Purpose: Molecular classification of breast cancer has been proposed based on gene expression profiles of human tumors. Luminal, basal-like, normal-like, and erbB2+ subgroups were identified and were shown to have different prognoses. The goal of this research was to determine if these different molecular subtypes of breast cancer also respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Fine needle aspirations of 82 breast cancers were obtained before starting preoperative paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Gene expression profiling was done with Affymetrix U133A microarrays and the previously reported ''breast intrinsic''gene set was used for hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling to assign molecular class. Results: The basal-like and erbB2+ subgroups were associated with the highest rates of pathologic complete response (CR), 45% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 24-68] and 45% (95% CI, 23-68), respectively, whereas the luminal tumors had a pathologic CR rate of 6% (95% CI, 1-21). No pathologic CR was observed among the normal-like cancers (95% CI, 0-31). Molecular class was not independent of conventional cliniocopathologic predictors of response such as estrogen receptor status and nuclear grade. None of the 61genes associated with pathologic CR in the basal-like group were associated with pathologic CR in the erbB2+ group, suggesting that the molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy sensitivity may vary between these two estrogen receptor^negative subtypes. Conclusions: The basal-like and erbB2+ subtypes of breast cancer are more sensitive to paclitaxel-and doxorubicin-containing preoperative chemotherapy than the luminal and normallike cancers.Breast cancer is a clinically heterogeneous disease. Histologically similar tumors may have different prognoses and may respond to therapy differently. It is believed that these differences in clinical behavior are due to molecular differences between histologically similar tumors. DNA microarray technology is ideally suited to reveal such molecular differences. A novel molecular classification of breast cancer based on gene expression profiles was recently proposed (1). The investigators identified a set of stably expressed genes (''intrinsic gene set''; n = 534) that accounted for much of the molecular differences between 42 breast cancers and did hierarchical cluster analysis to identify subgroups of cancers with separate gene expression profiles. Luminal, basal-like, normal-like, and erbB2+ subgroups were identified and were shown to have different prognoses (1 -4). These results were confirmed in follow-up experiments by the same group and others using larger numbers of cases. The basal-like (mostly estrogen receptor negative) and erbB2+ (mostly HER-2 amplified and estrogen receptor negative) subgroups had the shortest relapse-free and overall survival, whereas the luminal-type (estrogen receptorpositive) tumors had a more favorable clinical outcome (2 -4).

The HER-2/neu oncogene encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to the epidermal growth factor receptor. In this review, the association of HER-2/neu gene and protein abnormalities with prognosis and response to therapy with trastuzumab and to other therapies in breast cancer is presented. By considering a series of 80 published studies encompassing more than 25,000 patients, the relative advantages and disadvantages of Southern blotting, polymerase chain reaction amplification, andThe Oncologist 2003;8:307-325 www.TheOncologist.comCorrespondence: Jeffrey S. Ross, M.D., Albany Medical College, Department of Pathology, Mail Code 81, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, New York 12208, USA. Telephone: 518-262-5461; Fax: 518-262-8092; e-mail: rossj@mail.amc.edu Received February 5, 2003; accepted for publication April 28, 2003. ©AlphaMed Press 1083-7159/2003 The Oncologist ® LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this course, the reader will be able to:1. Define the historical background and biological basis of the discovery of the HER-2/neu gene and its first use as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.2. Recall the uses of HER-2/neu testing prior to the approval of trastuzumab including the impact on anthracycline adjuvant and first-line chemotherapy responses.3. Explain the basic principles of all the HER-2/neu tests in clinical practice: IHC, FISH, Southern blot, PCR, tissue ELISA, and serum ELISA.4. Contrast the pros and cons and uses and limitations of the IHC versus the FISH approach to HER-2/neu testing.5. Critique the most recent data comparing IHC with FISH for the prediction of response to single-agent trastuzumab and trastuzumab in combination with standard chemotherapy for advanced metastatic breast cancer.6. Describe the HER-2/neu expression patterns in all types of breast conditions, including in situ carcinoma, lobular versus ductal carcinoma, Paget's disease, male breast cancer, breast sarcomas, and benign breast disorders.Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com CME CME This material is protected by U.S. Copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. For reprints contact: Reprints@AlphaMedPress.com Ross, Fletcher, Linette et al. 308 HER-2/NEU GENE (C-ERBB-2)The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)/neu (c-erbB-2) gene is localized to chromosome 17q and encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor protein that is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or HER family ( Fig. 1) [1]. This family of receptors is involved in cell-to-cell and cell-to-stroma communication primarily through a process known as signal transduction, in which external growth factors, or ligands, affect the transcription of various genes by phosphorylating or dephosphorylating a series of transmembrane proteins and intracellular signaling intermediates, many of which possess enzymatic activity. Signal propagation occurs as the enzymatic activity of one protein turns on the enzymat...

Breast cancers show variable sensitivity to paclitaxel. There is no diagnostic test to identify tumors that are sensitive to this drug. We used U133A chips to identify genes that are associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) to preoperative paclitaxelcontaining chemotherapy in stage I-III breast cancer (n ‫؍‬ 82). Tau was the most differentially expressed gene. Tumors with pCR had significantly lower (P < 0.3 ؋ 10 ؊5 ) mRNA expression. Tissue arrays from 122 independent but similarly treated patients were used for validation by immunohistochemistry. Seventy-four percent of pCR cases were tau protein negative; the odds ratio for pCR was 3.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.6 -8.6; P ϭ 0.0013). In multivariate analysis, nuclear grade (P < 0.01), age <50 (P ϭ 0.03), and taunegative status (P ϭ 0.04) were independent predictors of pCR. Small interfering RNA experiments were performed to examine whether down-regulation of tau increases sensitivity to chemotherapy in vitro. Down-regulation of tau increased sensitivity of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel but not to epirubicin. Tubulin polymerization assay was used to assess whether tau modulates binding of paclitaxel to tubulin. Preincubation of tubulin with tau resulted in decreased paclitaxel binding and reduced paclitaxelinduced microtubule polymerization. These data suggest that low tau expression renders microtubules more vulnerable to paclitaxel and makes breast cancer cells hypersensitive to this drug. Low tau expression may be used as a marker to select patients for paclitaxel therapy. Inhibition of tau function might be exploited as a therapeutic strategy to increase sensitivity to paclitaxel. adjuvant therapy ͉ drug resistance