Background Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate approved in the USA for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. DRF is converted to monomethyl fumarate, the pharmacologically active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DRF 462 mg and DMF 240 mg produce bioequivalent exposure of monomethyl fumarate and are therefore expected to have similar efficacy/safety profiles; the distinct chemical structure of DRF may contribute to its tolerability profile. Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF and DMF over 5 weeks in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Methods EVOLVE-MS-2 was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head, 5-week study evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerability of DRF 462 mg vs DMF 240 mg, administered twice daily in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, using two self-administered gastrointestinal symptom scales: Individual Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (IGISIS) and Global Gastrointestinal Symptom and Impact Scale (GGISIS). The primary endpoint was the number of days with an IGISIS intensity score ≥ 2 relative to exposure. Other endpoints included the degree of gastrointestinal symptom severity measured by IGISIS/GGISIS and assessment of safety/tolerability. Results DRF-treated patients experienced a statistically significant reduction (46%) in the number of days with an IGISIS symptom intensity score ≥ 2 compared with DMF-treated patients (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.54 [0.39-0.75]; p = 0.0003). Lower rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain) were observed with DRF than DMF (34.8% vs 49.0%). Fewer patients discontinued DRF than DMF because of adverse events (1.6% vs 5.6%) and gastrointestinal adverse events (0.8% vs 4.8%). Conclusions DRF demonstrated an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with DMF, with less severe gastrointestinal events and fewer days of self-assessed gastrointestinal symptoms, fewer gastrointestinal adverse events, and lower discontinuation rates because of gastrointestinal adverse events. Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03093324). Maria Lopez-Bresnahan and David Rezendes: Employees of Alkermes Inc. during the time the research and analyses were conducted.

Background: Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a novel oral fumarate for patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). DRF and the approved drug dimethyl fumarate yield bioequivalent exposure to the active metabolite monomethyl fumarate; thus, efficacy/safety profiles are expected to be similar. However, DRF’s distinct chemical structure may result in a differentiated gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability profile. Objective: To report interim safety/efficacy findings from patients in the ongoing EVOLVE-MS-1 study. Methods: EVOLVE-MS-1 is an ongoing, open-label, 96-week, phase 3 study assessing DRF safety, tolerability, and efficacy in RRMS patients. Primary endpoint is safety and tolerability; efficacy endpoints are exploratory. Results: As of March 2018, 696 patients were enrolled; median exposure was 59.9 (range: 0.1–98.9) weeks. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 84.6% (589/696) of patients; the majority were mild (31.2%; 217/696) or moderate (46.8%; 326/696) in severity. Overall treatment discontinuation was 14.9%; 6.3% due to AEs and <1% due to GI AEs. At Week 48, mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was significantly reduced from baseline (77%; p < 0.0001) and adjusted annualized relapse rate was low (0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.13–0.20). Conclusion: Interim data from EVOLVE-MS-1 suggest DRF is a well-tolerated treatment with a favorable safety/efficacy profile for patients with RRMS.

Objective: Evaluate efficacy and safety of a 2-month formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) with 1-day initiation during hospitalization for acute exacerbation of schizophrenia followed by transition to outpatient care. Methods: The phase 3b double-blind Aripiprazole Lauroxil and Paliperidone palmitate: INitiation Effectiveness (ALPINE) study was conducted from November 2017 to March 2019. Adults with acute schizophrenia according to DSM-5 criteria were randomized (1:1) to AL (AL NanoCrystal Dispersion + oral aripiprazole 30 mg, day 1; AL 1,064 mg, day 8 and every 8 weeks [q8wk]) or paliperidone palmitate (PP 234 mg, day 1; PP 156 mg, day 8 and then q4wk) for 25 weeks. Patients remained hospitalized ≥ 2 weeks after randomization per protocol. Primary endpoint was within-group change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (PANSS T) from baseline to week 4. Secondary analyses included within-and between-group changes from baseline at various time points. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory data were monitored. Results: A total of 200 patients were randomized (AL, n = 99; PP, n = 101); 56.6% and 42.6%, respectively, completed the study. For AL, the mean baseline PANSS T was 94.1; scores were significantly reduced from baseline at week 4 (−17.4; P < .001) and were also reduced at weeks 9 (−19.8) and 25 (−23.3). With PP, PANSS T also improved significantly from baseline (94.6) at week 4 (−20.1; P < .001) and also improved at weeks 9 (−22.5) and 25 (−21.7). The 3 most common AEs over 25 weeks in the AL group were injection site pain (17.2%), increased weight (9.1%), and akathisia (9.1%). The same AEs were the most common in the PP group (injection site pain [24.8%], increased weight [16.8%], and akathisia [10.9%]). Conclusions: AL and PP were efficacious and well-tolerated for initiating treatment of schizophrenia in the hospital and continuing outpatient treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03345979

2513 Background: Nemvaleukin alfa (nemvaleukin, ALKS 4230) is a novel, engineered cytokine that selectively binds the intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor complex to preferentially activate CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells with minimal expansion of regulatory T cells, designed to leverage antitumor effects of the IL-2 pathwaywhile mitigating potential toxicity that would limit use. Methods: ARTISTRY-1 (NCT02799095) is a phase 1/2 study. Parts A (dose escalation 0.1-10 µg/kg) and B (6 µg/kg [recommended phase 2 dose]) are monotherapy; pts receive intravenous nemvaleukin for 5 days every 14 or 21 days. In Part C, pts receive nemvaleukin (3 or 6 µg/kg) every 21 days in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg on day 1). We present safety and antitumor activity (RECIST v1.1, iRECIST) data as of 12/02/2020. Results: In Part A, 39 pts received nemvaleukin. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Part B enrolled immune checkpoint inhibitor–pretreated pts into melanoma or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cohorts. 18 pts with melanoma enrolled; 10 were evaluable, 2 (both with metastatic mucosal melanoma) achieved a partial response (PR; 1 unconfirmed). 24 pts with RCC enrolled; 1 of 16 evaluable pts achieved a PR (awaiting confirmation). 12 pts in each cohort continue on study. In Parts A and B, treatment-related adverse events in ≥40% included chills (74.4% and 52.4%, respectively) and pyrexia (74.4% and 47.6%, respectively). In Part C (83 evaluable pts), 12 objective responses (OR) were observed; an additional 5 pts had stable disease (SD) >6 months (1 pt with breast cancer, 2 with ovarian cancer, and 2 with non-small-cell lung cancer). Nemvaleukin did not demonstrate any additive toxicity to that already established with pembrolizumab alone. OR data are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Nemvaleukin was generally well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Pharmacodynamic studies to identify biomarkers are ongoing. Future research of monotherapy and combination therapy with nemvaleukin is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02799095. [Table: see text]

No abstract