Aims: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a relatively young technique used during complex electrophysiology proce-dures, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of ICE modifies the radia-tion exposure at the beginning of the learning curve in AF ablation. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 52 patients, in which catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF was performed, were included. For 26 patients we used ICE guidance together with fluoroscopy, whereas for the remaining 26 patients we used fluoroscopy alone, all supported by electroanatomical mapping. We compared total procedure time and radiation exposure, including fluoroscopy dose and time between the two groups and along the learning curve. Results: Most of the patients included were suffering from paroxysmal AF (40, 76%), pulmonary vein isolation being performed in all patients, without secondary ablation sites. The use of ICE was associated with a lower fluoroscopy dose (11839.60±6100.6 vs. 16260.43±8264.5 mGy, p=0.041) and time (28.00±12.5 vs. 42.93±12.7 minutes, p=0.001), whereas the mean procedure time was similar between the two groups (181.54±50.3 vs 197.31±49.8 minutes, p=0.348). Radiation exposure was lower in the last 9 months compared to the first 9 months of the study (p<0.01), decreasing gradually along the learning curve. Conclusions: The use of ICE lowers radiation exposure in AF catheter ablation from the beginning of the learning curve, without any difference in terms of acute safety or efficacy. Aware-ness towards closest to zero radiation exposure during electrophysiology procedures should increase in order to achieve better protection for both patient and medical staff.
Heart failure is currently a real public health problem due to the extremely high morbidity and mortality of this disease. In this context, cardiovascular prevention measures should be implemented as early as possible. In addition to classic prevention measures, a number of extremely important specific recommendations should be considered: informing patients about their underlying disease, identifying the cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular factors that have led to cardiac decompensation, reducing daily salt consumption, monitoring body weight, forbidding smoking and recreational substances, conducting a regular exercise program under supervision, and increasing adherence to treatment.
Background: Microvascular angina is a common clinical entity, with about a three-fold higher frequency in women. The pathogenesis of microvascular angina has not been much studied, but inflammation and endothelial dysfunction have been incriminated as the main mechanisms of this disease. Methoss: Our purpose was to analyze whether certain inflammatory markers, i.e., interleukin 6 (IL-6) and endothelin 1 (ET-1), can play a role in the diagnosis of microvascular angina in women. Results: Ninety women with ischemic heart disease were divided into two groups, based on their affliction with either microvascular or macrovascular disease. In general, the levels of IL6 and ET1 were similar between the two groups. Analyzing these marker levels according to the number of coronary lesions, we obtained an increased IL6 value that was similar for patients with microvascular angina, one-vessel, and two-vessel coronary disease, but significantly lower than in women with three-vessel coronary lesions. Also, in microvascular angina, IL6 level was correlated with the NYHA IV functional class. Unexpectedly, the level of ET1 was correlated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Conclusions: In women with an increased suspicion of microvascular angina, in whom microvascular dysfunction cannot be tested invasively, IL-6 level, unlike the ET-1 level, might be considered a diagnostic marker of this disease.
Rationale: Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) is defined as systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle resulting from prolonged elevated heart rates, completely reversible upon control of the arrhythmia. Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) is one of the most frequent causes of TIC. In its incessant form, it is unlikely to be controlled by pharmacological treatment, catheter ablation being the principal therapeutic option. The coexistence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with AVRT may cause difficulties in the early diagnosis and management of tachycardia because of the wide complex morphology, making it harder to localize the accessory pathway (AP). Patient concerns: A 60-year-old woman, presented incessant episodes of palpitations and shortness of breath due to a LBBB tachycardia leading to hemodynamic instability. Diagnosis: The patient had a wide QRS tachycardia, with LBBB morphology and a heart rate of 160/minute. Echocardiography showed global hypokinesia with 25% left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Considering the patient's clinical picture, TIC was suspected. Interventions: The electrophysiological study revealed a left lateral accessory pathway. Catheter ablation was successfully performed at the level of the lateral mitral ring. Outcomes: One week after the ablation the patient had no signs of heart failure and the LVEF normalized to 55%. During 6-months follow-up the patient presented no more episodes of tachycardia or heart failure and the LVEF remained normal. Lessons: AVRT is rarely associated with intrinsic LBBB, being a potential cause of TIC. In these patients, it is unlikely to control the arrhythmia pharmacologically, catheter ablation being the best therapeutic option. The variation of QRS complex duration between LBBB pattern in SR and AVRT could be useful for early diagnosis of an ipsilateral AP on surface ECG.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.