Though very rare, RET rearrangements define a new subtype of mCRC that shows poor prognosis with conventional treatments and is therefore worth of a specific management.
Objective: Melanoma is major medical challenge and being able to monitor treatment response is critical. This study aimed to use molecular profiling of Asian patients with advanced melanoma who were receiving treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) to identify novel biomarkers of tumor response. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using tumor specimens collected from 178 Asian patients with metastatic melanoma receiving CPIs. The NGS data and clinical-pathological factors were analyzed for potential genetic biomarkers of tumor response to CPI treatment. Results: The most common melanoma subtype was acral melanoma (40%), followed by cutaneous melanoma (32%), mucosal melanoma (26%), and others (2%). For calculation of treatment efficacy, 164 of the patients could be evaluated. The overall response rate was 45.7%, of which 41 cases exhibited complete responses (25.0%) and 34 showed partial responses (20.7%). There were no significant differences in tumor responses based on melanoma subtype (P ¼ 0.295). Genetically, NRAS mutations, TP53 mutations, and NF2 deletions were significantly associated with resistance to CPIs (P < 0.05). In contrast, MYC and RPS6KB1 amplifications were associated with responsiveness to CPIs (P < 0.05). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with CPIs was 5.9 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.05 months). Univariate analysis identified TP53 and BRAF mutations, NF2 deletions, and BIRC2 amplifications as poor prognostic factors for PFS (P < 0.05). Conclusions: This study determined the integrated genomic profiles of Asian patients with metastatic melanoma receiving CPIs and identified candidate biomarkers that reflected treatment outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.