Increased intima-media thickness (IMT) is a non-invasive marker of early arterial wall alteration, which is easily assessed in the carotid artery by B-mode ultrasound, and more and more widely used in clinical research. Methods of IMT measurement can be categorized by two approaches: (i) measurement at multiple extracranial carotid sites in near and far walls and (ii) computerized measurement restricted to the far wall of the distal common carotid artery. Because IMT reflects global cardiovascular risk, its normal value might be better defined in terms of increased risk rather than in terms of statistical distribution within a healthy population. The available epidemiological data indicate that increased IMT (at or above 1 mm) represents a risk of myocardial infarction and/or cerebrovascular disease. Close relationships have been shown between: (i) most traditional cardiovascular risk factors; (ii) certain emerging risk factors such as lipoproteins, psychosocial status, plasma viscosity, or hyperhomocysteinemia; and (iii) various cardiovascular or organ damages such as white matter lesion of the brain, left ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria or decreased ankle to brachial systolic pressure index. Thus, IMT gives a comprehensive picture of the alterations caused by multiple risk factors over time on arterial walls. Prospective primary and secondary prevention studies have also shown that increased IMT is a powerful predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular complications (risk ratio from 2 to 6) with a higher predictive value when IMT is measured at multiple extracranial carotid sites than solely in the distal common carotid artery. Therapeutic double-blind trials have shown that lipid-lowering drugs, such as resin and overall statines, and to a lesser extent antihypertensive drugs, such as calcium antagonists, may have a beneficial effect on IMT progression in asymptomatic or in coronary patients. However, methodological standardization of IMT measurement still needs to be implemented before routine measurement of IMT can be proposed in clinical practice as a diagnostic tool for stratifying cardiovascular risk in primary prevention and for aggressive treatment decision. It can be anticipated however, that the presence of increased carotid IMT in one individual with intermediate cardiovascular risk would lead to his classification into the high-risk category and thus influence the aggressiveness of risk factor modifications.

We compared the properties of common carotid and femoral arteries of 16 normotensive and 14 hypertensive men. Arterial pressure and diameter were recorded noninvasively in each vessel by tonometric and echotracking devices. The x-y composition of pressure and diameter waves provided the diameter-pressure hysteresis loop. The elastic diameter-pressure curve and wall viscosity index were deduced after hysteresis elimination. The compliance-pressure and distensibility-pressure curves were derived from the diameter-pressure curve, allowing the calculation of effective compliance and distensibility at the prevailing pressure of each subject and isobaric compliance and distensibility at the same standard pressure in all subjects. Systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse pressures and diameters in each vessel were higher in the hypertensive than the normotensive group, except carotid pulse diameter, which did not differ. The carotid diameter-pressure, compliance-pressure, and distensibility-pressure curves did not differ between groups. In the carotid artery hypertensive patients had isobaric compliance and distensibility values similar to those of normotensive subjects, despite lower effective compliance (P < .05) and distensibility (P < .01). The femoral diameter-pressure curve was higher (P < .05) and the femoral compliance-pressure and distensibility-pressure curves were lower (P < .01) in the hypertensive than the normotensive group. Hypertensive patients had effective and isobaric femoral compliance and distensibility values lower than to those of normotensive subjects (P < .001). In both arteries, viscosity index was higher in the hypertensive than the normotensive group (P < .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)