Compared with the ALD group, the AUF group trended toward a longer time to first HF event within 90 days and fewer HF and cardiovascular events. More patients in the AUF group experienced special interest or serious product-related adverse event. Due to the trial's untimely termination, additional AUF investigation is warranted.

Background Orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has been successful in the treatment of light chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis. The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of survival to OHT in patients with end stage heart failure due to AL amyloidosis, and compare post-OHT survival of cardiac amyloid patients to that of other cardiomyopathy patients undergoing OHT. Methods From January 2000 to June 2011, 31 patients with end stage heart failure secondary to AL amyloidosis were listed for OHT at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified predictors of survival to OHT. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared survival between MGH amyloidosis patients and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) non-amyloid cardiomyopathy patients. Results Low body mass index (BMI) was the only predictor of survival to OHT in patients with end stage heart failure due to cardiac amyloidosis. Survival of cardiac amyloid patients who died prior to receiving a donor heart was only 63 ± 45 days after listing. Patients who survived to OHT received a donor organ at 53 ± 48 days after listing. Survival of AL amyloidosis patients on the waitlist was less than patients waitlisted for all other non-amyloid diagnoses. The long-term survival of transplanted amyloid patients was no different than the survival of non-amyloid, restrictive (p=0.34), non-amyloid dilated (p=0.34) or all non-amyloid cardiomyopathy patients (p=0.22) in the SRTR database. Conclusions Those that survive to OHT followed by ASCT have a survival rate similar to other cardiomyopathy patients undergoing OHT. However, more than one third of the patients died awaiting OHT. The only predictor of survival to OHT in AL amyloidosis patients was low BMI, which correlated with shorter waitlist time. To optimize the survival of these patients, access to donor organs must be improved. In light chain (AL) amyloidosis, amyloid fibrils derived from clonal lambda or kappa immunoglobulin light chains deposit abnormally in organs. Cardiac involvement is apparent echocardiographically in 60% of AL amyloidosis patients at the time of diagnosis, with clinical evidence of heart failure in 69% of patients.1 The median survival of AL amyloidosis patients presenting with any heart failure symptom is 8.5 months2 and even less for end-stage heart failure pateints.

Background Clinical complexity is increasingly prevalent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The ‘Atrial fibrillation Better Care’ (ABC) pathway approach has been proposed to streamline a more holistic and integrated approach to AF care; however, there are limited data on its usefulness among clinically complex patients. We aim to determine the impact of ABC pathway in a contemporary cohort of clinically complex AF patients. Methods From the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry, we analysed clinically complex AF patients, defined as the presence of frailty, multimorbidity and/or polypharmacy. A K-medoids cluster analysis was performed to identify different groups of clinical complexity. The impact of an ABC-adherent approach on major outcomes was analysed through Cox-regression analyses and delay of event (DoE) analyses. Results Among 9966 AF patients included, 8289 (83.1%) were clinically complex. Adherence to the ABC pathway in the clinically complex group reduced the risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.72, 95%CI 0.58–0.91), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; aHR: 0.68, 95%CI 0.52–0.87) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.70, 95%CI: 0.58–0.85). Adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (aHR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.56–0.98) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.76, 95%CI 0.60–0.96) also in the high-complexity cluster; similar trends were observed for MACEs. In DoE analyses, an ABC-adherent approach resulted in significant gains in event-free survival for all the outcomes investigated in clinically complex patients. Based on absolute risk reduction at 1 year of follow-up, the number needed to treat for ABC pathway adherence was 24 for all-cause death, 31 for MACEs and 20 for the composite outcome. Conclusions An ABC-adherent approach reduces the risk of major outcomes in clinically complex AF patients. Ensuring adherence to the ABC pathway is essential to improve clinical outcomes among clinically complex AF patients.