Interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and plasma data are compared with ground-based geomagnetic Dst and AE indices to determine the causes of magnetic storms, substorms, and quiet during the descending phase of the solar cycle. In this paper we focus primarily on 1974 when the AE index is anomalously high (AE = 283 nT). This year is characterized by the presence of two long-lasting corotating streams associated with coronal holes. The corotating streams interact with the upstream low-velocity (300-350 km s-1), high-density heliospheric current sheet (HCS) plasma sheet, which leads to field compression and ~ 15-to 25-nT hourly average values. Although the B z component in this corotating interaction region (CIR) is often < -10 nT, typically the field directionality is highly variable, and large southward components have durations less than 3 hours. Thus the corotating stream/HCS plasma sheet interaction region can cause recurring moderate (-100 nT < Dst < -50 nT) to weak (-50 nT < Dst < -25 nT) storms, and sometimes no significant ring current activity at all (Dst > -25 nT). Storms of major (Dst < -100 nT) intensities were not associated with CIRs. Solar wind energy is transferred to the magnetosphere via magnetic reconnection during the weak and moderate storms. Because the B z component in the interaction region is typically highly fluctuating, the corresponding storm main phase profile is highly irregular. Reverse shocks are sometimes present at the sunward edge of the CIR. Because these events cause sharp decreases in field magnitude, they can be responsible for storm recovery phase onsets. The initial phases of these corotating stream-related storms are caused by the increased ram pressure associated with the HCS plasma sheet and the further density enhancement from the stream-stream compression. Although the solar wind speed is generally low in this region of space, the densities can be well over an order of magnitude higher than the average value, leading to significant positive Dst values. Since there are typically no forward shocks at 1 AU associated with the stream-stream interactions, the initial phases have gradual onsets. The most dramatic geomagnetic response to the corotating streams are chains of consecutive substorms caused by the southward components of large-amplitude Alfvtn waves within the body of the corotating streams. This auroral activity has been previously named high-intensity long-duration continuous AE activity (HILDCAAs). The substorm activity is generally most intense near the peak speed of the stream where the Alfvtn wave amplitudes are greatest, and it decreases with decreasing wave amplitudes and stream speed. Each of the 27-day recurring HILDCAA events can last 10 days or more, and the presence of two events per solar rotation is the cause of the exceptionally high AE average for 1974 (higher than 1979). HILDCAAs often occur during the recovery phase of magnetic storms, and the fresh (and sporadic) injection of substorm energy leads to unusually long storm recovery phases as noted...

The Juno microwave radiometer measured the thermal emission from Jupiter's atmosphere from the cloud tops at about 1 bar to as deep as a hundred bars of pressure during its first flyby over Jupiter (PJ1). The nadir brightness temperatures show that the Equatorial Zone is likely to be an ideal adiabat, which allows a determination of the deep ammonia abundance in the range 362−33+33 ppm. The combination of Markov chain Monte Carlo method and Tikhonov regularization is studied to invert Jupiter's global ammonia distribution assuming a prescribed temperature profile. The result shows (1) that ammonia is depleted globally down to 50–60 bars except within a few degrees of the equator, (2) the North Equatorial Belt is more depleted in ammonia than elsewhere, and (3) the ammonia concentration shows a slight inversion starting from about 7 bars to 2 bars. These results are robust regardless of the choice of water abundance.

