MVRS ePTFE cordal implantation can reduce the invasiveness and morbidity of conventional MV surgery. The device's safety profile is promising and prospective trials comparing the outcomes of the MVRS to conventional MV repair surgery are warranted. (CE Mark Study for the Harpoon Medical Device [TRACER]; NCT02768870).

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of a novel, beating heart procedure that enables echocardiographic-guided beating heart implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) artificial cords on the posterior mitral leaflet of patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation. METHODS Two prospective multicentre studies enrolled 13 (first-in-human) and 52 subjects, respectively. Patients were treated with the HARPOON beating heart mitral valve repair system. The primary (30-day) end point was successful implantation of cord(s) with mitral regurgitation reduction to ≤moderate. An independent core laboratory analysed echocardiograms. RESULTS Of 65 patients enrolled, 62 (95%) achieved technical success, 2 patients required conversion to open surgery and 1 procedure was terminated. The primary end point was met in 59/65 (91%) patients. Among the 62 treated patients, the mean procedural time was 2.1 ± 0.5 h. Through discharge, there were no deaths, strokes or renal failure events. At 1 year, 2 of the 62 patients died (3%) and 8 (13%) others required reoperations. At 1 year, 98% of the patients with HARPOON cords were in New York Heart Association class I or II, and mitral regurgitation was none/trace in 52% (n = 27), mild in 23% (n = 12), moderate in 23% (n = 12) and severe in 2% (n = 1). Favourable cardiac remodelling outcomes at 1 year included decreased end-diastolic left ventricular volume (153 ± 41 to 119 ± 28 ml) and diameter (53 ± 5 to 47 ± 6 mm), and the mean transmitral gradient was 1.4 ± 0.7 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS This initial clinical experience with the HARPOON beating heart mitral valve repair system demonstrates encouraging early safety and performance. Clinical registration numbers NCT02432196 and NCT02768870.

Stress echocardiography is a safe diagnostic method, and major complications are very rare. Despite European recommendations, SE examinations to evaluate CAD are performed less frequently than electrocardiographic exercise tests, although they already comprise a significant proportion of all stress tests. It seems reasonable to promote SE further for the evaluation of both CAD and VHD.