This paper examines whether the in vivo behavior of yeast glycolysis can be understood in terms of the in vitro kinetic properties of the constituent enzymes. In nongrowing, anaerobic, compressed Saccharomyces cerevisiae the values of the kinetic parameters of most glycolytic enzymes were determined. For the other enzymes appropriate literature values were collected. By inserting these values into a kinetic model for glycolysis, fluxes and metabolites were calculated. Under the same conditions fluxes and metabolite levels were measured.In our first model, branch reactions were ignored. This model failed to reach the stable steady state that was observed in the experimental flux measurements. Introduction of branches towards trehalose, glycogen, glycerol and succinate did allow such a steady state. The predictions of this branched model were compared with the empirical behavior. Half of the enzymes matched their predicted flux in vivo within a factor of 2. For the other enzymes it was calculated what deviation between in vivo and in vitro kinetic characteristics could explain the discrepancy between in vitro rate and in vivo flux.

735hardly imagine today's electronics industry, with its powerful, visually oriented design and automation tools, without having first established standard notations for circuit diagrams. Such was not the case in biology 2 . Despite the visual nature of much of the information exchange, the field was permeated with ad hoc graphical notations having little in common between different researchers, publications, textbooks and software tools. No standard visual language existed for describing biochemical interaction networks, inter-and intracellular signaling gene regulation-concepts at the core of much of today's research in molecular, systems and synthetic biology. The closest to a standard is the notation long used in many metabolic and signaling pathway maps, but in reality, even that lacks uniformity between sources and suffers from undesirable ambiguities (Fig. 1). Moreover, the existing tentative representations, however well crafted, were ambiguous, and only suitable for specific needs, such as representing metabolic networks or signaling pathways or gene regulation.The molecular biology era, and more recently the rise of genomics and other high-throughput technologies, have brought a staggering increase in data to be interpreted. It also favored the routine use of software to help formulate hypotheses, design experiments and interpret results. As a group of biochemists, modelers and computer scientists working in systems biology, we believe establishing standard graphical notations is an important step toward more efficient and accurate transmission of biological knowledge among our different communities. Toward this goal, we initiated the SBGN project in 2005, with the aim of developing and standardizing a systematic and unambiguous graphical notation for applications in molecular and systems biology. Historical antecedentsGraphical representation of biochemical and cellular processes has been used in biochemical textbooks as far back as sixty years ago 3 , reaching an apex in the wall charts hand drawn by Nicholson 4 and Michal 5 . Those graphs describe the processes that transform a set of inputs into a set of outputs, in effect being process, or state transition, diagrams. This style was emulated in the first database systems that depicted metabolic networks, including EMP 6 , EcoCyc 7 and KEGG 8 . More notations have been 'defined' by virtue of their implementation in specialized software tools such as pathway and network designers (e.g., NetBuilder 9 , Patika 10 , JDesigner 11 , CellDesigner 12 ). Those "Un bon croquis vaut mieux qu'un long discours" ("A good sketch is better than a long speech"), said Napoleon Bonaparte. This claim is nowhere as true as for technical illustrations. Diagrams naturally engage innate cognitive faculties 1 that humans have possessed since before the time of our cave-drawing ancestors. Little wonder that we find ourselves turning to them in every field of endeavor. Just as with written human languages, communication involving diagrams requires that authors and readers agr...

BioModels Database (), part of the international initiative BioModels.net, provides access to published, peer-reviewed, quantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems. Each model is carefully curated to verify that it corresponds to the reference publication and gives the proper numerical results. Curators also annotate the components of the models with terms from controlled vocabularies and links to other relevant data resources. This allows the users to search accurately for the models they need. The models can currently be retrieved in the SBML format, and import/export facilities are being developed to extend the spectrum of formats supported by the resource.

BackgroundQuantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems are used to answer a variety of questions in the biological sciences. The number of published quantitative models is growing steadily thanks to increasing interest in the use of models as well as the development of improved software systems and the availability of better, cheaper computer hardware. To maximise the benefits of this growing body of models, the field needs centralised model repositories that will encourage, facilitate and promote model dissemination and reuse. Ideally, the models stored in these repositories should be extensively tested and encoded in community-supported and standardised formats. In addition, the models and their components should be cross-referenced with other resources in order to allow their unambiguous identification.DescriptionBioModels Database http://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels/ is aimed at addressing exactly these needs. It is a freely-accessible online resource for storing, viewing, retrieving, and analysing published, peer-reviewed quantitative models of biochemical and cellular systems. The structure and behaviour of each simulation model distributed by BioModels Database are thoroughly checked; in addition, model elements are annotated with terms from controlled vocabularies as well as linked to relevant data resources. Models can be examined online or downloaded in various formats. Reaction network diagrams generated from the models are also available in several formats. BioModels Database also provides features such as online simulation and the extraction of components from large scale models into smaller submodels. Finally, the system provides a range of web services that external software systems can use to access up-to-date data from the database.ConclusionsBioModels Database has become a recognised reference resource for systems biology. It is being used by the community in a variety of ways; for example, it is used to benchmark different simulation systems, and to study the clustering of models based upon their annotations. Model deposition to the database today is advised by several publishers of scientific journals. The models in BioModels Database are freely distributed and reusable; the underlying software infrastructure is also available from SourceForge https://sourceforge.net/projects/biomodels/ under the GNU General Public License.

Most of the published quantitative models in biology are lost for the community because they are either not made available or they are insufficiently characterized to allow them to be reused. The lack of a standard description format, lack of stringent reviewing and authors' carelessness are the main causes for incomplete model descriptions. With today's increased interest in detailed biochemical models, it is necessary to define a minimum quality standard for the encoding of those models. We propose a set of rules for curating quantitative models of biological systems. These rules define procedures for encoding and annotating models represented in machine-readable form. We believe their application will enable users to (i) have confidence that curated models are an accurate reflection of their associated reference descriptions, (ii) search collections of curated models with precision, (iii) quickly identify the biological phenomena that a given curated model or model constituent represents and (iv) facilitate model reuse and composition into large subcellular models.During the genomic era we have witnessed a vast increase in availability of large amounts of quantitative data. This is motivating a shift in the focus of molecular and cellular research from qualitative descriptions of biochemical interactions towards the quantification of such interactions and their dynamics. One of the tenets of systems biology is the use of quantitative models (see Box 1 for definitions) as a mechanism for capturing precise hypotheses and making predictions 1,2 . Many specialized models exist that attempt to explain aspects of the cellular machinery. However, as has happened with other types of biological information, such as sequences, macromolecular structures or Box 1 GlossarySome terms are used in a very specific way throughout the article. We provide here a precise definition of each one.Quantitative biochemical model. A formal model of a biological system, based on the mathematical description of its molecular and cellular components, and the interactions between those components.Encoded model. A mathematical model written in a formal machine-readable language, such that it can be systematically parsed and employed by simulation and analysis software without further human translation. MIRIAM-compliant model. A model that passes all the tests and fulfills all the conditions listed in MIRIAM.Reference description. A unique document that describes, or references the description of the model, the structure of the model, the numerical values necessary to instantiate a simulation from the model, or to perform a mathematical analysis of the model, and the results one expects from such a simulation or analysis.Curation process. The process by which the compliance of an encoded model with MIRIAM is achieved and/or verified. The curation process may encompass some or all of the following tasks: encoding of the model, verification of the reference correspondence and annotation of the model.Reference correspondence. The fact that the...