Volume 46, no. 1, p. 150-156, 2008. In our recent report describing the in vitro susceptibility of 5,346 Candida spp. to the echinocandins, we noted the excellent activity of the echinocandins and the lack of evidence of emerging echinocandin resistance over 6 years of global surveillance. We also described 12 (out of a total of 2,869) isolates of Candida albicans that demonstrated a high-anidulafungin-MIC phenotype, which we defined as an anidulafungin MIC of 2 g/ml. We noted that these isolates, while still susceptible according to the recently approved Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoint of Յ2 g/ml (minutes of the June 2007 meeting of the CLSI Antifungal Subcommittee), were nonetheless of interest because their echinocandin MICs were distinctly higher than the normal wild-type distribution of echinocandin MICs for C. albicans (page 152, column 2, lines 1-18).While pulling these 12 isolates from our bank for further evaluation, we noted that none of them demonstrated the characteristic green color of C. albicans on CHROMagar Candida ( Further evaluation of these isolates (with the assistance of David Pincus and Nancy Moss in the research and development group at bioMerieux, Inc.) revealed that all demonstrated the same atypical pattern for the Vitek YBC database (for C. parapsilosis), specifically for three reactions, those involving alpha methyl-D-glucoside (AMG), melezitose (MLZ), and xylitol (XLT). All 12 isolates were AMG negative, MLZ negative, and XLT positive in our hands. Based upon these three atypical reactions, the YBC algorithm generated C. albicans as the best match for each isolate. These findings were confirmed by sending the isolates to bioMerieux, Inc., for testing, which revealed highly variable AMG statuses (with only 3 of the 12 isolates being strongly negative), negative MLZ results for 11 of the 12 isolates, and positive XLT results for all 12 isolates. When tested with the API 20-C system, 11 of the 12 isolates were correctly identified as C. parapsilosis, and when tested on the Vitek 2 YST card, all 12 were correctly identified, with 3 of the 12 giving a "low discrimination" call with C. famata.We regret that we did not detect this species identification error prior to publication. At the time of the initial receipt and characterization of the isolates, all were identified as C. albicans based upon the Vitek YBC result. We are in the process of systematically assessing the error rate of our Vitek YBC system for identification of C. parapsilosis, in particular the rare misidentification of C. parapsilosis as C. albicans. Preliminary findings suggest that this is an uncommon event, occurring for fewer than 2% of all C. parapsilosis isolates tested on the YBC (data not shown). In each case of misidentification we have detected thus far, the CHROMagar appearance of the organism is not consistent with that of C. albicans. We no longer accept a Vitek YBC result of C. albicans for an isolate without a characteristic CHROMagar appearance. In addition, we confirm the id...