Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder, starting in early childhood and persisting into adulthood in the majority of cases. Family and twin studies have demonstrated the importance of genetic factors and candidate gene association studies have identified several loci that exert small but significant effects on ADHD. To provide further clarification of reported associations and identify novel associated genes, we examined 1038 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning 51 candidate genes involved in the regulation of neurotransmitter pathways, particularly dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin pathways, in addition to circadian rhythm genes. Analysis used within family tests of association in a sample of 776 DSM-IV ADHD combined type cases ascertained for the International Multi-centre ADHD Gene project. We found nominal significance with one or more SNPs in 18 genes, including the two most replicated findings in the literature: DRD4 and DAT1. Gene-wide tests, adjusted for the number of SNPs analysed in each gene, identified associations with TPH2, ARRB2, SYP, DAT1, ADRB2, HES1, MAOA and PNMT. Further studies will be needed to confirm or refute the observed associations and their generalisability to other samples. Molecular Psychiatry (2006) 11, 934-953.

It is hypothesised that autism symptoms are present in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), are familial and index subtypes of ADHD. Autism symptoms were compared in 821 ADHD probands, 1050 siblings and 149 controls. Shared familiality of autism symptoms and ADHD was calculated using DeFriesFulker analysis. Autism symptoms were higher in probands than siblings or controls, and higher in male siblings than male controls. Autism symptoms were familial, partly shared with familiality of ADHD in males. Latent class analysis using SCQ-score yielded five classes; Class 1(31%) had few autism symptoms and low comorbidity; Classes 2-4 were intermediate; Class 5(7%) had high autism symptoms and comorbidity. Thus autism symptoms

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a discrete clinical syndrome characterized by the triad of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity in the context of marked impairments. Molecular genetic studies have been successful in identifying genetic variants associated with ADHD, particularly with DSM-IV inattentive and combined subtypes. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) approaches to linkage and association mapping have yet to be widely used in ADHD research, although twin studies investigating individual differences suggest that genetic liability for ADHD is continuously distributed throughout the population, underscoring the applicability of quantitative dimensional approaches. To investigate the appropriateness of QTL approaches, we tested the familial association between 894 probands with a research diagnosis of DSM-IV ADHD combined type and continuous trait measures among 1,135 of their siblings unselected for phenotype. The sibling recurrence rate for ADHD combined subtype was 12.7%, yielding a sibling recurrence risk ratio (l sib ) of 9.0. Estimated sibling correlations around 0.2-0.3 are similar to those estimated from the analysis of fraternal twins in population twin samples. We further show that there are no threshold effects on the sibling risk for ADHD among the ADHD probands; and that both affected and unaffected siblings contributed to the association with ADHD trait scores. In conclusion, these data confirm the main requirement for QTL mapping of ADHD by demonstrating that narrowly defined DSM-IV combined type probands show familial association with dimensional ADHD symptom scores amongst their siblings. INTRODUCTIONAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common and heritable disorder that starts in early childhood and is characterized by developmentally inappropriate levels of hyperactive, impulsive, and inattentive behaviors accompanied by psychosocial impairments. The disorder is known to aggregate in families, with recent estimates suggesting a fourto sixfold increase in the risk for ADHD among first-degree relatives of ADHD probands [Faraone et al., 2000;Brookes et al., 2006a]. Twin studies using parent and teacher rated ADHD symptom scales demonstrate the predominant role of genetic factors with heritability estimates in the range 60-90% [Thapar et al., 1999;Faraone et al., 2005]. Molecular genetic studies using candidate gene association approaches have yielded positive findings with dopamine and related monoamine neurotransmitter genes, in particular with genetic variants of the dopamine transporter, dopamine D4 and D5 receptor genes [reviewed in Asherson and The Image Consortium, 2004;Faraone et al., 2005;Brookes et al., 2006b;Li et al., 2006;Asherson et al., 2007]. Linkage studies using affected sib-pair or extended pedigree approaches have identified chromosomal regions containing putative risk alleles for ADHD [Fisher et al., 2002a;Bakker et al., 2003;Ogdie et al., 2003Ogdie et al., , 2004Ogdie et al., , 2006Arcos-Burgos et al., 2004;Hebebrand et al., 2006].I...

Monoamine oxidase A (MAO A) is located on the X chromosome and metabolizes biogenic amines including dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin. A functional promoter-region polymorphism of this gene has been described that has been studied in a number of mental illnesses but not in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In the current study, we examined the MAO A promoter-region polymorphism initially in 133 triads and observed preferential transmission of the long alleles from 74 heterozygote mothers to ADHD probands ( 2 = 4.37, P = 0.036, df = 1). We also examined the role of this polymorphism in a computerized continuous performance test, the TOVA. Significant differences were observed on errors of commission ( 2 = 7.021, P = 0.008) and patients carrying the long MAO A allele made significantly more such errors. Errors of commission are a measure of impulsivity. However, following Ritalin (methylphenidate) administration the association between this polymorphism and errors of commission was markedly attenuated and no longer significant at the P Ͻ 0.05 level. We also analyzed the provisional association by the case-control design. A significant difference in allele frequency was observed between 110 male probands vs 202 male controls (Pearson 2 = 7.94, P = 0.047). Similarly results were obtained when 19 female probands were compared to female controls (genotype 2 = 21.28; P = 0.0032, 3 df and allele 2 = 30.88, P = 0.0007, 2 df). All three complementary approaches employed (family-based, case-control and quantitative trait design) suggest a role for the MAO A promoter-region polymorphism in conferring risk for ADHD in our patient population.

BackgroundThe International Multi-centre ADHD Genetics (IMAGE) project with 11 participating centres from 7 European countries and Israel has collected a large behavioural and genetic database for present and future research. Behavioural data were collected from 1068 probands with the combined type of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD-CT) and 1446 'unselected' siblings. The aim was to analyse the IMAGE sample with respect to demographic features (gender, age, family status, and recruiting centres) and psychopathological characteristics (diagnostic subtype, symptom frequencies, age at symptom detection, and comorbidities). A particular focus was on the effects of the study design and the diagnostic procedure on the homogeneity of the sample in terms of symptom-based behavioural data, and potential consequences for further analyses based on these data.MethodsDiagnosis was based on the Parental Account of Childhood Symptoms (PACS) interview and the DSM-IV items of the Conners' teacher questionnaire. Demographics of the full sample and the homogeneity of a subsample (all probands) were analysed by using robust statistical procedures which were adjusted for unequal sample sizes and skewed distributions. These procedures included multi-way analyses based on trimmed means and winsorised variances as well as bootstrapping.ResultsAge and proband/sibling ratios differed between participating centres. There was no significant difference in the distribution of gender between centres. There was a significant interaction between age and centre for number of inattentive, but not number of hyperactive symptoms. Higher ADHD symptom frequencies were reported by parents than teachers. The diagnostic symptoms differed from each other in their frequencies. The face-to-face interview was more sensitive than the questionnaire. The differentiation between ADHD-CT probands and unaffected siblings was mainly due to differences in hyperactive/impulsive symptoms.ConclusionsDespite a symptom-based standardized inclusion procedure according to DSM-IV criteria with defined symptom thresholds, centres may differ markedly in probands' ADHD symptom frequencies. Both the diagnostic procedure and the multi-centre design influence the behavioural characteristics of a sample and, thus, may bias statistical analyses, particularly in genetic or neurobehavioral studies.