No abstract

Two drawbacks in quality of portal radiographs in radiation therapy are their low contrast and low spatial resolution. These are due to the low differential absorption of body tissues at therapeutic energies and to a relatively large radiation source. We used an experimental, high-contrast sensitivity storage phosphor imaging system (Eastman Kodak Co.) to produce portal images. The system consists of a storage phosphor detector, a high-contrast sensitivity laser scanner (12 bit), an image processing module, and a laser printer (12 bit). Patients undergoing radiation therapy treatments had both a conventional portal image and a storage phosphor image taken. Both were displayed side-by-side and were evaluated independently by three radiotherapists according to quality of information to verify the treatment field. Each of the three radiotherapists rated the storage phosphor images to be better (p less than 0.001) than the conventional images. However, rated improvements of low-contrast storage phosphor images of the pelvis and abdomen (40) were significantly lower than those of high-contrast (head, neck, and chest) images (53).

The Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support (MDIS) system at Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC) has been operational in a phased approach since March 1992. Since then, nearly all image acquisition has been digital with progressively increasing primary softcopy diagnosis used. More than 375,000 computed radiography (CR) images as well as other modality images have been archived. Considerable experience in installation and implementation phasing has been gained. The Iocation and ergonomic aspects of equipment placement were refined with time. The original clinical scenario was insufficiently detailed and additions were made to facilitate smoother and more complete transition toward a filmless environment. The MDIS system effectiveness and performance have been good in terms of operational workload throughput, background operations, and reliability. The important areas regarding reliability are image acquisition, output, display, database operations, storage, and the local area network. Fail-safe strategies have been continually improved to maintain continuous clinical image availability during the times when the MDIS system or components malfunction. Many invaluable lessons have been learned for effective quality assurance in a hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system. These issues include training, operational quality control, practical aspects of CR image quality, and increased timeliness in the generation and distribution of radiographic reports. Clinical acceptability has been a continuous process as each phase has been implemented. Clinical physicians quickly used the workstations soon after the start of MDIS at MAMC. The major advantage for clinicians has been the amount of time saved when retrieving multimodality images for review. On the other hand, the radiologists have been slower in their acceptance of the workstation for routine use. Radiologists need the completed software and hardware implementation to achieve the throughput necessary for a high-volume practice setting in making primary softcopy diagnoses. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use. KEY WORDS: filmless hospital, Medical DiagnosticImaging Support (MDIS) System, picture archiving and communication system (PACS).