No abstract

Introduction As early breast cancer might relapse even after complete removal of breast and lymphnodes, the disease must persist in secondary sites. The detection of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow (BM) has been described as a surrogate of residual disease. Various trials showed an impaired prognosis of DTC positive early breast cancer (EBC) patients. The PADDY (Pooled Analysis of DTC Detection in Early Breast Cancer) study is a large international pooled analysis that aimed to assess the prognostic impact of DTC detection in patients with EBC. Methods A pre-specified protocol was followed, and centers known to practice BM sampling for DTC detection were contacted for individual patient data. Patients with EBC, with available follow-up data and BM sampling before any anti-cancer treatment were eligible. BM aspirates were collected at the time of primary surgery. DTC were identified by antibody (A45-B/B3, AE1/AE3, 2E11 and E29) staining against cytokeratin. The DTC status was compared to other prognostic factors using the chi-squared test. Univariate log-rank test and multivariate cox regression were used to compare survival of DTC positive versus DTC negative patients. Results Individual data from 10,320 patients (11 centers from Europe and USA) were included with a median follow-up of 91 months. Of all patients, 2,823 (27.4 %) were DTC positive. DTC detection was associated with higher tumor grade, higher T stage, nodal positivity, ER and PR negativity, and HER2 positivity (all p<0.001). In univariate analyses, overall, breast cancer specific, disease-free and distant disease-free survival (OS, BCSS, DFS, DDFS) were significantly shorter in DTC positive patients with p-values of <0.001. Multivariate analyses showed the DTC status to be an independent prognostic marker for OS, BCSS, DFS and DDFS with hazard ratios (HR) and 95%-confidence intervals (CI) of 1.23 (95%-CI: 1.06-1.42, p=0.007), 1.38 (95%-CI: 1.11-1.72, p=0.004), 1.29 (95%-CI: 1.10-1.50, p=0.001) and 1.32 (95%-CI: 1.10-1.58, p=0.003), respectively. Conclusions Detection of DTC in the bone marrow is an independent prognostic marker in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Further studies should investigate the impact of DTC on metastatic cancer progression and their role for clinical decision making. Citation Format: Hartkopf AD, Brucker SY, Taran F-A, Harbeck N, von Au A, Naume B, Pierga J-Y, Hoffmann O, Beckmann MW, Rydén L, Fehm T, Aft R, Montserrat S, Walter V, Rack B, Schuetz F, Borgen E, Ta M-H, Bittner A-K, Fasching P, Fernö M, Krawczyk N, Weilbaecher K, Margelí M, Hahn M, Jueckstock J, Domschke C, Bidard F-C, Kasimir-Bauer S, Schoenfisch B, Kurt AG, Wallwiener M, Gebauer G, Wallwiener D, Janni W, Pantel K. International pooled analysis of the prognostic impact of disseminated tumor cells from the bone marrow in early breast cancer: Results from the PADDY study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-07.

#1081 Background: The purpose of this study was to identify a genomic signature of early metastatic recurrence, in order to predict accurately breast carcinomas clinical outcome and to select patients with node negative and small tumor size (<3cm) who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
 Patients and methods: Using genome-wide BAC-PAC Genomic Comparative Hybridization (CGH) array (1kb), we analyzed a training set of 78 patients. All patients had invasive ductal carcinomas and were initially treated by surgery and radiotherapy, without chemotherapy. The validation was performed on an independent test set of 90 patients. The training and tests sets were composed of respectively 53 and 58 patients disease-free survivors at 60 months (good prognosis group), and by 25 and 32 patients with distant metastatic recurrence before 48 months (poor prognosis group). In the training set, a signature was established as a logistic multivariate model of regions containing contiguous BAC clones with statistically different ratios and median frequencies of gains and losses between the poor and the good prognosis groups. This signature was then validated using the independent test set to evaluate its accuracy to classify T0T1T2N0 patients according to their outcome.
 Results: The training test identified a prognostic signature defined by 3 genomic regions, located on the 2p (38.3 to 40.9Mb), 3p (32 to 80.3Mb), and 8q (78.8 to 128.9Mb) chromosomes. In the test set, 90% of patients of favourable outcome were ER +ve and 88% were PR +ve, compared to 62% and 55% in the poor outcome group, respectively. In the test set, our signature was highly informative to identify patients that developed distant metastases before 48 months: the rate of patients well classified was 0.74, CI (95%): [0.64; 0.83], with a specificity of 95%, CI (95%): [86%; 99%]. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the poor-prognosis genomic signature group of patients had a RR of 3.5 of metastatic relapse (log rank test p<0.001).
 Conclusions: Our signature, validated on an independent series of small T0T1T2N0 and on a majority of ER/PR positive tumors, may provide a robust and accurate tool to identify, in addition to classical parameters, patients who would benefit from adjuvant medical treatments. The comparison of this genomic signature with RNA based signatures and clinico-pathological parameters, is currently being investigated. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 1081.

