Importance Early phase trials with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have demonstrated durable clinical responses in patients with NSCLC, however, current assays for the prognostic/predictive role of tumor PD-L1 expression are not standardized with respect to either quantity or distribution of expression. Objective In this study, we demonstrate PD-L1 protein distribution in NSCLC tumors using both conventional immunohistochemistry (IHC) and quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF), and compare results obtained using two different PD-L1 antibodies. Design PD-L1 was measured using two rabbit monoclonal antibodies (E1L3N and SP142) in 49 NSCLC whole tissue sections and a corresponding tissue microarray with the same 49 cases. Mel624 cells stably transfected with PD-L1, as well as Mel624 parental cells and human term placenta were used as controls and for antibody validation. PD-L1 protein expression in tumor and stroma was assessed using chromogenic IHC and the AQUA® method of QIF. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were scored in hematoxylin/eosin stained slides using current consensus guidelines. The association between PD-L1 protein expression, TILs, and clinico-pathological features were determined. Setting NSCLC resections were all performed at Yale New Haven Hospital. Participants NSCLC resection cases from 2011–2012 were collected retrospectively from the Yale Thoracic Oncology Program Tissue Bank in Yale Pathology based on tissue availability. Main Outcome Measure PD-L1 expression discordance or heterogeneity using DAB and QIF was the main outcome measure selected prior to performing the study. Results Using chromogenic IHC, both antibodies showed fair to poor concordance. QIF showed that PD-L1 expression using both PD-L1 antibodies was heterogeneous. Using QIF, the scores obtained with E1L3N and SP142 for each tumor were significantly different according to nonparametric-paired test (p <0.001). Assessment of 588 serial section fields of view by QIF showed discordant expression at a frequency of 25%. Expression of PD-L1 using both E1L3N and SP142 was correlated with high TILs (p = 0.007 and p = 0.021). Conclusions Objective determination of PD-L1 protein levels in NSCLC reveals heterogeneity within tumors and prominent inter-assay variability or discordance. This could be due to different antibody affinities, limited specificity, or distinct target epitopes. Efforts to determine the clinical value of these observations are underway.

Importance Four assays have been registered with the FDA to detect PD-L1 to enrich for patient response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. The tests use four separate PD-L1 antibodies on two separate staining platforms and have their own scoring systems which raises questions about their similarity and potential cross-utilization. Objective We compared the performance of four PD-L1 platforms, including two FDA-cleared assays and two laboratory developed tests (LDTs). Design Four serial histology sections from 90 archival NSCLCs were distributed to three sites that performed the following IHCs: 1) 28-8 antibody on Dako Link 48; 2) 22c3 antibody on Dako Link 48; 3) SP142 antibody on Ventana Benchmark; and 4) E1L3N antibody on Leica Bond. Slides were scanned and scored by thirteen pathologists by estimating the percentage of malignant and immune cells expressing PD-L1. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and paired and mixed effects statistical analyses were performed to compare antibodies and pathologists scoring of tumor and immune cells. Results The SP142 Ventana assay was an outlier with a significantly lower mean score of PD-L1 expression in both tumor and immune cells. Pairwise comparisons showed the 28-8 and E1L3N were not significantly different, but that 22c3 showed a slight but statistically significant reduction in tumor cell labeling. Evaluation of ICC between antibodies to quantify inter-assay variability using the average of thirteen pathologists scores for tumor shows very high concordance between antibodies for tumor cell scoring (0.813) and lower levels of concordance for immune cell scoring (0.277). When examining inter-pathologists variability for any single antibody, the concordance between pathologists’ reads for tumor ranged from ICC of 0.83 to 0.88 for each antibody while the ICC from immune cells for each antibody ranged from 0.17 to 0.23. Conclusions The assay using the SP142 antibody is a clear outlier detecting significantly less tumor cell and immune cell PD-L1 expression. Antibody 22c3 shows slight yet statistically significantly lower staining than either 28-8 or E1L3N, but this significance is only detected when using the average of thirteen pathologist scores. Pathologists show excellent concordance when scoring tumor cells stained with any antibody, but poor concordance for scoring immune cell staining.

