No abstract

The application of the SBT method allowed to verify the homology among Legionella strains from water samples and the surrounding air. The results showed that the same Lpn strains were present in the air and water samples, and a new Legionella strain was identified.

No abstract

Healthcare facilities (HF) represent an at-risk environment for legionellosis transmission occurring after inhalation of contaminated aerosols. In general, the control of water is preferred to that of air because, to date, there are no standardized sampling protocols. Legionella air contamination was investigated in the bathrooms of 11 HF by active sampling (Surface Air System and Coriolis®μ) and passive sampling using settling plates. During the 8-hour sampling, hot tap water was sampled three times. All air samples were evaluated using culture-based methods, whereas liquid samples collected using the Coriolis®μ were also analyzed by real-time PCR. Legionella presence in the air and water was then compared by sequence-based typing (SBT) methods. Air contamination was found in four HF (36.4%) by at least one of the culturable methods. The culturable investigation by Coriolis®μ did not yield Legionella in any enrolled HF. However, molecular investigation using Coriolis®μ resulted in eight HF testing positive for Legionella in the air. Comparison of Legionella air and water contamination indicated that Legionella water concentration could be predictive of its presence in the air. Furthermore, a molecular study of 12 L. pneumophila strains confirmed a match between the Legionella strains from air and water samples by SBT for three out of four HF that tested positive for Legionella by at least one of the culturable methods. Overall, our study shows that Legionella air detection cannot replace water sampling because the absence of microorganisms from the air does not necessarily represent their absence from water; nevertheless, air sampling may provide useful information for risk assessment. The liquid impingement technique appears to have the greatest capacity for collecting airborne Legionella if combined with molecular investigations.

A comparative assessment of conventional culture and nucleic acid techniques in the detection of Legionella pneumophila in seeded tap water samples was performed, using bacterial concentrations ranging from 994 to 0·015 cfu ml−1. Different filtration and centrifugation protocols were evaluated. The results permitted the development of a tentative algorithm for the detection of legionellae in tap water. Samples should first be analysed using PCR methods. In the event of quantitative data and bacterial strains for epidemiologic typing being required, the same sample, or a greater volume of the sample, if positive with PCR, can be re‐tested by filtration through polycarbonate membranes followed by plating a homogenate of the filter. If samples are found to be negative with PCR, they can be re‐analysed in greater volumes by filtration through polycarbonate membranes followed by direct placing of the filter on culture media, to allow detection of very low numbers of bacteria. This protocol should be validated in the field before it can be routinely implemented.