Since 1999, health officials have documented the spread of West Nile virus across the eastern and southern states and into the central United States. In 2002, a large, multi-state, epidemic of neuroinvasive West Nile illness occurred. Using standardized guidelines, health departments conducted surveillance for West Nile virus illness in humans, and West Nile virus infection and illness in non-human species. Illnesses were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through the ArboNET system. In 2002, 39 states and the District of Columbia reported 4,156 human West Nile virus illness cases. Of these, 2,942 (71%) were neuroinvasive illnesses (i.e., meningitis, encephalitis, or meningoencephalitis) with onset dates from May 19 through December 14; 1,157 (28%) were uncomplicated West Nile fever cases, and 47 (1%) were clinically unspecified. Over 80% of neuroinvasive illnesses occurred in the central United States. Among meningitis cases, median age was 46 years (range, 3 months to 91 years), and the fatality-to-case ratio was 2%; for encephalitis cases (with or without meningitis), median age was 64 years (range, 1 month to 99 years) and the fatality-to-case ratio was 12%. Neuroinvasive illness incidence and mortality, respectively, were significantly associated with advanced age (p = 0.02; p = 0.01) and being male (p < 0.001; p = 0.002). In 89% of counties reporting neuroinvasive human illnesses, West Nile virus infections were first noted in non-human species, but no human illnesses were reported from 77% of counties in which non-human infections were detected. In 2002, West Nile virus caused the largest recognized epidemic of neuroinvasive arboviral illness in the Western Hemisphere and the largest epidemic of neuroinvasive West Nile virus ever recorded. It is unknown why males appeared to have higher risk of severe illness and death, but possibilities include higher prevalence of co-morbid conditions or behavioral factors leading to increased infection rates. Several observations, including major, multi-state West Nile virus epidemics in 2002 and 2003, suggest that major epidemics may annually reoccur in the United States. Non-human surveillance can warn of early West Nile virus activity and needs continued emphasis, along with control of Culex mosquitoes.

No abstract

IMPORTANCEAs self-collected home antigen tests become widely available, a better understanding of their performance during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection is needed. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic performance of home antigen tests compared with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culture by days from illness onset, as well as user acceptability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective cohort study was conducted from January to May 2021 in San Diego County, California, and metropolitan Denver, Colorado. The convenience sample included adults and children with RT-PCR-confirmed infection who used self-collected home antigen tests for 15 days and underwent at least 1 nasopharyngeal swab for RT-PCR, viral culture, and sequencing. EXPOSURES SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the daily sensitivity of home antigen tests to detect RT-PCR-confirmed cases. Secondary outcomes included the daily percentage of antigen test, RT-PCR, and viral culture results that were positive, and antigen test sensitivity compared with same-day RT-PCR and cultures. Antigen test use errors and acceptability were assessed for a subset of participants. RESULTS This study enrolled 225 persons with RT-PCR-confirmed infection (median [range] age, 29 [1-83] years; 117 female participants [52%]; 10 [4%] Asian, 6 [3%] Black or African American, 50 [22%] Hispanic or Latino, 3 [1%] Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 145[64%] White, and 11 [5%] multiracial individuals) who completed 3044 antigen tests and 642 nasopharyngeal swabs. Antigen test sensitivity was 50% (95% CI, 45%-55%) during the infectious period, 64% (95% CI, 56%-70%) compared with same-day RT-PCR, and 84% (95% CI, 75%-90%) compared with same-day cultures. Antigen test sensitivity peaked 4 days after illness onset at 77% (95% CI, 69%-83%). Antigen test sensitivity improved with a second antigen test 1 to 2 days later, particularly early in the infection. Six days after illness onset, antigen test result positivity was 61% (95% CI, 53%-68%). Almost all (216 [96%]) surveyed individuals reported that they would be more likely to get tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection if home antigen tests were available over the counter. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEThe results of this cohort study of home antigen tests suggest that sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 was moderate compared with RT-PCR and high compared with viral culture. The results also suggest that symptomatic individuals with an initial negative home antigen test result for SARS-CoV-2 infection should test again 1 to 2 days later because test sensitivity peaked several days after illness onset and improved with repeated testing.