Background: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E), more commonly known as ‘cough assist therapy', is a method which produces inspiratory and expiratory assistance to improve cough performances. However, other alternatives or combinations are possible. Objective: The objective was to compare the effects of mechanical insufflation combined with manually assisted coughing (MAC), insufflation-exsufflation alone and insufflation-exsufflation combined with MAC in neuromuscular patients requiring cough assistance. Methods: Eighteen neuromuscular patients with severe respiratory muscle dysfunction and peak cough flow (PCF) lower than 3 liters/s or maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) lower than +45 cm H₂O were studied. Patients were studied under three cough-assisted conditions, which were used in random order: insufflation by intermittent positive-pressure breathing (IPPB) combined with MAC, MI-E and MI-E + MAC. Results: Overall, PCF was higher with IPPB + MAC than with MI-E + MAC or MI-E alone. Among the 12 patients who had higher PCF values with IPPB + MAC than with the two other techniques, 9 exhibited mask pressure swings during MI-E exsufflation, with a transient positive-pressure value due to the expiratory flow produced by the combined patient cough effort and MAC. Each of these 9 patients had higher PCF values (>5 liters/s) than did the other 9 patients when using IPPB + MAC. Conclusion: Our results indicate that adding the MI-E device to MAC is unhelpful in patients whose PCF with an insufflation technique and MAC exceeds 5 liters/s. This is because the expiratory flow produced by the patient's effort and MAC transitorily exceeds the vacuum capacity of the MI-E device, which therefore becomes a transient load against the PCF.

We found large differences in hypoventilation prevalence according to the used definition. This has practical consequences, as HMV indication relies upon hypoventilation detection. We believe that capno-oximetry should be included in the diagnostic tools used to detect hypoventilation but this requires an update of consensus guidelines to agree upon the best definition.

BACKGROUND The pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationship between whole blood δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and driving risk is poorly understood. METHODS Fifteen chronic cannabis consumers (1–2 joints/day; CC) and 15 occasional cannabis consumers (1–2 joints/week; OC) of 18 to 34 years of age were included. A pharmacokinetic study was conducted with 12 blood samplings over a 24-h period before and after controlled random inhalation of placebo or 10 mg or 30 mg of THC. THC and metabolites were quantified using LC-MS/MS. Effects on reaction time by psychomotor vigilance tests and driving performance through a York driving simulator were evaluated 7 times. A pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using R software. RESULTS Whole blood peak THC was 2 times higher in CC than in OC for a same dose and occurred 5 min after the end of consumption. THC remained detectable only in CC after 24 h. Despite standardized consumption, CC consumed more available THC from each cigarette regardless of dose. Maximal effect for reaction time was dose- and group-dependent and only group-dependent for driving performance, both being decreased and more marked in OC than in CC. These effects were maximal around 5 h after administration, and the duration was longer in OC than in CC. A significant pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationship was observed only between Tmax for blood THC and the duration effect on mean reciprocal reaction time. CONCLUSIONS Inhalation from cannabis joints leads to a rapid increase in blood THC with a delayed decrease in vigilance and driving performance, more pronounced and lasting longer in OC than in CC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02061020