4086 Background: The combination of BEV and chemotherapy is highly effective in patients with mCRC and improves response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone. This randomized non-comparative phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of BEV in combination with either XELIRI or FOLFIRI as first-line therapy for mCRC. Methods: Patients were eligible for inclusion in this study if they had histologically proven measurable mCRC, were aged 18–75 years, and had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2. Patients were treated with 8 cycles of XELIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid on Days 1–14) + BEV 7.5 mg/kg on Day 1, every 3 weeks or 12 cycles of FOLFIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 + folinic acid 400 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 via 46-h infusion) + BEV 5 mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks. BEV was continued to disease progression. Patients aged ≥65 years received a lower daily dose of capecitabine (800 mg/m2 bid). The primary endpoint was crude progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Results: In total, 145 patients were entered in the study between March 2006 and January 2008; 72 patients received BEV + XELIRI and 73 patients received BEV + FOLFIRI (male 64%/48%; median age 61/61 years; 35/36% aged >65 years). Preliminary results from the first 6 months of follow-up are reported here. A total of 491/783 cycles was administered, 63%/67% receiving at least the initially planned number of cycles (8 cycles for BEV + XELIRI and 12 for BEV + FOLFIRI). Main results are given in the table . Conclusions: This randomized non-comparative study has shown that BEV + XELIRI and BEV + FOLFIRI are similarly effective treatments for patients with mCRC, with manageable toxicity profiles. Results with updated follow-up will be presented at the Meeting. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

#4118 Background: The addition of B (15mg/kg q3w) to 1st-line taxane therapy significantly improved PFS in pts with LR or mBC in 2 phase III studies, E2100 and AVADO. MO19391 investigated B plus 1st-line taxane-based chemotherapy (CTx) in LR or mBC to obtain safety and efficacy data in a community-based population.
 Methods: This open-label, multicentre study has completed enrolment of 2,000 pts with LR or mBC and an ECOG PS of 0–2. Exclusion criteria included prior CTx for LR or mBC and evidence of CNS metastases. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included TTP and OS. B was administered at 10mg/kg q2w or 15mg/kg q3w plus the physician's choice of taxane regimen (or investigator's SOC, excluding anthracyclines). Treatment with B continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. As well as AEs, attention was paid to AEs of special interest (hypertension, proteinuria, wound-healing complications, thromboembolic events, CNS bleeding, other haemorrhages, GI perforation, fistulae, RPLS and CHF). The safety population included all pts who received at least one dose of B.
 Results: As of March 2008, the safety population consisted of 1,553 pts from 35 countries. The median number of cycles received was 6 for both B (range 1–28) and CTx (range 1–28). Pts received: single-agent taxane 66.2%, taxane combination 13.5%, other single agent 8.5%, other combination 3.3%. Frequently reported AEs are shown below. Grade 3/4 AEs of special interest were reported in 6.3% of pts, most commonly hypertension 2.2%, proteinuria 0.7%, pulmonary embolism 0.5%, epistaxis 0.4%. AEs leading to death during the study phase were reported in 27 pts (1.7%)*.
 
 Conclusions: MO19391 is the largest study population of pts with LR or mBC receiving B plus CTx. Toxicity was low and preliminary results are consistent with previous B safety studies. Final analysis of the primary endpoint and secondary efficacy analyses will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 4118.