Previous studies of the influence of hydrochory on plant dispersal have focused on relationships with existing vegetation patterns or litter deposits. River sediment deposition studies have assessed sediment accretion rates, particle size and quality. The link between seed and sediment transport and deposition has been overlooked and never quantified.This paper presents observations of over-winter viable seed and sediment deposition on three river margin sites along the River Dove, England. At these sites, 105 paired artificial turf mats were installed on the river bank top, face and toe from October 1999 to March 2000 to collect river-deposited material. From each pair, one mat was used to determine the dry weight; median particle size; percentage sand, silt, clay and organic content of deposited sediment. The other was used in germination trials to determine the number and species of deposited viable seeds. Topographic surveys and water level measurements supported the estimation of the hydrological characteristics of each mat location.Few seeds and little sediment were found on mats not inundated by river water. For these inundated, sediment characteristics varied primarily with elevation (relative to local mean river water level during the study period), with less marked between-site contrasts. The species composition of viable seeds also varied with elevation. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) revealed associations between river/wetland-related seed species and the bank toe samples. Regression analysis revealed significant relationships between seed number, sediment properties and mat elevation. Redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed associations between the species and abundance of viable seeds and elevation, sediment weight and organic matter content. These analyses suggest that sediment and seed deposition by rivers are closely related processes.The implications of these results for seed remobilization and dispersal and hydrochory within riparian zones are discussed, as are the implications of changes in sediment/seed delivery mechanisms, river flow regimes, and the hydraulic properties of river margins for seeds, sediments and riparian vegetation patterns.
After a brief description of the evolution of seed bank research, this review highlights the importance of the seed bank in understanding the character and dynamics of river margins. Through a discussion of published research on wetlands in general, the lack of research focused on riparian systems is highlighted. This is followed by an evaluation of current knowledge concerning the nature and dynamics of riparian seed banks and the factors that control the erosion, transport and deposition of riparian seeds. The paper concludes by (i) indicating the complexity of the interactions that control the riparian seed bank and that require understanding if the consequences of alterations in river flow regime and riparian management are to be fully understood and (ii) identifying some major research gaps relating to interactions between fluvial processes and riparian seed banks.
Riffle-pool sequences are the dominant bedforms in gravel and mixed bedded channels of intermediate slope. Their fundamental importance in determining the mesoscale habitat environment is demonstrated in their widespread recreation in channel restoration and rehabilitation schemes. This paper explores the hydraulic functioning of riffle-pool bedforms, particularly the variations in the hydraulic performance of different bed oscillation morphologies. It addresses the need for a quantitative means of classifying flow behaviour that can be applied in functional ecohydraulic river rehabilitation designs.Information from reaches on two physically contrasting UK rivers with well marked riffle-pool topography are used to illustrate the approach. The reaches are mapped to obtain a detailed channel morphology. Surveys describing the streamwise depthaveraged velocities at three flow stages are interpolated to a common regular grid, grouped using cluster analysis, and then the validity of each cluster as a distinct hydraulic patch class is assessed statistically using analysis of variance. The spatial pattern of the hydraulic patch classes is then overlain on the bed topography to link the patches to the bed morphology. The procedure groups locations along the channel which display similar suites of velocity values at different flow stages and thus differentiates between areas in the channel within which the hydraulic habitat is spatially relatively invariant from those where abrupt changes occur. It also allows the quantitative description of different hydraulic patch classes. Overlay of the hydraulic patch class boundaries on channel reach topography provides a simple but innovative method of exploring and defining the spatial hydraulic habitat implications of riffle-pools of different topographic forms.
Trees fall naturally into rivers generating flow heterogeneity, inducing geomorphological features, and creating habitats for biota. Wood is increasingly used in restoration projects and the potential of wood acting as leaky barriers to deliver natural flood management by 'slowing the flow' is recognised. However, wood in rivers can pose a risk to infrastructure and locally increase flood hazards. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-to-date summary of the benefits and risks associated with using wood to promote geomorphological processes to restore and manage rivers. This summary was developed through a workshop that brought together academics, river managers, restoration practitioners and consultants in the UK to share science and best practice on wood in rivers. A consensus was developed on four key issues: (i) hydrogeomorphological effects, (ii) current use in restoration and management, (iii) uncertainties and risks and (iv) tools and guidance required to inform process-based restoration and management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.