Summary The purpose of this systematic study was to provide an up to date and reliable quantitative summary of the relative benefits of various types of chemotherapy (non-platinum vs platinum, single-agent vs combination and carboplatin vs cisplatin) in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Also, to investigate whether well-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from cisplatin-or carboplatinbased therapy. Meta-analyses were based on updated individual patient data from all available randomized controlled trials (published and unpublished), including 37 trials, 5667 patients and 4664 deaths. The results suggest that platinum-based chemotherapy is better than nonplatinum therapy, show a trend in favour of platinum combinations over single-agent platinum, and suggest that cisplatin and carboplatin are equally effective. There is no good evidence that cisplatin is more or less effective than carboplatin in any particular subgroup of patients.Keywords: meta-analysis; systematic review; randomized controlled trials; advanced ovarian cancer; chemotherapy Health care professionals and patients alike are becoming increasingly aware of the need to make medical decisions on the basis of up-to-date, objective and unbiased research (Chalmers and Haynes, 1994). The most reliable information results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Unfortunately, most RCTs, including those conducted in ovarian cancer, have been too small to demonstrate moderate treatment benefits with reliability, and many results have been inconclusive or contradictory. The Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group (AOCTG) recognized that the best means of synthesizing such randomized evidence is by systematic meta-analysis. In 1988, five meta-analyses of chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer using updated individual patient data were initiated. The first results were published in 1991 (AOCTG, 1991). The AOCTG recognized the importance of updating these results especially for the comparison of carboplatin and cisplatin, in which the data were relatively immature. The comparison of platinum analogues was considered of such clinical importance that further new investigations were initiated to identify whether any particular type of women or tumour would benefit more from either cisplatin-or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODSTrials were eligible for inclusion provided they examined first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer, were properly randomized and made one of the treatment comparisons described below. Trials were identified by bibliographic searches using MEDLINE and CancerLit, by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by consulting trial registers (AOCTG, 1991). Both published and unpublished trials were included and updated data were sought for all randomized patients. All data were checked thoroughly and the final database entries for each trial were verified by the responsible trialist or data centre.All analyses were based on intention to treat. Survival analyses were stratified by trial, and t...

Combined modality treatment in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's disease overall has a significantly inferior long-term survival outcome than CT alone if CT is given over an appropriate number of cycles. The role of RT in this setting is limited to specific indications.

Progressive bone disease in multiple myeloma frequently leads to osteolysis, bone resorption, pathologic fractures, vertebral compression, and hypercalcemia. We conducted a double-blind study in 173 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients of etidronate disodium (EHDP), a diphosphonate compound that reduces bone resorption by inhibiting osteoclastic activity. The patients were randomly assigned to receive oral EHDP 5 mg/kg/d or placebo until death or discontinuation due to intolerance or refusal. The extent of vertebral deformity was measured by a vertebral index as well as height. The frequency of pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia, and bone pain was regularly assessed, as well as size and number of osteolytic lesions. All patients received melphalan and prednisone daily for 4 days every 4 weeks as the primary chemotherapy for their disease. Although the repeated measures analysis showed a significant height loss, there was no difference between treatment arms (P = .98). There was no significant difference in bone pain, episodes of hypercalcemia, or development of pathologic fractures. Patients on EHDP showed less deterioration in their vertebral index, but this difference only approached statistical significance (P = .07). We conclude that EHDP therapy used in this dosage schedule does not have a clinically significant impact in multiple myeloma.

Age is not a significant adverse prognostic variable in SCLC patients with LD. Moderately aggressive chemotherapy may be delivered safely to elderly patients with a good performance status, although modest attenuation of therapy through either dose reduction or omission may occur more frequently in this population.

No abstract