Clinical assessments of photodamage are based upon a subjective evaluation of characteristic features such as wrinkling and pigmentary change, and are influenced by inter-observer differences in grading criteria. In an effort to standardize the grading of photodamage severity, we have developed a six-point photographic scale in which each of the six grades of overall photodamage severity is depicted by three photographs. The use of three photographs to portray each grade illustrates the diversity and range of manifestations within each grade. This photographic scale was tested by two groups of dermatologists, who used it on two occasions to grade the overall photodamage severity of a single group of female Caucasian subjects. Results indicate high inter-observer agreement, with chance-corrected agreement ranging from 0.44 to 0.63 and from 0.54 to 0.76 on the first and second occasions, respectively. Intra-observer repeatability was high, with chance-corrected agreement ranging from 0.56 to 0.78. Inter- and intra-observer differences were within one category in nearly all cases. Similar grades were assigned by dermatologists with and without experience in treating photodamaged patients. We conclude that application of this scale results in consistent and reproducible clinical evaluations of overall photodamage severity in Caucasian subjects. The scale may be useful in categorizing subjects for epidemiological studies, or in selecting patients for clinical trials.

No abstract

No abstract

Rare squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cases associated with voriconazole therapy have been reported, but this risk may not receive enough consideration from clinicians. We describe four patients presenting with multiple SCC while receiving prolonged (two to three years) voriconazole therapy. Three patients had underwent lung transplantation. SCC were preceded by photosensitization lesions, and predominated in photoexposed area, particularly the face. Therapy associated surgery, chemotherapy in one case, and voriconazole discontinuation; replacement by posaconazole or itraconazole did not trigger other photosensitive lesions. Once voriconazole withdrawn, preneoplastic lesions regressed. In conclusion, prolonged voriconazole therapy may enhance the risk of photoinduced SCC in immunocompromised patients, and skin monitoring is mandatory.