Hospitals have severely curtailed the performance of nonurgent surgical procedures in anticipation of the need to redeploy healthcare resources to meet the projected massive medical needs of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 . Surgical treatment of non-COVID-19 related disease during this period, however, still remains necessary. The decision to proceed with medically necessary, time-sensitive (MeNTS) procedures in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic requires incorporation of factors (resource limitations, COVID-19 transmission risk to providers and patients) heretofore not overtly considered by surgeons in the already complicated processes of clinical judgment and shared decision-making. We describe a scoring system that systematically integrates these factors to facilitate decision-making and triage for MeNTS procedures, and appropriately weighs individual patient risks with the ethical necessity of optimizing public health concerns. This approach is applicable across a broad range of hospital settings (academic and community, urban and rural) in the midst of the pandemic and may be able to inform case triage as operating room capacity resumes once the acute phase of the pandemic subsides.

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an uncommon condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients evaluated for ALF. The aim of our study is to determine the clinical features and outcome of such patients and to assess the validity of King's College Hospital (KCH) prognostic criteria. One hundred seventy-seven patients were evaluated for ALF during a period of 13 years. Mean age was 39 years, and 63% were women. The causes included viral hepatitis (31%), acetaminophen toxicity (19%), idiosyncratic drug reactions (12%), miscellaneous causes (11%), and an indeterminate group (28%). Twenty-five patients (14%) recovered with medical therapy (group I), 65 patients (37%) died without orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT; group II), and 87 patients (49%) underwent OLT (group III). Patients in group II were older and often had advanced encephalopathy, whereas those in group I had less hyperbilirubinemia and often had hyperacute failure. KCH criteria had high specificity and positive predictive value but low negative predictive value for a poor outcome. We conclude that early prognostication is needed in patients with ALF to assist decision making regarding OLT. The fulfillment of KCH criteria usually predicts a poor outcome, but a lack of fulfillment does not predict survival.

The bidirectional paradigm of tolerance involving reciprocal host vs. graft and graft vs. host reactions was examined after Lewis (LEW) → Brown Norway (BN) transplantation of different whole organs (liver, intestine, heart, and kidney) or of 2.5×10 8 LEW leukocytes obtained from bone marrow, spleen, lymph nodes, and thymus. The experiments were performed without immunosuppression or under 14 daily doses of postoperative tacrolimus, which were continued in weekly doses to 100 days in a "continuous treatment" subgroup, and to 27 days in a short treatment group. Without immunosuppression, all organs and cell suspensions failed to engraft or were acutely rejected. GVHD (usually fatal) was always caused when either the long or short treatment was used for recipients of intestinal grafts and cell suspensions of spleen and lymph nodes. In contrast, both immunosuppressive protocols allowed engraftment of bone marrow cells, liver, heart, and kidney without clinical GVHD, whereas thymus cell suspensions and small doses of whole blood neither engrafted nor caused GVHD. At 100 days, now drug-free for 73 days, the liver, bone marrow, and heart recipients were tolerant in that they accepted all challenge LEW heart and/or liver grafts for 100 more days despite in vitro evidence of donor-specific reactivity (split tolerance). At 200 days, histopathologic studies of the challenge livers were normal no matter what the priming graft. However, the still-beating challenge hearts had a spectrum from normal to severe chronic rejection that defined the tolerogenicity of the original primary grafts: liver best → bone marrow next → heart least. Both the GVHD propensity and tolerogenicity in these experiments were closely associated with recipient tissue chimerism 30 and 100 days after the experiments began. The tissue chimerism was invariably multilineage, but the GVHD outcome was associated with T cell over-representation. These observations provide guidelines that should be considered in devising leukocyte augmentation protocols for human whole organ recipients. The results are discussed in relation to the historical tolerance studies of Billingham, Brent, and Medawar; Good; Monaco; and Calne.