BackgroundAmyloid plaques, a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD), are accompanied by activated microglia. The role of activated microglia in the pathogenesis of AD remains controversial: either clearing Aβ deposits by phagocytosis or releasing proinflammatory cytokines and cytotoxic substances. Microglia can be activated via toll-like receptors (TLRs), a class of pattern-recognition receptors in the innate immune system. We previously demonstrated that an AD mouse model homozygous for a loss-of-function mutation of TLR4 had increases in Aβ deposits and buffer-soluble Aβ in the brain as compared with a TLR4 wild-type AD mouse model at 14-16 months of age. However, it is unknown if TLR4 signaling is involved in initiation of Aβ deposition as well as activation and recruitment of microglia at the early stage of AD. Here, we investigated the role of TLR4 signaling and microglial activation in early stages using 5-month-old AD mouse models when Aβ deposits start.MethodsMicroglial activation and amyloid deposition in the brain were determined by immunohistochemistry in the AD models. Levels of cerebral soluble Aβ were determined by ELISA. mRNA levels of cytokines and chemokines in the brain and Aβ-stimulated monocytes were quantified by real-time PCR. Cognitive functions were assessed by the Morris water maze.ResultsWhile no difference was found in cerebral Aβ load between AD mouse models at 5 months with and without TLR4 mutation, microglial activation in a TLR4 mutant AD model (TLR4M Tg) was less than that in a TLR4 wild-type AD model (TLR4W Tg). At 9 months, TLR4M Tg mice had increased Aβ deposition and soluble Aβ42 in the brain, which were associated with decrements in cognitive functions and expression levels of IL-1β, CCL3, and CCL4 in the hippocampus compared to TLR4W Tg mice. TLR4 mutation diminished Aβ-induced IL-1β, CCL3, and CCL4 expression in monocytes.ConclusionThis is the first demonstration of TLR4-dependent activation of microglia at the early stage of β-amyloidosis. Our results indicate that TLR4 is not involved in the initiation of Aβ deposition and that, as Aβ deposits start, microglia are activated via TLR4 signaling to reduce Aβ deposits and preserve cognitive functions from Aβ-mediated neurotoxicity.

Importance There are at least four immunohistochemistry assays for PD-L1 at various stages of interaction with the FDA as companion or complementary diagnostic tests for benefit from PD-1 axis therapies. The performance of each assay for selection of patients that respond to therapy has been published, but no data has been published that compares the assays to one another or to direct measurements of PD-L1. Objective To determine whether the antibody reagents are interchangeable, we quantitatively compared expression of PD-L1 protein using six monoclonal antibodies (SP142, E1L3N, 9A11, SP263, 22c3 and 28-8). Design To test for protein measurement, rather than clinical utility, we created a PD-L1 index tissue microarray including cell line and tissue controls, in addition to 30 NSCLC cases with full dynamic range of PD-L1 expression. We then validated our results on a commercially available, genetically defined PD-L1 engineered cell line array with a range of controlled protein expressing cell lines. Protein levels were measured by both quantitative immunofluorescence and quantitative chromogenic assessment. Results Concordance between 4 antibodies showed regression (R2 values) between 0.42-0.91 for tumor tissue cores and 0.83-0.97 for cells line cores by QIF in the PD-L1 index tissue microarray. All six antibodies showed high levels of concordance (R2 ranging from 0.76 to 0.99) when using chromogenic staining in isogenic cell lines. Conclusions and Relevance Since the antibodies are highly concordant, these results suggest that assays based on the use of these antibodies could yield concordant results. They further suggest that previously described differences in PD-L1 expression in tissue is independent of the antibody utilized and likely due to tumor heterogeneity, assay/platform-specific variables or other factors.