Oxygen is the most common element after hydrogen and helium in Jupiter's atmosphere, and may have been the primary condensable (as water ice) in the protoplanetary disk. Prior to the Juno mission, in situ measurements of Jupiter's water abundance were obtained from the Galileo Probe, which dropped into a meteorologically anomalous site. The findings of the Galileo Probe were inconclusive because the concentration of water was still increasing when the probe died. Here, we initially report on the water abundance in the equatorial region, from 0 to 4 degrees north latitude, based on 1.25 to 22 GHz data from Juno Microwave radiometer probing approximately 0.7 to 30 bars pressure. Because Juno discovered the deep atmosphere to be surprisingly variable as a function of latitude, it remains to confirm whether the equatorial abundance represents Jupiter's global water abundance. The water abundance at the equatorial region is inferred to be. !. %. × ppm, or. !. %. times the protosolar oxygen elemental ratio to H (1 uncertainties). If reflective of the global water abundance, the result suggests that the planetesimals formed Jupiter are unlikely to be water-rich clathrate hydrates. From thermodynamic calculations 1 , three types of cloud layers in the Jovian atmosphere are thought to exist: an ammonia ice cloud, an ammonium hydrosulfide ice cloud 2,3 , and a water ice and droplet cloud, formed approximately at 0.7 bars, 2.2 bars, and 5 bars, respectively, assuming solar abundances. The locations of these clouds may vary due to the local abundance, meteorology and specific model parameters. Condensation and evaporation of water contribute to weather on giant planets because water is the most abundant species apart from hydrogen and helium and the latent heat flux in convective storms is comparable to the solar and internal heat fluxes 4,5. Consequently, the thermal state of the atmosphere is affected by the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. Prior to the Juno mission, in situ measurements of Jupiter's atmospheric composition below the clouds were obtained from the Galileo Probe 6 , which dropped into a meteorologically anomalous site (6.57° N planetocentric latitude , 4.46° W longitude) 7 , known as a 5 "hot spot" near the boundary between the visibly-bright Equatorial Zone (EZ) and the dark North Equatorial Belt (NEB) 8. The findings of the Galileo Probe were baffling, for they showed that the levels where ammonia and hydrogen sulfide become uniformly

[1] Global signatures of the aurora caused by interplanetary shocks/pressure pulses have been studied in recent years using ultraviolet imager data from polar orbiting spacecraft. The signatures include the occurrence of the aurora first near local noon and then propagation antisunward along the auroral oval at very high speeds. To better understand the mechanisms of particle precipitation, in this paper we study shock auroras using nearEarth observations of the FAST and DMSP satellites. We have studied the events that occurred during 1996-2000 where FAST and/or DMSP crossed the dawnside or duskside auroral zone within 10 min after shocks/pressure pulses arrived at the nose of the magnetopause. It is found that the electron precipitation increased significantly above the dawnside and duskside auroral oval zone after the shock/pressure pulse arrivals. The precipitation structure is low-energy electrons (<$1 keV) at higher latitudes ($75°-83°I LAT within 0600-0900 MLT) and high-energy electrons ($1-10 keV) at lower latitudes ($65°-79°ILAT) of the auroral zone. There are a few degrees (1°-4°ILAT) of overlap between these two categories of precipitated electrons. The precipitation of low-energy electrons was along highly structured field-aligned currents. The precipitation of the high-energy electrons was highly isotropic filling the loss cone. Possible mechanisms of field-aligned current generation are some dynamic processes occurring on the dayside magnetopause, such as magnetic shearing, magnetopause perturbation, magnetic reconnection, and Alfvén wave generation. Adiabatic compression might have caused the high-energy electron precipitation. On the basis of observations of FAST and DMSP, shock auroras are speculated to be diffuse auroras at the lower latitudes of the dayside auroral oval and discrete auroras on the poleward boundary of the oval with a few latitude degree overlap of the two types of auroras.

[1] Solar wind protons detected within Magnetic Holes (MHs) and Magnetic Decreases (MDs) are found to be preferentially heated perpendicular toB 0 . The MHs/MDs are associated with the phase-steepened edges of nonlinear Alfvén waves. The proton anisotropies can lead to the proton cyclotron and mirror mode plasma instabilities. We examine the Ponderomotive Force (PF), a phenomenon due to wave pressure gradients, and show that for this plasma regime and for phase-steepened Alfvén waves, the PF proton acceleration/energization will primarily be orthogonal to B 0 . It is suggested that accelerated ions create the MHs/MDs by a diamagnetic effect.