The clinicopathologic features of liver allograft dysfunction occurring in 51 symptomatic recipients after more than 5 years' survival (mean 7.1 years) with the same hepatic allograft were compared with those of a similar group of 14 asymptomatic patients (mean survival, 9.9 years) who underwent a nonclinically indicated protocol liver biopsy evaluation. Predictably, patients who had clinically indicated biopsies more frequently showed histopathologic alterations (76% versus 36%, p < 0.002). After detailed clinicopathologic correlation, the changes in the symptomatic patients were attributed primarily to definite or presumed viral hepatitis in 17 of 51 (33%) patients, 11 of whom had recurrent viral disease; seven of 51 (14%) had nonviral recurrent original disease, three (6%) had obstructive cholangiopathy, and 11 (22%) had acute and/or chronic rejection. In 13 of 51 (25%) of the symptomatic patients, the clinical and pathologic abnormalities were minimal. Long-term liver allograft survival in nine of 14 (64%) of the asymptomatic patients was associated with minimally abnormal histologic alterations. Two of the asymptomatic patients had obstructive cholangiopathy; two others has recurrence of the original disease and one has possible viral hepatitis. Viral hepatitis types B and C, alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, granulomatous hepatitis (not otherwise specified), and probably primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis were shown to recur after hepatic transplantation. The histopathologic changes associated with acute and chronic rejection frequently overlapped with other syndromes causing late dysfunction, such as chronic viral or autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, or primary sclerosing cholangitis; more than one insult could be identified in 15 cases, which made the differential diagnosis of causes of late liver allograft dysfunction much more difficult than early after hepatic transplantation. It is important to correlate the biopsy findings with the liver injury tests, the results of viral and autoimmune antibody serologic studies, and review of previous biopsies and to be aware of the original disease, recent changes in immunosuppression, and results of therapeutic intervention(s) to identify correctly the causes of liver allograft dysfunction in this patient population.

Seventy-two long-surviving liver transplant recipients were evaluated prospectively, including a baseline allograft biopsy for weaning off of immunosuppression. Thirteen were removed from candidacy because of chronic rejection (n=4), hepatitis (n=2), patient anxiety (n=5), or lack of cooperation by the local physician (n=2). The other 59, aged 12-68 years, had stepwise drug weaning with weekly or biweekly monitoring of liver function tests. Their original diagnoses were PBC (n=9), HCC (n=1), Wilson's disease (n=4), hepatitides (n=15), Laennec's cirrhosis (n=1), biliary atresia (n=16), cystic fibrosis (n=1), hemochromatosis (n=1), hepatic trauma (n=1), alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (n=9), and secondary biliary cirrhosis (n=1). Most of the patients had complications of long-term immunosuppression, of which the most significant were renal dysfunction (n=8), squamous cell carcinoma (n=2) or verruca vulgaris of skin (n=9), osteoporosis and/or arthritis (n=12), obesity (n=3), hypertension (n=11), and opportunistic infections (n=2). When azathioprine was a third drug, it was stopped first. Otherwise, weaning began with prednisone, using the results of corticotropin stimulation testing as a guide. If adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed, patients reduced to <5 mg/day prednisone were considered off of steroids. The baseline agents (azathioprine, cyclosporine, or FK506) were then gradually reduced in monthly decrements. Complete weaning was accomplished in 16 patients (27.1%) with 3-19 months drug-free follow-up, is progressing in 28 (47.4%), and failed in 15 (25.4%) without graft losses or demonstrable loss of graft function from the rejections. This and our previous experience with self-weaned and other patients off of immunosuppression indicate that a significant percentage of appropriately selected long-surviving liver recipients can unknowingly achieve drug-free graft acceptance. Such attempts should not be contemplated until 5-10 years posttransplantation and then only with careful case selection, close monitoring, and prompt reinstitution of immunosuppression when necessary.Lifetime immunosuppression has been a presumed necessity after clinical whole-organ transplantation. However, we have suggested elsewhere that liver allograft acceptance without a need for maintenance immunosuppression may have been accidentally achieved more often than realized (1). The recently proposed concept that donor leukocyte migration and long-term microchimerism is the basis of allograft acceptance (2) would account for the