Atezolizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody targeting human programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (MUC) and is being investigated in various malignancies. This analysis based upon 906 patients from two phase I and one phase II MUC studies, is the first report of the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of atezolizumab. Atezolizumab exhibited linear PK over a dose range of 1-20 mg/kg, including the labeled 1,200 mg dose. The clearance, volume of distribution, and terminal half-life estimates from population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis of 0.200 L/day, 6.91 L, and 27 days, respectively, were as expected for an IgG1. Exposure-response analyses did not identify statistically significant relationships with either objective response rate or adverse events of grades 3-5 or of special interest. None of the statistically significant covariates from PopPK (body weight, gender, antitherapeutic antibody, albumin, and tumor burden) would require dose adjustment.

(2012) Minipig as a potential translatable model for monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous administration, mAbs, 4:2, 243-255,

Intravenous administration of a humanized monoclonal antibody of IgE (E25) attenuates the early and late phase response to inhaled allergen in allergic asthmatic subjects. To test whether direct delivery of E25 to the airway might have the same effect, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, three group study in 33 subjects with mild allergic asthma (20 to 46 yr of age, 21 men, FEV(1) > 70% predicted). The airway responses to aerosolized allergen were determined at baseline, after 2 and 8 wk of once daily treatment with aerosolized placebo (n = 11), aerosolized E25 1 mg (n = 12), or aerosolized E25 10 mg (n = 10), and after 4 wk of treatment withdrawal. We found that E25 was detectable in the serum during aerosol treatment, although serum IgE did not change significantly in any of the three groups during treatment. In addition, both doses of E25 were no more effective than placebo in attenuating the early phase responses to allergen at both times during treatment. Although aerosolized E25 was generally well tolerated, one subject receiving aerosolized E25 10 mg daily was found to have serum IgG and IgA antibodies to E25. We conclude that aerosol administration of an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody does not inhibit the airway responses to inhaled allergen in allergic asthmatic subjects. We speculate that the observed lack of efficacy may be due to the inability of aerosol route of delivery to result in high enough concentrations of E25 in the tissue compartments surrounding IgE effector cells to neutralize IgE arising from local airway and pulmonary sources and IgE arising from the vascular space. Additionally, the aerosol route of delivery of monoclonal antibodies may be more immunogenic than the parenteral route.

BackgroundThe iMATRIX-atezolizumab study was a phase I/II, multicenter, open-label study designed to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adult patients. We describe the pharmacokinetics (PK), exposure-safety, and immunogenicity of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adults with metastatic solid tumors or hematologic malignancies enrolled in this study.MethodsPatients aged < 18 years (n = 69) received a weight-adjusted dose of atezolizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks [q3w]; maximum 1200 mg); those aged ≥ 18 years (n = 18) received a flat dose (1200 mg q3w). A prior two-compartment intravenous infusion input adult population-PK (popPK) model of atezolizumab was used as a basis to model pediatric data.ResultsA total of 431 atezolizumab serum concentrations from 87 relapse-refractory pediatric and young adult patients enrolled in the iMATRIX-atezolizumab study were used for the popPK analysis. The dataset comprised predominantly patients aged < 18 years, including two infants aged < 2 years, with a wide body weight and age range. The clearance and volume of distribution estimates of atezolizumab were 0.217 L/day and 3.01 L, respectively. Atezolizumab geometric mean trough exposures were ~ 20% lower in pediatric patients versus young adults; this was not clinically meaningful as both groups achieved the target concentration (6 μg/mL). Safety was similar between pediatric and young adult patients with no exposure-safety relationship observed. Limited responses (4/87) precluded an exposure-response assessment on outcomes. A comparable rate (13% vs 11%) of atezolizumab anti-drug antibodies was seen in pediatric and young adult patients.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate a similar exposure-safety profile of atezolizumab in pediatric and young adult patients, supportive of weight-based dosing in pediatric patients.Trial registrationNCT02541604.