SAIO) in 11 (73.3%). Three patients presented with intestinal perforation. Of the 14 patients with preoperative computed tomography, radiological diagnosis was possible in five patients. The mean duration for surgery was 159 min (60-360 min). Membrane encasement was complete in 9/15 and partial in 6/15 patients. Adhesiolysis was done in all patients (complete-10/15 and partial-5/15). Mean duration for RT removal and hospital stay was 4.3 and 12.3 days, respectively. Recurrence of SAIO was observed in three patients, and one patient needed re-exploration for the same. One patient developed postoperative enterocutaneous fistula requiring surgical intervention. Overall mortality in the study was 13.3% (2/15). Four patients had underlying tuberculosis, and the rest were idiopathic. Conclusion Etiology of AC is not known in majority of patients. Persistent pain and recurrent SAIO are the most common indications for surgery. This morbidity associated with surgery can be reduced by meticulous dissection techniques and appropriate peri-operative care.Narender Dhaka: deceased now.

Background: Surgical management is considered one of the effective treatment modality for liver hydatid. However the choice of surgery is debatable. This study aims to compare the outcome of radical surgery (RS) and conservative surgery (CS) in liver hydatid disease.Methods: This is retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained institutional data of surgically treated liver hydatid from January 2012 to January 2019. The basis of diagnosis was typical imaging, confirmatory Hydatid serology and/or Intraoperative details. The clinical presentation, radiological data, operative detail, post-operative outcome, post-operative recurrence data was analysed.Results: Sixty-four patients underwent surgery during the study period and were included. RS was done in 27 (42.2%) patients and CS in 37 (57.8%) patients. The mean age was 35.6 (13-72) years. The mean size of the cyst was 10.3 ± 2.9 cm. The cyst location was peripheral in 81.5% and 56.8% in RS and CS groups respectively. Intraoperative Cyst biliary communication was detected in 48.1% of RS & 35.1% in CS group of patients. The post-operative bile leak was significantly less in RS group (7.4% vs 27.0%, p = 0.047). Postoperative endoscopic stenting for persistent biliary fistula was necessitated in five of CS and only one patient from RS group. None of RS patients had recurrence while 3 patients of CS developed recurrence. Conclusion:Radical surgery reduces post-operative bile leak and prevents recurrence and may be preferable to conservative surgery.

Surgical intervention is warranted in a subset of patients with abdominal tuberculosis and may be required in patients with recurrent intestinal obstruction or pain, intestinal perforation, or gastrointestinal bleeding.