; on behalf of the American Thoracic Society Assembly on Sleep and Respiratory Neurobiology THIS OFFICIAL CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY WAS APPROVED MAY 2019 Background: The purpose of this guideline is to optimize evaluation and management of patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS). Methods: A multidisciplinary panel identified and prioritized five clinical questions. The panel performed systematic reviews of available studies (up to July 2018) and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. All panel members discussed and approved the recommendations. Recommendations: After considering the overall very low quality of the evidence, the panel made five conditional recommendations. We suggest that: 1) clinicians use a serum bicarbonate level ,27 mmol/L to exclude the diagnosis of OHS in obese patients with sleepdisordered breathing when suspicion for OHS is not very high (,20%) but to measure arterial blood gases in patients strongly suspected of having OHS, 2) stable ambulatory patients with OHS receive positive airway pressure (PAP), 3) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) rather than noninvasive ventilation be offered as the first-line treatment to stable ambulatory patients with OHS and coexistent severe obstructive sleep apnea, 4) patients hospitalized with respiratory failure and suspected of having OHS be discharged with noninvasive ventilation until they undergo outpatient diagnostic procedures and PAP titration in the sleep laboratory (ideally within 2-3 mo), and 5) patients with OHS use weight-loss interventions that produce sustained weight loss of 25% to 30% of body weight to achieve resolution of OHS (which is more likely to be obtained with bariatric surgery). Conclusions: Clinicians may use these recommendations, on the basis of the best available evidence, to guide management and improve outcomes among patients with OHS.

Background : Patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 infection are at risk for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). It is unknown whether certain characteristics of cardiac arrest care and outcomes of IHCAs during the COVID-19 pandemic differed compared to a pre-COVID-19 period. Methods : All patients who experienced an IHCA at our hospital from March 1st through May 15th 2020, during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and those who had an IHCA from January 1st 2019 to December 31st 2019 were identified. All patient data was extracted from our hospital's Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R) registry, a prospective hospital-based archive of IHCA data. Baseline characteristics of patients, interventions and overall outcomes of IHCAs during the COVID-19 pandemic were compared to IHCAs in 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results : There were 125 IHCAs during a 2.5-month period at our hospital during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 117 IHCAs in all of 2019. IHCAs during the COVID-19 pandemic occurred more often on general medicine wards than in intensive care units (46% vs 33%; 19% vs 60% in 2019, p<0.001), were overall shorter in duration (median time of 11 min (8.5-26.5) vs 15 min (7.0-20.0), p=0.001), led to fewer endotracheal intubations (52% vs 85%, p<0.001) and had overall worse survival rates (3% vs 13%, p=0.007) compared to IHCAs prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions : Patients who experienced an IHCA during the COVID-19 pandemic had overall worse survival compared to those who had an IHCA prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings highlight important differences between these two time periods. Further study is needed on cardiac arrest care in patients with COVID-19.

Background: The fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO ) test is a point-of-care test that is used in the assessment of asthma.Objective: To provide evidence-based clinical guidance on whether FE NO testing is indicated to optimize asthma treatment in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered.Methods: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to form a consensus document regarding a single question relevant to the use of FE NO . The question was selected from three potential questions based on the greatest perceived impact on clinical practice and the unmet need for evidencebased answers related to this question. The panel performed systematic reviews of published randomized controlled trials between 2004 and 2019 and followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision framework to develop recommendations. All panel members evaluated and approved the recommendations.Main Results: After considering the overall low quality of the evidence, the panel made a conditional recommendation for FE NO -based care. In patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered, we suggest that FE NO is beneficial and should be used in addition to usual care. This judgment is based on a balance of effects that probably favors the intervention; the moderate costs and availability of resources, which probably favors the intervention; and the perceived acceptability and feasibility of the intervention in daily practice.Conclusions: Clinicians should consider this recommendation to measure FE NO in patients with asthma in whom treatment is being considered based on current best available evidence.

Extrathoracic disease was more prevalent in WTC-related sarcoidosis than reported for patients with sarcoidosis without WTC exposure or for other exposure-related granulomatous diseases (beryllium disease and hypersensitivity pneumonitis). Cardiac involvement would have been missed if evaluation stopped after ECG, 48-h recordings, and echocardiogram. Our results also support the need for advanced cardiac screening in asymptomatic patients with strenuous, stressful, public safety occupations, given the potential fatality of a missed diagnosis.